Advertisement

Microstructure and mechanical properties of direct metal laser–sintered 15-5PH steel with different solution annealing heat treatments

  • Ala’aldin Alafaghani
  • Ala QattawiEmail author
  • Md Shah Jaman
  • Muhammad Ali Ablat
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

15-5PH parts that are fabricated using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) has shown mechanical properties comparable to conventionally manufactured parts. However, DMLS-fabricated 15-5PH parts have shown high anisotropy in their mechanical properties due to the layering nature of additive manufacturing process. In addition, the fatigue life and strength of DMLS 15-5PH varies significantly between horizontally and vertically fabricated parts and both orientations are inferior to conventionally manufactured parts. Reliability and large variations in performance remain as a barrier from employing 15-5PH parts fabricated using DMLS. Standard heat treatment of 15-5PH is insufficient to eliminate the anisotropy and homogenize the DMLS parts. Modified precipitation hardening heat treatments did not show further improvement in published literature. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate the influence of different solution annealing heat treatments on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 15-5PH steel produced using DMLS. Three different solution annealing heat treatments were investigated: the standard solution heat treatment, the second heat treatment extended the time from 1 to 3 h, the third heat treatment increased the temperature from 1038 to 1200 °C. For each heat treatment, three patches of specimens were fabricated each in one of the three principal orientations X, Y, and Z. In addition, three patches, one of each orientation, were tested in as-built condition. The specimens were tensile tested and their microstructure and fractured surfaces were imaged. It was found that extending the time of the heat treatment improved the homogenization while increasing the temperature of the heat treatment to 1200 °C had detrimental effects, especially on vertically fabricated specimens.

Keywords

Metal additive manufacturing Design for manufacturing Direct metal laser sintering Heat treatment Mechanical properties Microstructure 

Nomenclature

AM

additive manufacturing

DMLS

direct metal laser sintering

BCC

body-centered cubic

FCC

face-centered cubic

BCT

body-centered tetragonal

DIC

digital image correlation

ASTM

American Society for Testing and Materials

SEM

scanning electron microscope

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Lewis GK, Schlienger E (2000) Practical considerations and capabilities for laser assisted direct metal deposition. Mater Des 21:417–423Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gratton A (2012) Comparison of mechanical , metallurgical properties of 17-4PH stainless steel between direct metal laser sintering ( DMLS ) and traditional manufacturing methods. In: Proc. Natl. Conf. Undergrad. Res. 2012, pp 423–431Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jia Q, Gu D (Feb. 2014) Selective laser melting additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 superalloy parts: densification, microstructure and properties. J Alloys Compd 585:713–721Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Monkova K, Zetkova I, Kučerová L, Zetek M, Monka P, Daňa M (2019) Study of 3D printing direction and effects of heat treatment on mechanical properties of MS1 maraging steel. Arch Appl Mech 89(5):791–804Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yadollahi A, Shamsaei N, Thompson SM, Elwany A, Bian L (2017) Effects of building orientation and heat treatment on fatigue behavior of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel. Int J Fatigue 94:218–235Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amato KNN et al (2012) Microstructures and mechanical behavior of Inconel 718 fabricated by selective laser melting. Acta Mater 60(5):2229–2239Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trosch T, Strößner J, Völkl R, Glatzel U (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Inconel 718 compared to forging and casting. Mater Lett 164:428–431Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiumenti M et al (2017) Numerical modelling and experimental validation in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 18(October):171–185Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Irwin J, Reutzel EW, Michaleris P, Keist J, Nassar AR (2016) Predicting microstructure from thermal history during additive manufacturing for Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Sci Eng 138(11):111007Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Promoppatum et al., “Numerical modeling and experimental validation of thermal history and microstructure for additive manufacturing of an Inconel 718 product,” Prog. Addit. Manuf., vol. 3, no. 1–2, pp. 1–11, Jun. 2018Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suryawanshi J, Prashanth KG, Ramamurty U (2017) Mechanical behavior of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 696:113–121Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alafaghani A, Qattawi A, Castañón MAG (2018) Effect of manufacturing parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of metal laser sintering parts of precipitate hardenable metals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99(9–12):2491–2507Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beretta S, Romano S (2017) A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes. Int J Fatigue 94:178–191Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mower TM, Long MJ (2016) Mechanical behavior of additive manufactured , powder-bed laser-fused materials. Mater Sci Eng A 651:198–213Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sames WJ, List FA, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 6608(March):1–46Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Makoana N, Yadroitsava I, Möller H, Yadroitsev I (2018) Characterization of 17-4PH single tracks produced at different parametric conditions towards increased productivity of LPBF systems—the effect of laser power and spot size upscaling. Metals (Basel) 8(7):475Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Popovici TD, Dijmrescu MR, Angelastro A, Campanelli SL, Linda M (2017) Influence of laser power on microstructure of laser metal deposited 17–4 ph stainless steel influence of laser power on microstructure of laser metal deposited 17–4 ph stainless steel, pp 0–7Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H, Starr T, Stucker B (2014) Analysis of defect generation in Ti-6Al-4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 1:87–98Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vrancken B, Thijs L, Kruth J, Van Humbeeck J, Van Humbeeck J (2012) Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting : microstructure and mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd 541(0):177–185Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jafarlou DM, Walde C, Champagne VK, Krishnamurty S, Grosse IR (2018) Influence of cold sprayed Cr 3 C 2 -Ni coating on fracture characteristics of additively manufactured 15Cr-5Ni stainless steel. Mater Des 155:134–147, OctGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Thöne, S. Leuders, A. Riemer, T. Tröster, and H. A. Richard, “Influence of heat-treatment on selective laser melting products – e.g. Ti6Al4V,” SFF, Austin Texas, pp. 492–498, 2012Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abad A, Hahn M, Es-Said OS (2010) Corrosion of 15-5PH H1025 stainless steel due to environmental conditions. Eng Fail Anal 17(1):208–212Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Couturier L, De Geuser F, Descoins M, Deschamps A (2016) Evolution of the microstructure of a 15-5PH martensitic stainless steel during precipitation hardening heat treatment. Mater Des 107:416–425Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abdelshehid M, Mahmodieh K, Mori K, Chen L, Stoyanov P, Davlantes D, Foyos J, Ogren J, Clark R Jr, Es-Said OS (2007) On the correlation between fracture toughness and precipitation hardening heat treatments in 15-5PH stainless steel. Eng Fail Anal 14(4):626–631Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen HC, Pinkerton AJ, Li L (2011) Fibre laser welding of dissimilar alloys of Ti-6Al-4V and Inconel 718 for aerospace applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(9–12):977–987Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kamal M, Rizza G (2019) Design for metal additive manufacturing for aerospace applications. Addit Manuf Aerosp Ind:67–86Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dossett JL, Boyer HE (2006) Practical heat treating, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smallman RE and Ngan AHW, (2007) Physical metallurgy and advanced materials engineeringGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sakhawat S, Baig MN, Falahati A, Degischer HP, Dománková M, Mahmood A Investigations of precipitation in two different types of precipitation hardening stainless steels, pp 13–18Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Habibi Bajguirani HR (2002) The effect of ageing upon the microstructure and mechanical properties of type 15-5 PH stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 338(1–2):142–159Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Pal et al., “The effect of post-processing and machining process parameters on properties of Stainless Steel PH1 product produced by direct metal laser,” Procedia Eng., vol. 149, no. June, pp. 359–365, Jan. 2016Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lum E, Palazotto AN, Dempsey A, and Abrahams R, “Analysis of the effects of additive