Laser shock hydraulic forming for micro-bowl with miniature concave

  • Kai Sun
  • Huixia LiuEmail author
  • Youjuan Ma
  • Zongbao Shen
  • Fei Liu
  • Xiao Wang


A novel laser shock forming process called micro-laser shock hydraulic forming (MLSHF) was proposed to fabricate a micro-bowl with miniature concave at the apex of the bottom. Liquid water, used as a soft punch, can generate pressure waves under the action of laser shock to deform a 30-μm-thick copper foil. The influence of laser energy on morphology, forming accuracy, thickness distribution, and surface quality under MLSHF process was discussed through experimental means. Experimental results showed that the miniature concave was fabricated at 1050 mJ, and the whole micro-bowl was formed at 1550 mJ. With the increase of laser energy, the fittability improved and rebound became increasingly severe. Serious thinning occurred at the fillet of the miniature concave. Moreover, the die with great surface quality reduced the surface roughness of the workpiece surface that contacted with the die. A numerical finite element analysis (FEA) model was established by Hypermesh/LS-DANA. The FEA model was firstly verified through an experiment, and then it was used to investigate the deformation behavior including dynamic forming process and strain distribution.


Micro-laser shock hydraulic forming Miniature concave Micro-forming Liquid medium Finite element analysis (FEA) 


Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51675243).


  1. 1.
    Schubert A, Jahn SF, Müller B (2014) Modular tool concept and process design for micro impact extrusion. Precis Eng 38:57–63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engel U, Eckstein R (2002) Microforming - from basic research to its realization. In: Journal of Materials Processing TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fu MW, Wang JL, Korsunsky AM (2016) A review of geometrical and microstructural size effects in micro-scale deformation processing of metallic alloy components. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 109:94–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu HX, Hu Y, Wang X, Shen ZB, Li P, Gu CX, Liu H, du DZ, Guo C (2013) Grain refinement progress of pure titanium during laser shock forming (LSF) and mechanical property characterizations with nanoindentation. Mater Sci Eng A 564:13–21. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao H, Ye C, Cheng GJ (2009) Deformation behaviors and critical parameters in microscale laser dynamic forming. J Manuf Sci Eng 131:051011. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hackel L, Harris F (2002) Contour forming of metals by laser peeningGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderholm NC (1970) Laser-generated stress waves. Appl Phys Lett 16:113–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Keefe JD, Skeen CH (1972) Laser-induced stress-wave and impulse augmentation. Appl Phys Lett 21:464–466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu H, Shen Z, Wang X, Wang H (2009) Numerical simulation and experimentation of a novel laser indirect shock forming. J Appl Phys 106:063107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang X, Ma Y, Shen Z, Gu Y, Zhang D, Qiu T, Liu H (2015) Size effects on formability in microscale laser dynamic forming of copper foil. J Mater Process Technol 220:173–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang W, Liu H, Shen Z, Zhang G, Ma Y, Wang X (2017) Experimental investigation on the formation behavior for three-layer metal sheets under laser high speed flexible micro-forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:3149–3157. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson S (2002) Surfaces and their measurement. Tribol Int 36:213–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emblom WJ, Jones RJ, Aithal M, Ibne Islam MFS, Glass GA, Wagner SW (2014) The development of a microscale strain measurement system applied to sheet bulge hydroforming. J Manuf Process 16:320–328. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kohzu M, Yoshida F, Somekawa H, Yoshikawa M, Tanabe S, Higashi K (2005) Fracture mechanism and forming limit in deep-drawing of magnesium alloy AZ31. Mater Trans 42:1273–1276. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang Q, Zhang T, Dai M, Fan S, Ben N, Wu S (2016) Numerical simulation and experimental research on water jet forming of copper foil. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:2265–2276. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sato H, Manabe KI, Kondo D, et al. (2014) Formability of micro sheet hydroforming of ultra-fine grained stainless steel. In: Procedia EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hung JC, Lin CC (2012) Fabrication of micro-flow channels for metallic bipolar plates by a high-pressure hydroforming apparatus. J Power Sources 206:179–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu Z, Peng L, Yi P, Lai X (2012) Modeling of microchannel hydroforming process with thin metallic sheets. J Eng Mater Technol 134:021017. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zheng C, Sun S, Ji Z, Wang W (2010) Effect of laser energy on the deformation behavior in microscale laser bulge forming. Appl Surf Sci 257:1589–1595. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zheng C, Zhang X, Liu Z, Ji Z, Yu X, Song L (2018) Investigation on initial grain size and laser power density effects in laser shock bulging of copper foil. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:1483–1496. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang X, Zhang Y, Yin Y, Zhang Y, Li S, Duan S, Huang Z, Chen B, Pei S, Wang H (2017) Simulation of the forming process of conical cup shaped by laser-induced shock waves. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:1619–1630. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zheng C, Sun S, Ji Z, Wang W, Liu J (2010) Numerical simulation and experimentation of micro scale laser bulge forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:1048–1056. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zheng C, Ji Z, Song L, Fu J, Zhu Y, Zhang J (2015) Variation of fracture mode in micro-scale laser shock punching. Opt Laser Technol 72:25–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proc 7th Int Symp BallistGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang X, Du D, Zhang H et al (2013) Investigation of microscale laser dynamic flexible forming process - simulation and experiments. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 67:8–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dirikolu MH, Akdemir E (2004) Computer aided modelling of flexible forming process. J Mater Process Technol 148:376–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Varas D, Zaera R, López-Puente J (2009) Numerical modelling of the hydrodynamic ram phenomenon. Int J Impact Eng 36:363–374. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fabbro R, Fournier J, Ballard P, Devaux D, Virmont J (1990) Physical study of laser-produced plasma in confined geometry. J Appl Phys 68:775–784. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peyre P, Fabbro R (1995) Laser shock processing: a review of the physics and applications. Opt Quant Electron 27:1213–1229.
  30. 30.
    Zhang W, Yao YL (2002) Micro scale laser shock processing of metallic components. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:369. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang X, Shen Z, Gu C, Zhang D, Gu Y, Liu H (2014) Laser indirect shock micro-embossing of commercially pure copper and titanium sheet. Opt Lasers Eng 56:74–82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu H, Sun X, Shen Z, Li L, Sha C, Ma Y, Gau JT, Wang X (2017) Experimental and numerical simulation investigation on laser flexible shock micro-bulging. Metals (Basel). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cheng GJ, Pirzada D, Ming Z (2007) Microstructure and mechanical property characterizations of metal foil after microscale laser dynamic forming. J Appl Phys 101:063108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shen Z, Gu C, Liu H, Wang X (2013) An experimental study of overlapping laser shock micro-adjustment using a pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Opt Laser Technol 54:110–119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu F, Liu H, Jiang C, Ma Y, Wang X (2018) Experimental and numerical investigations of a novel laser impact liquid flexible microforming process. Metals (Basel). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang X, She J, Li S, Duan S, Zhou Y, Yu X, Zheng R, Zhang B (2015) Simulation on deforming progress and stress evolution during laser shock forming with finite element method. J Mater Process Technol 220:27–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai Sun
    • 1
  • Huixia Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Youjuan Ma
    • 1
  • Zongbao Shen
    • 1
  • Fei Liu
    • 1
  • Xiao Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina

Personalised recommendations