Investigation of the effects of pre-cross-linked thermoset molding compounds on weld line strength in injection molding

  • Yang ZhaoEmail author
  • Tobias Mattner
  • Dietmar Drummer


In this study, epoxy molding compounds (EMC) filled with glass beads were fabricated with a twin-screw-extruder (TSE) and tempered before further processing to generate different degrees of cross-linking (0–15%) in the compounds. After that, the compounds were injection-molded into tensile samples with and without weld lines to investigate the influence of pre-cross-linking of compounds on the weld line strength. Both the referent fracture strength and the weld line strength were improved with the increase of pre-cross-linking in compounds. Especially, cavities in the weld line area were reduced presumably due to the improved venting with the increased viscosity. For the resized samples without notches, their weld line strength are higher than those with notches. The in-mold pressure of more pre-cross-linked compounds can be hold longer than less pre-cross-linked compounds. This could lead to a better compensation of the material shrinkage. This might be the reason for the improved weld line strength for more pre-cross-linked compounds.


Epoxy molding compound (EMC) Thermosets injection molding Weld line strength In-mold pressure Flow-hardening behavior Curing degree Melt flow behavior 


Author contributions

Yang Zhao conceived and performed the experiments. Tobias Mattner and Dietmar Drummer helped with the data analysis and revision of the paper.

Funding information

Authors thank the support for the program INST 90-749-1 funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeischaft (DFG) and the gratuitous borrowing of the measuring mixer MB30 from Brabender GmbH, Duisburg, Germany.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Chiu HT, Chung JS (2003) Study of the properties and reliability of EMC packaging material. J Appl Polym Sci 90:3928–3933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zheng R (2011) Injection molding: integration of theory and modeling methods. Springer, Berlin ; Heidelberg pp. XII, 188 S. : graph. Darst. ; 124 cmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Han R, Shi L, Gupta M (2000) Three-dimensional simulation of microchip encapsulation process. Polym Eng Sci 40:776–785. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu C-Y, Ku C-C, Pai H-Y (2011) Injection molding optimization with weld line design constraint using distributed multi-population genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:131–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C., M.S.; I., M.A.; C., R.D (1981) Weld line structures and properties in injection molded polypropylene. Polym Eng Sci 21:1149–1155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kitayama S, Tamada K, Takano M, Aiba S (2018) Numerical and experimental investigation on process parameters optimization in plastic injection molding for weldlines reduction and clamping force minimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:2087–2098. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ozcelik B (2011) Optimization of injection parameters for mechanical properties of specimens with weld line of polypropylene using Taguchi method. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 38:1067–1072. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xie L, Ziegmann G (2011) Mechanical properties of the weld line defect in micro injection molding for various nano filled polypropylene composites. J Alloys Compd 509:226–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xie L, Ziegmann G (2008) A visual mold with variotherm system for weld line study in micro injection molding. Microsyst Technol 14:809–814. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen-Chung, T. Strömungsanalyse der Bindenahtformation beim Spritzgießen von thermoplastischen Kunststoffen. 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xie L, Ziegmann G (2010) Effect of gate dimension on micro injection molded weld line strength with polypropylene (PP) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:71–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tosello G, Gava A, Hansen HN, Lucchetta G (2010) Study of process parameters effect on the filling phase of micro-injection moulding using weld lines as flow markers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47:81–97. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kagitci YC, Tarakcioglu N (2016) The effect of weld line on tensile strength in a polymer composite part. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:1125–1135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malguarnera S, Manisali A (1981) The effects of processing parameters on the tensile properties of weld lines in injection molded thermoplastics. Polym Eng Sci 21:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malguarnera SC (1982) Weld lines in polymer processing. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 18:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Onken J, Hopmann C (2016) Prediction of weld line strength in injection-moulded parts made of unreinforced amorphous thermoplastics. Int Polym Sci Technol 43:T1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tomari K, Tonogai S, Harada T, Hamada H, Lee K, Morii T, Maekawa Z (1990) The V-notch at weld lines in polystyrene injection moldings. Polym Eng Sci 30:931–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Höer, M. Einfluss der Material-und Verarbeitungseigenschaften von Phenolharzformmassen auf die Qualität spritzgegossener Bauteile. 2014.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tran NT, Englich S, Gehde M (2018) Visualization of wall slip during thermoset phenolic resin injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:4023–4029. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dietmar D, Christian G, Zhao Y (2016) Eliminating weld-seam weakness: thermoset injection molding with forced ventilation by mold evacuation. Kunststoffe Int 2016:52–55Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kamal MR, Ryan M (1980) The behavior of thermosetting compounds in injection molding cavities. Polym Eng Sci 20:859–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wisanrakkit G, Gillham JK (1990) The glass transition temperature (Tg) as an index of chemical conversion for a high-Tg amine/epoxy system: chemical and diffusion-controlled reaction kinetics. J Appl Polym Sci 41:2885–2929. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thirtha V, Lehman R, Nosker T (2005) Glass transition phenomena in melt-processed polystyrene/polypropylene blends. Polym Eng Sci 45:1187–1193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ferrillo RG, Achorn PJ (1997) Comparison of thermal techniques for glass transition assignment. II Commercial polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 64:191–195.<191::Aid-app17>3.0.Co;2-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kurr F (2015) Handbook of plastics failure analysis. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Company KG, MunichCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cain ML (2016) Epoxy resins: synthesis, applications and recent developments. Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harsch M, Karger-Kocsis J, Herzog F (2007) Influence of cure regime on the strain development in an epoxy resin as monitored by a fiber Bragg grating sensor. Macromol Mater Eng 292:474–483. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Polymer TechnologyUniversity Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations