Multi-scale modeling of selective electron beam melting of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy

  • Trong-Nhan Le
  • Yu-Lung LoEmail author
  • Hong-Chuong Tran


Selective electron beam melting (SEBM) is one of the most promising powder-based metal additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. However, controlling the SEBM process parameters in such a way as to maximize the quality of the fabricated components represents a significant challenge. Accordingly, taking Ti6Al4V titanium alloy for illustration purposes, the present study constructs a novel multi-scale modeling framework to examine the effects of three SEBM process parameters (namely the beam current, the beam diameter, and the scanning speed) on the dimensions and temperature distribution of the melt pool. In microscale, an effective model considering the interactions between the electron beam and the Ti6Al4V atoms was constructed based on the Monte Carlo ray-tracing simulations, and the electron beam total absorption of Ti6Al4V material as a function of incidence angle was obtained. In mesoscopic level, in order to take the absorption property of the porous structure of the powder layer into account, absorptivity profile along the depth of the powder bed was calculated by utilizing the absorptivity of Ti6Al4V for various incidence angles and the 3-D powder bed model. It is found that the total laser absorptivity of the Ti6Al4V powder bed is around 12% higher than that of the bulk material of Ti6Al4V due to the multiple reflection of electron beam inside the powder layer. Finally, three-dimensional finite element heat transfer simulations are performed using the proposed volumetric heat source to predict the melt pool geometry and thermal distribution during the SEBM process. It is shown that the simulation results are in good agreements with the experimental results reported in the literature.


Selective electron beam melting Ray tracing Volumetric heat source Melt pool 


Funding information

This study received financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST) under Grant No.107-2218-E-006-051. The research was also supported in part by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, under funding provided to the Headquarters of University Advancement to the Intelligent Manufacturing Research Center (iMRC), National Cheng Kung University (NCKU).


  1. 1.
    Körner C (2016) Additive manufacturing of metallic components by selective electron beam melting—a review. Int Mater Rev 61:361–377. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gong X, Anderson T, Chou K (2012) Review on powder-based electron beam additive manufacturing technology, in ASME/ISCIE 2012 international symposium on flexible automation. Am Soc Mech Eng 507–515. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2010) Design for additive manufacturing. In: Additive manufacturing technologies. Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 299–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markl M, Körner C (2016) Multiscale modeling of powder bed–based additive manufacturing. Annu Rev Mater Res 46:93–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khairallah SA, Anderson A (2014) Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder. J Mater Process Technol 214:2627–2636. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosenthal D (1946) The theory of moving sources of heat and its application to metal treatments. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 68:849–866. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pavelic V, Tanbakuchi R, Uyehara OA, Myers PS (1969) Experimental and computed temperature histories in gas tungsten-arc welding of thin plates. Weld J 48:295–305Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M (1984) A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Trans B 15:299–305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zäh MF, Lutzmann S (2010) Modelling and simulation of electron beam melting. Prod Eng 4:15–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yan W, Smith J, Ge W, Lin F, Liu WK (2015) Multiscale modeling of electron beam and substrate interaction: a new heat source model. Comput Mech 56:265–276. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mahale TR (2009) Electron beam melting of advanced materials and structures. North Carolina State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klassen A, Bauereiß A, Körner C (2014) Modelling of electron beam absorption in complex geometries. J Phys D 47:065307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yan W, Ge W, Smith J, Lin S, Kafka OL, Lin F, Liu WK (2016) Multi-scale modeling of electron beam melting of functionally graded materials. Acta Mater 115:403–412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gauvin R, L’Espérance G (1992) A Monte Carlo code to simulate the effect of fast secondary electrons on κAB factors and spatial resolution in the TEM. J Microsc 168:153–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shimizu R, Ze-Jun D (1992) Monte Carlo modelling of electron-solid interactions. Rep Prog Phys 55:487–531. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Drouin D, Hovington P, Gauvin R (2006) CASINO: a new Monte Carlo code in C language for electron beam interactions-part II: tabulated values of the Mott cross section. Scanning 19:20–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Körner C, Attar E, Heinl P (2011) Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes. J Mater Process Technol 211:978–987. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shi Y, Zhang Y (2006) Simulation of random packing of spherical particles with different size distributions. In: ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 539–544.
  19. 19.
    Tran HC, Lo YL, Huang MH (2017) Analysis of scattering and absorption characteristics of metal powder layer for selective laser sintering. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 22:1807–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Price S, Cheng B, Lydon J, Cooper K, Chou K (2014) On process temperature in powder-bed electron beam additive manufacturing: process parameter effects. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:061019. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tran HC, Lo YL (2018) Heat transfer simulations of selective laser melting process based on volumetric heat source with powder size consideration. J Mater Process Technol 255:411–425. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jamshidinia M, Kong F, Kovacevic R (2013) Numerical modeling of heat distribution in the electron beam melting ® of Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Sci Eng 135:061010. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gusarov AV, Laoui T, Froyen L, Titov VI (2003) Contact thermal conductivity of a powder bed in selective laser sintering. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:1103–1109. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cheng B, Price S, Lydon J, Cooper K (2014) On process temperature in powder-bed electron beam additive manufacturing: model development and validation. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chahine G, Atharifar H, Smith P (2009) Design optimization of a customized dental implant manufactured via electron beam melting. Int Solid Free Fabr Symp 631–640Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mills KC (2002) Recommended values of thermophysical properties for selected commercial alloys. Woodhead Publishing Limited, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Welsch G, Boyer R, Collings EW (1993) Materials properties handbook: titanium alloys. ASM international. Accesed May 2018
  28. 28.
    Gaytan SM, Murr LE, Medina F, Martinez E, Lopez MI, Wicker RB (2009) Advanced metal powder based manufacturing of complex components by electron beam melting. Mater Technol 24:180–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Messler RW (2008) Principles of welding: processes, physics, chemistry, and metallurgy. John Wiley & Sons. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainan CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations