Advertisement

Design and validation of a headstock prototype for dry EDM drilling

  • M. GoioganaEmail author
  • O. Flaño
  • J. A. Sarasua
  • J. M. Ramos
  • L. Echavarri
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Electrical discharge machining (EDM) process is very appreciated in the manufacturing of conductive parts with complex geometry. Nonetheless, the use of liquids as a dielectric medium between electrode and workpiece involves important constraints to the EDM machine design concept. Many research works have been carried out using different gases as dielectric medium, the so-called dry EDM. However, further technical developments are required for industrial applicability. The present work proposes an exchangeable headstock prototype for dry EDM machining designed with the intention of evaluating the process potential in industrial applications. Considering the process parameters of spindle speed, gas dielectric flow rate, and electrode diameter, the new exchangeable headstock is capable to cover the most state-of-the-art research works. Moreover, with the designed prototype, dry EDM drilling tests were carried out for its validation, and the effect of spindle speed (500–5000 rpm), gas dielectric flow rate (240–440 l/min), and electrode cross section and material were evaluated in terms of machining speed (MS), tool wear rate (TWR), geometric accuracy, and surface integrity. These validation tests were realized using compressed air as dielectric medium and AISI 1045 steel workpiece. The results demonstrated the proper functioning of the new headstock. Besides, the validation tests showed the MS was increased with the increment of the air flow rate, the TWR mostly depends on the electrode material and no relationship between the process parameters and geometric accuracy and surface integrity.

Keywords

Dry electrical discharge machining Headstock prototype Machining speed Tool wear rate Surface integrity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

In addition, the authors gratefully acknowledge the technical help provided by ONA Electroerosión S.A and Ms. Elena Cerezal, Mr. Gaxan Cortazar, Mr. Josu Leunda, Mr. Ivan Saez, and Dr. Eva Rodriguez from IK4-Tekniker, Spain.

Funding information

The authors thank the Ministry for Economic Development and Competitiveness and the Department of Industry, Innovation, Trade and Tourism of the Basque Government, as well as the European Regional Development Fund for the financial support of this work, which is part of the ELECO project, developed under the HAZITEK program.

