Advertisement

GEP- and ANN-based tool wear monitoring: a virtually sensing predictive platform for MQL-assisted milling of Inconel 690

  • Binayak Sen
  • Mozammel MiaEmail author
  • Uttam Kumar Mandal
  • Sankar Prasad Mondal
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Inconel 690 is an extensively used superalloy in the aerospace and nuclear industries. Owing to the low thermal conductivity and poor machinability, the cutting tools are severely affected during the milling of Inconel 690. Thus, the machining of such superalloys consumes an extensive cost and time. In this context, an artificial intelligence–assisted cost-effective meta-model has been established in this manuscript for the accurate prediction of maximum flank wear. Here, a series of experiment was conducted on Inconel 690 using a TiAlN-coated solid carbide insert. Afterward, using the main effect plot (MEP) diagram, the effects of machining parameters on flank wear were evaluated. Additionally, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that the MQL flow rate is the most significant parameter affecting the flank wear. In the second part, 70% of machining output has been selected for training the gene expression programming (GEP) and artificial neural network (ANN) model, and the rest 30% data has been used for testing purpose. Furthermore, considering a statistical platform, the GEP model has been compared with an ANN model. The comparative analysis demonstrated that the GEP meta-model is superior to the ANN model in predicting the maximum flank wear under MQL environment. The outcomes of this study can aid the metal cutting industries to better plan the machining system on the perspective of the tool wear reduction with optimized parameters levels.

Keywords

Inconel 690 MQL-milling Flank wear GEP ANN 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Gupta MK, Mia M, Pruncu CI, Kapłonek W, Nadolny K, Patra K, Mikolajczyk T, Pimenov DY, Sarikaya M, Sharma VS (2019) Parametric optimization and process capability analysis for machining of nickel-based superalloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(9):3995–4009.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03453-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cai XJ, Liu ZQ, Chen M, An QL (2012) An experimental investigation on effects of minimum quantity lubrication oil supply rate in high-speed end milling of Ti–6Al–4V. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226(11):1784–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh G, Gupta MK, Mia M, Sharma VS (2018) Modeling and optimization of tool wear in MQL-assisted milling of Inconel 718 superalloy using evolutionary techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1):481–494.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1911-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jawaid A, Koksal S, Sharif S (2001) Cutting performance and wear characteristics of PVD coated and uncoated carbide tools in face milling Inconel 718 aerospace alloy. J Mater Process Technol 116(1):2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li H, Zeng H, Chen X (2006) An experimental study of tool wear and cutting force variation in the end milling of Inconel 718 with coated carbide inserts. J Mater Process Technol 180(1–3):296–304Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng G, Zhao J, Cheng X, Xu R, Zhao G (2016) Experimental investigation on sialon ceramic inserts for ultra-high-speed milling of Inconel 718. Mater Manuf Process 31(5):633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuppuswamy R, Zunega J, Naidoo S (2017) Flank wear assessment on discrete machining process behavior for Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):2097–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Darshan C, Jain S, Dogra M, Gupta MK, Mia M (2019) Machinability improvement in Inconel-718 by enhanced tribological and thermal environment using textured tool. J Therm Anal Calorim.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08121-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta M, Pruncu C, Mia M, Singh G, Singh S, Prakash C, Sood P, Gill H (2018) Machinability investigations of Inconel-800 super alloy under sustainable cooling conditions. Materials 11(11).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kamata Y, Obikawa T (2007) High speed MQL finish-turning of Inconel 718 with different coated tools. J Mater Process Technol 192-193:281–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaynak Y (2014) Evaluation of machining performance in cryogenic machining of Inconel 718 and comparison with dry and MQL machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(5–8):919–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang S, Li JF, Wang YW (2012) Tool life and cutting forces in end milling Inconel 718 under dry and minimum quantity cooling lubrication cutting conditions. J Clean Prod 32:81–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stephenson DA, Skerlos SJ, King AS, Supekar SD (2014) Rough turning Inconel 750 with supercritical CO2-based minimum quantity lubrication. J Mater Process Technol 214(3):673–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mia M, Khan MA, Dhar NR (2017) Study of surface roughness and cutting forces using ANN, RSM, and ANOVA in turning of Ti-6Al-4V under cryogenic jets applied at flank and rake faces of coated WC tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(1):975–991.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0566-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ranganathan S, Senthilvelan T, Sriram G (2010) Evaluation of machining parameters of hot turning of stainless steel (type 316) by applying ANN and RSM. Mater Manuf Process 25(10):1131–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mia M, Dhar NR (2016) Prediction of surface roughness in hard turning under high pressure coolant using artificial neural network. Measurement 92:464–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palanisamy D, Senthil P (2017) Development of ANFIS model and machinability study on dry turning of cryo-treated PH stainless steel with various inserts. Mater Manuf Process 32(6):654–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shivakoti I, Kibria G, Pradhan PM, Pradhan BB, Sharma A (2019) ANFIS based prediction and parametric analysis during turning operation of stainless steel 202. Mater Manuf Process 34(1):112–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bhowmik S, Paul A, Panua R, Ghosh SK, Debroy D (2019) Artificial intelligence based gene expression programming (GEP) model prediction of Diesel engine performances and exhaust emissions under Diesosenol fuel strategies. Fuel 235:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gandomi AH, Alavi AH, Gandomi M, Kazemi S (2017) Formulation of shear strength of slender RC beams using gene expression programming, part II: With shear reinforcement. Measurement 95:367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, Sadiq IO, Oyewole A (2014) Vegetable-oil based metalworking fluids research developments for machining processes: survey, applications and challenges. Manuf Rev 1:22Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mannekote JK, Kailas SV (2009) Studies on boundary lubrication properties of oxidised coconut and soy bean oils. Lubr Sci 21(9):355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghani JA, Jamaluddin H, Rahman M, Deros BM (2013) Philosophy of Taguchi approach and method in design of experiment. Asian Journal of Scientific Research 6(1):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khan A, Jamil M, Mia M, Pimenov D, Gasiyarov V, Gupta M, He N (2018) Multi-objective optimization for grinding of AISI D2 steel with Al2O3 wheel under MQL. Materials 11(11).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koza JR (1995) Survey of genetic algorithms and genetic programming. In: Wescon conference record. WESTERN PERIODICALS COMPANY, Indianapolis, pp 589–594Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. arXiv preprint cs/0102027Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guven A (2009) Linear genetic programming for time-series modelling of daily flow rate. J Earth Syst Sci 118(2):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang Y, Li X, Jiang P, Zhang L 2011 Prediction of surface roughness in end milling with gene expression programming. In: Proceedings of the 41st international conference on computers & industrial engineering, pp 441–446Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fallahpour A, Moghassem A (2013) Yarn strength modelling using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and gene expression programming (GEP). J Eng Fibers Fabr 8(4):155892501300800409Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mia M, Dhar NR (2016) Response surface and neural network based predictive models of cutting temperature in hard turning. J Adv Res 7(6):1035–1044.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2016.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pontes FJ, Ferreira JR, Silva MB, Paiva AP, Balestrassi PP (2010) Artificial neural networks for machining processes surface roughness modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(9–12):879–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rao S (1986) Tool wear monitoring through the dynamics of stable turning. J Eng Ind 108(3):183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bhatt A, Attia H, Vargas R, Thomson V (2010) Wear mechanisms of WC coated and uncoated tools in finish turning of Inconel 718. Tribol Int 43(5–6):1113–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ranganath S, Guo C, Holt S (2009) Experimental investigations into the carbide cracking phenomenon on Inconel 718 superalloy material. In: ASME 2009 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Junior ASA, Sales WF, da Silva RB, Costa ES, Machado ÁR (2017) Lubri-cooling and tribological behavior of vegetable oils during milling of AISI 1045 steel focusing on sustainable manufacturing. J Clean Prod 156:635–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Motorcu AR, Kuş A, Arslan R, Tekin Y, Ezentaş R (2013) Evaluation of tool life-tool wear in milling of Inconel 718 superalloy and the investigation of effects of cutting parameters on surface roughness with Taguchi method. Tehnicki vjesnik/Technical Gazette 20:5Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Astakhov VP (2007) Effects of the cutting feed, depth of cut, and workpiece (bore) diameter on the tool wear rate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34(7–8):631–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dhar N, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M (2006) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 172(2):299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mia M (2018) Mathematical modeling and optimization of MQL assisted end milling characteristics based on RSM and Taguchi method. Measurement 121:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yıldırım ÇV, Kıvak T, Sarıkaya M, Erzincanlı F (2017) Determination of MQL parameters contributing to sustainable machining in the milling of nickel-base superalloy waspaloy. Arab J Sci Eng 42(11):4667–4681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sarıkaya M, Güllü A (2015) Multi-response optimization of minimum quantity lubrication parameters using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis in turning of difficult-to-cut alloy Haynes 25. J Clean Prod 91:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hong T, Jeong K, Koo C (2018) An optimized gene expression programming model for forecasting the national CO2 emissions in 2030 using the metaheuristic algorithms. Appl Energy 228:808–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dey P, Das AK (2016) A utilization of GEP (gene expression programming) metamodel and PSO (particle swarm optimization) tool to predict and optimize the forced convection around a cylinder. Energy 95:447–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Roy S, Ghosh A, Das AK, Banerjee R (2015) Development and validation of a GEP model to predict the performance and exhaust emission parameters of a CRDI assisted single cylinder diesel engine coupled with EGR. Appl Energy 140:52–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Deb M, Majumder P, Majumder A, Roy S, Banerjee R (2016) Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in characterization of the performance–emission profile of a single cylinder CI engine operating with hydrogen in dual fuel mode: an ANN approach with fuzzy-logic based topology optimization. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(32):14330–14350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Theil H (1971) Applied economic forecastingGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chen Z, Yang Y (2004-2010) Assessing forecast accuracy measures. Preprint Series 2010:2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Binayak Sen
    • 1
  • Mozammel Mia
    • 2
    Email author
  • Uttam Kumar Mandal
    • 1
  • Sankar Prasad Mondal
    • 3
  1. 1.Production EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyAgartalaIndia
  2. 2.Mechanical and Production EngineeringAhsanullah University of Science and TechnologyDhakaBangladesh
  3. 3.Department of Natural ScienceMaulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, West BengalHaringhataIndia

Personalised recommendations