Advertisement

Experimental investigation of cryogenic end milling on maraging steel using cryogenically treated tungsten carbide-cobalt inserts

  • Vinay VargheseEmail author
  • M. R. Ramesh
  • D. Chakradhar
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

The cryogenic machining and cryogenic treatment have already emerged as the sustainable manufacturing process of the future generation. The cryogenic treatment improves the cutting tool life, but the high cutting temperature developed during high-speed machining reduces the effect of cryogenic treatment of cutting tool. This study investigates the possible improvements in cutting tool life by combining cryogenic cooling and cryogenic treatment. The authors believe that these two techniques can replace conventional machining approaches using dry and wet machining conditions using coated carbide tools. The tungsten carbide-cobalt inserts are cryogenically treated (CT) at a soaking temperature of − 195.8 °C for a period of 24 h and are used to evaluate milling performance under dry, wet, and cryogenic cutting environments. The machining experiments are conducted on maraging steel MDN 250 using one factor at a time approach by varying spindle speed and keeping feed rate and depth of cut as constant. The cutting force, surface roughness, tool wear, and subsurface microhardness are some of the machining responses evaluated and compared with an untreated cutting tool (UT). The tool life improved up to 24% during cryogenic machining using CT tools at a spindle speed of 270 rpm.

Keywords

Cryogenic machining Cryogenic treatment Sustainable manufacturing Maraging steel Tool life Microhardness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Raunak Chandak, Makarni Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (MIPL), India, for the help and support given in conducting cryogenic treatment of inserts.