References

  1. 1.
    Uhlmann E, Piltz S, Doll U (2005) Machining of micro/miniature dies and moulds by electrical discharge machining—recent development. J Mater Process Technol 167:488–493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chakraborty S, Dey V, Ghosh SK (2015) A review on the use of dielectric fluids and their effects in electrical discharge machining characteristics. Precis Eng 40:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu Z, Jun T, Masanori K (2004) Dry electrical discharge machining of cemented carbide. J Mater Process Technol 149:353–357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jagadish AR (2015) Multi-Objective Optimization of Green EDM: An Integrated Theory. J Inst Eng India Ser C 96:41–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-014-0142-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valaki JB, Rathod PP (2016) Assessment of operational feasibility of waste vegetable oil based bio-dielectric fluid for sustainable electric discharge machining (EDM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:1509–1518.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7169-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leão FN, Pashby IR (2004) A review on the use of environmentally-friendly dielectric fluids in electrical discharge machining. J Mater Process Technol 149:341–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skrabalak G, Kozak J, Zybura M (2013) Optimization of Dry EDM Milling Process. Procedia CIRP 6:332–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kunieda M, Lauwers B, Rajurkar KP, Schumacher BM (2005) Advancing EDM through Fundamental Insight into the Process. CIRP Ann 54:64–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60020-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skrabalak G, Kozak J (2010) Study on Dry Electrical Discharge Machining. In: World Congr. Eng WCE, London, p 2010Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kunieda M, Yoshida M, Taniguchi N (1997) Electrical Discharge Machining in Gas. CIRP Ann 46:143–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60794-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang QH, Zhang JH, Deng JX, Qin Y, Niu ZW (2002) Ultrasonic vibration electrical discharge machining in gas. J Mater Process Technol 129:135–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00596-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu ZB, Takahashi J, Nakajima N, Sano S, Kunieda M (2005) Feasibility of 3-D surface machining by Dry EDM. Int J Electr Mach 10:15–20.  https://doi.org/10.2526/ijem.10.15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kunieda M, Miyoshi Y, Takaya T, Nakajima N, ZhanBo Y, Yoshida M (2003) High Speed 3D Milling by Dry EDM. CIRP Ann 52:147–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60552-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beşliu I, Schulze H-P, Coteaţă M, Amarandei D (2010) Study on the dry electrical discharge machining. Int J Mater Form 3:1107–1110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0965-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uhlmann E, Schimmelpfennig T-M, Perfilov I, Streckenbach J, Schweitzer L (2016) Comparative analysis of dry-EDM and conventional EDM for the manufacturing of micro holes in Si3N4-TiN. Procedia CIRP 42:173–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saha SK, Choudhury SK (2009) Experimental investigation and empirical modeling of the dry electric discharge machining process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:297–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin YJ, Lin YC, Wang AC, Chen YF, Chow HM (2011) Machining characteristics of EDM using gas media. Adv Mater Res 189–193:3123–3130.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.189-193.3123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shirguppikar SS, Dabade UA (2018) Experimental investigation of dry electric discharge machining (Dry EDM) Process on Bright Mild Steel. Mater Today Proc 5:7595–7603.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Govindan P, Joshi SS (2012) Analysis of micro-cracks on machined surfaces in dry electrical discharge machining. J Manuf Process 14:277–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Puthumana G, Joshi SS (2011) Investigations into performance of dry EDM using slotted electrodes. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 12:957–963.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0128-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shen Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Dong H, Sun W, Wang X, Zheng C, Ji R (2015) High-speed dry electrical discharge machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 93:19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roth R, Balzer H, Kuster F, Wegener K (2012) Influence of the anode material on the breakdown behavior in dry electrical discharge machining. Procedia CIRP 1:639–644.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roth R, Kuster F, Wegener K (2013) Influence of oxidizing gas on the stability of dry electrical discharge machining process. Procedia CIRP 6:338–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fattahi S, Baseri H (2017) Analysis of dry electrical discharge machining in different dielectric mediums. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 231:497–512.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408915611540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin Y-C, Hung J-C, Chow H-M, Wang A-C, Chen J-T (2016) Machining characteristics of a hybrid process of EDM in gas combined with ultrasonic vibration and AJM. Procedia CIRP 42:167–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kurniawan R, Thirumalai Kumaran S, Arumuga Prabu V, Zhen Y, Park KM, Kwak YI, Mofizul Islam M, Ko TJ (2017) Measurement of burr removal rate and analysis of machining parameters in ultrasonic assisted dry EDM (US-EDM) for deburring drilled holes in CFRP composite. Measurement. 110:98–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liqing L, Yingjie S (2013) Study of dry EDM with oxygen-mixed and cryogenic cooling approaches. Procedia CIRP 6:344–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Macedo FTB, Wiessner M, Hollenstein C, Esteves PMB, Wegener K (2017) Fundamental investigation of dry electrical discharge machining (DEDM) by optical emission spectroscopy and its numerical interpretation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:3697–3709.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9687-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tao J, Shih AJ, Ni J (2008) Experimental study of the dry and near-dry electrical discharge milling processes. J Manuf Sci Eng 130:011002.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2784276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang Y, Liu Y, Shen Y, Ji R, Li Z, Zheng C (2014) Investigation on the influence of the dielectrics on the material removal characteristics of EDM. J Mater Process Technol 214:1052–1061.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Macedo FTB, Wiessner M, Hollenstein C, Kuster F, Wegener K (2016) Investigation of the fundamentals of tool electrode wear in dry EDM. Procedia CIRP 46:55–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maradia U, Knaak R, Dal Busco W, Boccadoro M, Wegener K (2015) A strategy for low electrode wear in meso–micro-EDM. Precis Eng 42:302–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2015.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Newton TR, Melkote SN, Watkins TR, Trejo RM, Reister L (2009) Investigation of the effect of process parameters on the formation and characteristics of recast layer in wire-EDM of Inconel 718. Mater Sci Eng A 513–514:208–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Manufacturing Technologies UnitIK4-TeknikerEibarSpain
  2. 2.ONA Electroerosión S.A.DurangoSpain

Personalised recommendations