Investigation of springback during electromagnetic-assisted bending of aluminium alloy sheet

  • Wang Xiao
  • Liang HuangEmail author
  • Jianjun Li
  • Hongliang Su
  • Fei Feng
  • Fei Ma


Electromagnetic-assisted forming (EMAF) combining quasi-static stamping and electromagnetic forming (EMF) is a potential method for controlling the springback of aluminium alloy materials. In this study, to further promote the application of EMAF in the high-precision forming of aluminium alloy sheet parts, the springback during electromagnetic-assisted bending of aluminium alloy sheet was investigated using a custom-designed U-shaped bending tool with the optimised curved spiral coils. Two types of conditions to control springback were designed: gapless and gap conditions, and the springback under these conditions was studied both experimentally and using numerical simulations. In addition, the effects of the discharge parameters on springback were analysed. Finally, the mechanism for controlling springback under different forming conditions was revealed. The results showed that the efficiency of springback control was significantly higher under gap conditions compared with gapless condition. With increasing gap, the springback angle decreased, but negative springback easily occurred when using excessively wide gaps. As the discharge voltage or number of discharges increased, the tangential stress of the fillet area decreased, thereby reducing the springback angle. Stress oscillations under the gapless condition reduced the tangential stress of the fillet area to a certain extent, while inertial motions under gap conditions greatly reduced the tangential stress, which were the essential mechanism for the observed springback reduction.


Aluminium alloy Electromagnetic-assisted bending Springback Coil design Forming gap 


Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 51575206 and 51705169); the Innovation Funds for Aerospace Science and Technology from China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (grant number CASC150704); the Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body (grant number 31615006); and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University (grant number 2016YXZD055).


  1. 1.
    Li J, Li L, Wan M, Yu H, Liu L (2018) Innovation applications of electromagnetic forming and its fundamental problems. Procedia Manuf 15:14–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim HS, Koc M (2008) Numerical investigations on springback characteristics of aluminum sheet metal alloys in warm forming conditions. J Mater Process Technol 204(1–3):370–383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tekiner Z (2004) An experimental study on the examination of springback of sheet metals with several thicknesses and properties in bending dies. J Mater Process Technol 145(1):109–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Su C, Zhang K, Lou S, Xu T, Wang Q (2017) Effects of variable blank holder forces and a controllable drawbead on the springback of shallow-drawn TA2M titanium alloy boxes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):1627–1635. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moon YH, Kang SS, Cho JR, Kim TG (2003) Effect of tool temperature on the reduction of the springback of aluminum sheets. J Mater Process Technol 132(1–3):365–368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Psyk V, Risch D, Kinsey BL, Tekkaya AE, Kleinera A (2011) Electromagnetic forming—a review. J Mater Process Technol 211(5):787–829. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu X, Huang L, Su H, Ma F, Li J (2018) Comparative research on the rebound effect in direct electromagnetic forming and indirect electromagnetic forming with an elastic medium. Materials 11(8):1450. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang Z, Huang L, Li J, Li X, Zhu H, Ma F, Ma H, Cui J (2018) Microstructure and properties of friction stir welded 2219 aluminum alloy under heat treatment and electromagnetic forming process. Metals 8(5):305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas JD, Seth M, Daehn GS, Bradley JR, Triantafyllidisa N (2007) Forming limits for electromagnetically expanded aluminum alloy tubes: theory and experiment. Acta Mater 55(8):2863–2873. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma H, Huang L, Li J, Duan X, Ma F (2018) Effects of process parameters on electromagnetic sheet free forming of aluminum alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1–4):359–369. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu H, Huang L, Wang Z, Li J, Ma H, Su H (2019) Fracture behaviour of laser-welded 2219-T6 aluminium alloy under pulsed Lorentz force. J Mater Sci 54(13):9857–9874. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu H, Chen J, Liu W, Yin H, Li C (2018) Electromagnetic forming of aluminum circular tubes into square tubes: experiment and numerical simulation. J Manuf Process 31:613–623. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li H, Yao X, Yan S, He J, Zhan M, Huang L (2018) Analysis of forming defects in electromagnetic incremental forming of a large-size thin-walled ellipsoid surface part of aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol 255:703–715. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Q, Huang L, Li J, Feng F, Su H, Ma F, Zhong K (2019) Investigation of dynamic deformation behaviour of large-size sheet metal parts under local Lorentz force. J Mater Process Technol 265:20–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Su H, Huang L, Li J, Ma F, Huang P, Feng F (2018) Two-step electromagnetic forming: a new forming approach to local features of large-size sheet metal parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 124:99–116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vohnout VJ (1998) A hybrid quasi-static/dynamic process for forming large sheet metal parts from aluminum alloys. Dissertation, The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shang J, Daehn G (2011) Electromagnetically assisted sheet metal stamping. J Mater Process Technol 211(5):868–874. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li G, Deng H, Mao Y, Zhang X, Cui J (2018) Study on AA5182 aluminum sheet formability using combined quasi-static-dynamic tensile processes. J Mater Process Technol 255:373–386. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Golovashchenko SF (2005) Springback calibration using pulsed electromagnetic field. AIP Conf Proc 778(1):284–285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu D, Zhou W, Li C (2013) Springback control and deformation analysis for electromagnetically assisted bending of U-shaped parts. Chin J Nonferrous Met 11:3075–3082. (In Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iriondo E, Alcaraz JL, Daehn GS, Gutiérrez MA, Jimbert P (2013) Shape calibration of high strength metal sheets by electromagnetic forming. J Manuf Process 15(2):183–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cui X, Yu H, Wang Q (2018) Electromagnetic impulse calibration in V-shaped parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(5–8):2959–2968. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luo W, Huang L, Li J, Liu X, Wang Z (2014) A novel multi-layer coil for a large and thick-walled component by electromagnetic forming. J Mater Process Technol 214(11):2811–2819. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noh HG, Song WJ, Kang BS, Kim J (2015) Two-step electromagnetic forming process using spiral forming coils to deform sheet metal in a middle-block die. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(9–12):1691–1703. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hallquist JO (2006) LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation(LSTC) 3:1–40.
  26. 26.
    Zhu H, Huang L, Li J, Li X, Ma H, Wang C, Ma F (2018) Strengthening mechanism in laser-welded 2219 aluminium alloy under the cooperative effects of aging treatment and pulsed electromagnetic loadings. Mater Sci Eng A 714:124–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu X, Huang L, Li J, Su H (2019) An electromagnetic incremental forming (EMIF) strategy for large-scale parts of aluminum alloy based on dual coil. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li J, Qiu W, Huang L, Su H, Tao H, Li P (2018) Gradient electromagnetic forming (GEMF): a new forming approach for variable-diameter tubes by use of sectional coil. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 135:65–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jimbert P, Eguia I, Perez I, Gutiérrez MA, Hurtado I (2011) Analysis and comparative study of factors affecting quality in the hemming of 6016T4AA performed by means of electromagnetic forming and process characterization. J Mater Process Technol 211(5):916–924. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu D, Li C, Yu H (2009) Numerical modeling and deformation analysis for electromagnetically assisted deep drawing of AA5052 sheet. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 19(5):1294–1302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhu Y, Liu Y, Yang H, Li H (2012) Development and application of the material constitutive model in springback prediction of cold-bending. Mater Des 42:245–258. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wang Xiao
    • 1
  • Liang Huang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jianjun Li
    • 1
  • Hongliang Su
    • 1
  • Fei Feng
    • 1
  • Fei Ma
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Changzheng Machinery FactoryChina Aerospace Science and Technology CorporationChengduChina

Personalised recommendations