References

  1. 1.
    Fortunato A, Lulaj A, Melkote S, Liverani E, Ascari A, Umbrello D (2018) Milling of maraging steel components produced by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:1895–1902.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0922-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nikalje AM, Kumar A, Srinadh KVS (2013) Influence of parameters and optimization of EDM performance measures on MDN 300 steel using Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:41–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5008-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santhanakumar M, Adalarasan R, Siddharth S, Velayudham A (2017) An investigation on surface finish and flank wear in hard machining of solution treated and aged 18% Ni maraging steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39:2071–2084.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0572-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozbek NA, Çiçek A, Gülesin M, Özbek O (2014) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic treatment applied at different holding times to cemented carbide inserts on tool wear. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 86:34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bensely A, Prabhakaran A, Mohan Lal D, Nagarajan G (2005) Enhancing the wear resistance of case carburized steel (En 353) by cryogenic treatment. Cryogenics (Guildf) 45:747–754.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2005.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhirafar S, Rezaeian A, Pugh M (2007) Effect of cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of 4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 186:298–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yong J, Ding C (2011) Effect of cryogenic treatment on WC-Co cemented carbides. Mater Sci Eng A 528:1735–1739.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gill SS, Singh J, Singh H, Singh R (2012) Metallurgical and mechanical characteristics of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide (WC-Co). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:119–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3369-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xie CH, Huang JW, Tang YF, Gu LN (2015) Effects of deep cryogenic treatment on microstructure and properties of WC-11Co cemented carbides with various carbon contents. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed) 25:3023–3028.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63929-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yong AYL, Seah KHW, Rahman M (2007) Performance of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide tools in milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:638–643.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0379-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reddy TVS, Sornakumar T, Reddy MV, Venkatram R, Senthilkumar A (2009) Turning studies of deep cryogenic treated P-40 tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts—technical communication. Mach Sci Technol 13:269–281.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10910340902979754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    SreeramaReddy TV, Sornakumar T, VenkataramaReddy M, Venkatram R (2009) Machinability of C45 steel with deep cryogenic treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27:181–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ozbek NA, Cicek A, Gülesin M, Özbek O (2016) Effect of cutting conditions on wear performance of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide inserts in dry turning of stainless steel. Tribol Int 94:223–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Varghese V, Ramesh MR, Chakradhar D (2019) Influence of deep cryogenic treatment on performance of cemented carbide (WC-Co) inserts during dry end milling of maraging steel. J Manuf Process 37:242–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dhar NR, Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB (2001) The influence of cryogenic cooling on tool wear, dimensional accuracy and surface finish in turning AISI 1040 and E4340C steels. Wear 249:932–942.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00825-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D (2017) Comparative evaluations of machining performance during turning of 17-4 PH stainless steel under cryogenic and wet machining conditions. Mach Sci Technol 22:147–162.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2017.1337129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D (2017) Machinability studies on 17-4 PH stainless steel under cryogenic cooling environment. Mater Manuf Process 32:1775–1788.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1339317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sivaiah P, Chakradhar D (2017) Influence of cryogenic coolant on turning performance characteristics: a comparison with wet machining. Mater Manuf Process 32:1475–1485.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2016.1269920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Govindaraju N, Shakeel Ahmed L, Pradeep Kumar M (2014) Experimental investigations on cryogenic cooling in the drilling of AISI 1045 steel. Mater Manuf Process 29:1417–1421.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2014.930952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Manivannan R, Kumar MP (2017) Improving the machining performance characteristics of the μEDM drilling process by the online cryogenic cooling approach. Mater Manuf Process 33:390–396.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1303145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ahmed LS, Pradeep Kumar M (2017) Investigation of cryogenic cooling effect in reaming Ti-6AL-4V alloy. Mater Manuf Process 32:970–978.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2016.1221088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar SV, Kumar MP (2014) Optimization of cryogenic cooled EDM process parameters using grey relational analysis. J Mech Sci Technol 28:3777–3784.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-014-0840-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Varghese V, Ramesh MR, Chakradhar D (2018) Experimental investigation and optimization of machining parameters for sustainable machining. Mater Manuf Process 33:1782–1792.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2018.1476760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rahman M, Kumar AS, Ling MS (2003) Effect of chilled air on machining performance in end milling. 787–795Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ravi S, Pradeep Kumar M (2011) Experimental investigations on cryogenic cooling by liquid nitrogen in the end milling of hardened steel. Cryogenics (Guildf) 51:509–515.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2011.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ravi S, Kumar MP (2012) Experimental investigation of cryogenic cooling in milling of AISI D3 tool steel. Mater Manuf Process 27:1017–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2011.654157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2016) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic machining on surface integrity in CNC end milling of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 21:172–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Polytechnique C, Lausanne RDE (2000) Propriétés mécaniques à haute température de cermets Ti ( C , N ) -WC-Mo-Co à gradient de composition pour outils de coupe. 2161:Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gill SS, Singh J, Singh H, Singh R (2011) Investigation on wear behaviour of cryogenically treated TiAlN coated tungsten carbide inserts in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thakur D, Ramamoorthy B, Vijayaraghavan L (2008) Influence of different post treatments on tungsten carbide-cobalt inserts. Mater Lett 62:4403–4406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2008.07.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Padmakumar M, Guruprasath J, Achuthan P, Dinakaran D (2018) Investigation of phase structure of cobalt and its effect in WC – Co cemented carbides before and after deep cryogenic treatment. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 74:87–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gill SS, Singh H, Singh R, Singh J (2011) Flank wear and machining performance of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide inserts. Mater Manuf Process 26:1430–1441.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2011.557128 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dhar NR, Islam S, Kamruzzaman M, Paul S (2006) Wear behavior of uncoated carbide inserts under dry, wet and cryogenic cooling conditions in turning C-60 steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 28:146–152.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-58782006000200003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Varghese V, Akhil K, Ramesh MR, Chakradhar D (2019) Investigation on the performance of AlCrN and AlTiN coated cemented carbide inserts during end milling of maraging steel under dry , wet and cryogenic environments. J Manuf Process 43:136–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sivalingam V, Sun J, Yang B, Liu K, Raju R (2018) Machining performance and tool wear analysis on cryogenic treated insert during end milling of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Manuf Process 36:188–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Behera BC, Ghosh S, Rao PV (2016) Application of nanofluids during minimum quantity lubrication: a case study in turning process. Tribol Int 101:234–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bermingham MJ, Kirsch J, Sun S, Palanisamy S, Dargusch MS (2011) New observations on tool life, cutting forces and chip morphology in cryogenic machining Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:500–511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thakur A, Gangopadhyay S (2016) Dry machining of nickel-based super alloy as a sustainable alternative using TiN / TiAlN coated tool. J Clean Prod 129:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Akhbarizadeh A, Shafyei A, Golozar MA (2009) Effects of cryogenic treatment on wear behavior of D6 tool steel. Mater Des 30:3259–3264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Molinari A, Pellizzari M, Gialanella S, Straffelini G, Stiasny KH (2001) Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of tool steels. J Mater Process Technol 118:350–355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00973-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Munoz-Escalona P, Shokrani A, Newman ST (2014) Influence of cutting environments on surface integrity and power consumption of austenitic stainless steel. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 36:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2014.12.013 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Umbrello D (2013) Investigation of surface integrity in dry machining of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:2183–2190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5198-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yang S, Umbrello D, Dillon OW et al (2015) Cryogenic cooling effect on surface and subsurface microstructural modifications in burnishing of Co-Cr-Mo biomaterial. J Mater Process Technol 217:211–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology KarnatakaSurathkalIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyPalakkadIndia

Personalised recommendations