manufacturing on the material properties of 15-5PH stainless steel,” in 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2017, no. JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buchanan C, Matilainen V-P, Salminen A, Gardner L (2017) Structural performance of additive manufactured metallic material and cross-sections. J Constr Steel Res 136:35–48Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rafi HK, Starr TL, Stucker BE (2013) A comparison of the tensile, fatigue, and fracture behavior of Ti-6Al-4V and 15-5 PH stainless steel parts made by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5–8):1299–1309Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Spierings AB, Starr TL, Wegener K (2013) Fatigue performance of additive manufactured metallic parts. Rapid Prototyp J 19:88–94Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yadollahi A, Simsiriwong J, Thompson SM (2016) Data demonstrating the effects of build orientation and heat treatment on fatigue behavior of selective laser melted 17 – 4 PH stainless steel. Data Br 7:89–92Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sarkar S, Kumar CS, Nath AK (2019) Effects of different surface modifications on the fatigue life of selective laser melted 15–5 PH stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 762:138109Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sarkar S, Kumar CS, Nath AK (2019) Effects of heat treatment and build orientations on the fatigue life of selective laser melted 15-5 PH stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 755:235–245Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sarkar S, Kumar CS, Nath AK (2019) Investigation on the mode of failures and fatigue life of laser-based powder bed fusion produced stainless steel parts under variable amplitude loading conditions. Addit Manuf 25:71–83Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Masoomi M, Shamsaei N, Winholtz RA, Milner JL, Gnäupel-Herold T, Elwany A, Mahmoudi M, Thompson SM (2017) Data in brief residual stress measurements via neutron diffraction of additive manufactured stainless steel 17-4 PH. Data Br 13:408–414Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Clausen B, Brown DW, Carpenter JS, Clarke KD, Clarke AJ, Vogel SC, Bernardin JD, Spernjak D, Thompson JM (2017) Deformation behavior of additively manufactured GP1 stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 696(February):331–340Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carlton HD, Haboub A, Gallegos GF, Parkinson DY, Macdowell AA (2016) Materials Science & Engineering a damage evolution and failure mechanisms in additively manufactured stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 651:406–414Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Facchini L, Vicente N, Lonardelli I, Magalini E, Robotti P, Alberto M (2010) Metastable austenite in 17-4 precipitation-hardening stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. Adv Eng Mater 12(3):184–188Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cheruvathur S, Lass EA, Campbell CE (2016) Additive manufacturing of 17-4 PH stainless steel: post-processing heat treatment to achieve uniform reproducible microstructure. Jom 68(3):930–942Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Fini S, Olmi G, Bogojevic N, Ciric-Kostic S (2018) Effects of build orientation and thickness of allowance on the fatigue behaviour of 15–5 PH stainless steel manufactured by DMLS. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 41(4):900–916Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    K. M. Coffy, “Microstructure and chemistry evaluation of direct metal laser sintered 15-5 PH stainless steel,” Electron Theses Diss, vol Paper 4756, p. 160, 2014Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rafi HK, Pal D, Patil N, Starr TL, Stucker BE (2014) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of 17-4 precipitation hardenable steel processed by selective laser melting. J Mater Eng Perform 23(12):4421–4428Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sarkar S, Kumar CS, Nath AK (2017) Effect of different heat treatments on mechanical properties of laser sintered additive manufactured parts. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(11):111010Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Alafaghani A, Qattawi A, Ablat MA (2017) Design consideration for additive manufacturing: fused deposition modelling. Open J Appl Sci 07(06):291–318Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vayre B, Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2012) Metallic additive manufacturing: state-of-the-art review and prospects. Mech Ind 13(2):89–96Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    ASTM (2012) F2921 - standard terminology for additive manufacturing — coordinate systems and test. Am Soc Test Mater, vol. i:12Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    ASTM Int. and ASTM (2009) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, Astm, no. C, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Moyer JM and Ansell GS, “The volume expansion accompanying the martensite transformation in iron-carbon alloys”Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dempsey A, Liu D, Palazotto AN, Abrahams R (2016) Dynamic properties of additively manufactured 15-5 stainless steel and three-dimensional microstructure characterization. In: 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Huang E-W, Lee SY, Jain J, Tong Y, An K, Tsou NT, Lam TN, Yu D, Chae H, Chen SW, Chen SM, Chou HS (2019) Hardening steels by the generation of transient phase using additive manufacturing. Intermetallics 109:60–67Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sun Y, Hebert RJ, Aindow M (2018) Effect of heat treatments on microstructural evolution of additively manufactured and wrought 17-4PH stainless steel. Mater Des 156:429–440Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Chae H, Huang EW, Jain J, Wang H, Woo W, Chen SW, Harjo S, Kawasaki T, Lee SY (2019) Plastic anisotropy and deformation-induced phase transformation of additive manufactured stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 762:138065Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hu Z, Zhu H, Zhang H, Zeng X (2017) Experimental investigation on selective laser melting of 17-4PH stainless steel. Opt Laser Technol 87:17–25Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Fini S, Olmi G, Bogojevic N, and Ciric-Kostic S (2018) How build orientation and thickness of allowance may affect the fatigue response Of DMLS produced 15-5 PH stainless steelGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Alnajjar M, Christien F, Wolski K, Bosch C (2019) Evidence of austenite by-passing in a stainless steel obtained from laser melting additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 25:187–195Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    yuan Peng X, liang X, ZHOU X, Hua Z, Wei Z w, LIU HY (2015) Effect of aging on hardening behavior of 15-5 PH stainless steel. J Iron Steel Res Int 22(7):607–614Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Slunder AM, C. J., Hoenie AF, & Hall (1967) “Thermal and mechanical treatment for precipitation-hardening stainless steels,” NASA SP-5089 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of California MercedMercedUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical, Industrial & Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of ToledoToledoUSA

Personalised recommendations