Advertisement

A predictive maintenance cost model for CNC SMEs in the era of industry 4.0

  • Kwaku Adu-Amankwa
  • Ashraf K.A. Attia
  • Mukund Nilakantan JanardhananEmail author
  • Imran Patel
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Within the subject area of maintenance and maintenance management, authors identified a deficiency in studies focussing on the expected value from adopting predictive maintenance (PdM) techniques for machine tools (MTs). Authors identified no studies focussing on presenting a PdM value analysis or cost model specifically for small-medium enterprises (SMEs) operating computer numerically controlled (CNC) MTs. This paper’s novelty is addressing SMEs’ minimal representation in literature by explanatorily collecting data from SMEs within the focal area via surveys, modelling and analysing datasets, then proposes a cost-effective PdM system architecture for SME CNC machine shops that predicts cost savings ranging from £22,804 to £48,585 over a range of 1–50 CNC MTs maintained on a distributed numerically controlled (DNC) network. It affirms PdM’s tangible value creation for SME CNC machine shops with predicted positive impacts on their MT cost and performance drivers. These exploratory research findings corroborate SMEs pooling together to optimise their CNC MT maintenance cost through the recommended system architecture. Finally, it introduces opportunities for further PdM research taking into account SMEs’ perspective. The paper’s industrial application is confirmed from the surveyed SMEs that demonstrated their current utility of PdM; then anonymous positive feedback on the online dashboard, shared with participant companies, confirmed the research results supported SMEs in considering exploring the path to adapting PdM. It is anticipated that beneficiaries of this research will be maintenance managers, business executives and researchers who seek to understand the expected financial and performance impact of adopting PdM for a MT’s overall life cycle costs.

Keywords

Industry 4.0 Predictive maintenance Machine maintenance cost Machine tool 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to appreciate the colleagues Macvil J. Carvalho and Sumit Dilip Pawale for their assistance with data collection.

References

  1. 1.
    Ross S (2008) The industrial revolution. Evans, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    More C (2000) Understanding the industrial revolution. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freeman C, Louça F (2001) As time goes by: from the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwab K (2017) The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Publishing Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laird K (2017) Understanding the digital transformation called industry 4.0. Plast Eng 73:24–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bokrantz J, Skoogh A, Berlin C, Stahre J (2017) Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing: Delphi-based scenarios for 2030. Int J Prod Econ 191:154–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selcuk S (2017) Predictive maintenance, its implementation and latest trends. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231:1670–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mourtzis D, Vlachou E (2018) A cloud-based cyber-physical system for adaptive shop-floor scheduling and condition-based maintenance. J Manuf Syst 47:179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Monostori L, Kádár B, Bauernhansl T, Kondoh S, Kumara S, Reinhart G, Sauer O, Schuh G, Sihn W, Ueda K (2016) Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:621–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peng Y, Dong M, Zuo MJ (2010) Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:297–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toh KTK, Newman ST (1996) The future role of DNC in metalworking SMEs. Int J Prod Res 34:863–877CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruschel E, Santos EAP, Loures E d FR (2017) Industrial maintenance decision-making: A systematic literature review. J Manuf Syst 45:180–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garg A, Deshmukh SG (2006) Maintenance management: literature review and directions. J Qual Maint Eng 12:205–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ridgway K, Clegg CW, and Williams DJ (2013) The factory of the future - (Future of Manufacturing Project: Evidence Paper 29).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    March ST, Scudder GD (2017) Predictive maintenance: strategic use of IT in manufacturing organizations. Inf Syst Front:1–15Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haroun AE (2015) Maintenance cost estimation: application of activity-based costing as a fair estimate method. J Qual Maint Eng 21:258–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mobley RK (2002) An introduction to predictive maintenance, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Platfoot R (2014) Practical analytics for maintenance teams using computerised maintenance management system work history. Australian Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Engineering 11:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Galar D, Sandborn PA, Kumar U (2017) Maintenance costs and life cycle cost analysis. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang Z, Wang Y, Wang K (2013) Fault diagnosis and prognosis using wavelet packet decomposition, Fourier transform and artificial neural network. J Intell Manuf 24:1213–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, J., Wang, P., and Gao, R.X. (2013). Tool life prediction for sustainable manufacturing. In 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, G. Seliger, ed. (Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin), pp. 230–234.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baheti R, and Gill H (2011) Cyber-physical systems. In The Impact of Control Technology, T. Samad and A. M. Annaswamy, eds. (IEEE Control Systems Society), pp. 161–166.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    MacDougall W (2014) Industrie 4.0: smart manufacturing for the future, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu C, Vengayil H, Zhong RY, Xu X (2018) A systematic development method for cyber-physical machine tools. J Manuf Syst 48:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-AA (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2014) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an Industry 4.0 perspective. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering 8:37–44Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    IBM (2016). Are your preventive maintenance efforts wrenching away precious resources? Time to listen to your machines.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mobley RK (2001) Plant Engineer’s Handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann, BostonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parida A, Kumar U, Galar D, and Stenström C (2015) Performance measurement and management for maintenance: a literature review.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kans M, Ingwald A (2008) Common database for cost-effective improvement of maintenance performance. Int J Prod Econ 113:734–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Enparantza R, Revilla O, Azkarate A, Zendoia J (2006) A life cycle cost calculation and management system for machine tools. 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering 2, pp 717–722Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reina A, Kocsis Á, Merlo A, Németh I, Aggogeri F (2016) Maintenance decision support for manufacturing systems based on the minimization of the life cycle cost. Procedia CIRP 57:674–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cheng T, Zhang J, Hu C, Wu B, Yang S (2001) Intelligent machine tools in a distributed network manufacturing mode environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bryman A, Bell E (2011) Business research methods 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdalezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Panik MJ (2012) Statistical inference: a short course. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Curwin J, Slater R (2013) Quantitative methods for business decisions, 6th edn. Andover: Thomson LearningGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics 5th ed. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Robertson J (2012) Likert-type scales, statistical methods, and effect sizes. Commun ACM 55:6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wilkinson L (2006) Revising the Pareto chart. Am Stat 60:332–334MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Todman JB, and Dugard P (2001) Single-case and small-n experimental designs 1st ed. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mislick GK, Nussbaum DA (2015) Cost estimation: methods and tools. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bawa HS (2004) Manuacturing processes. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shagluf A, Longstaff AP, Fletcher S (2015) Derivation of a cost model to aid management of CNC machine tool accuracy maintenance. Journal of Machine Engineering 15:17–43Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shagluf A, Parkinson S, Longstaff AP, Fletcher S (2018) Adaptive decision support for suggesting a machine tool maintenance strategy. J Qual Maint Eng 24:376–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ungureanu AL, Stan G, Butunoi PA (2016) Reducing maintenance costs in agreement with CNC machine tools reliability. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 145:1–6Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Houshyar A (2005) Reliability and maintainability of machinery and equipment, part 2: benchmarking, life-cyclecost, and predictive maintenance. Int J Model Simul 25:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Houshyar A (2004) Reliability and maintainability of machinery and equipment, part 1: accessibility and assessing machine tool R&M performance. Int J Model Simul 24:201–210CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Okoh C, Roy R, Mehnen J (2017) Predictive maintenance modelling for through-life engineering services. Procedia CIRP 59:196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gu C, He Y, Han X, and Xie M (2017) Comprehensive cost oriented predictive maintenance based on mission reliability for a manufacturing system. In 2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) (Orlando: IEEE), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Needy KL, Nachtmann H, Roztocki N, Warner RC, Bidanda B (2003) Implementing activity-based costing systems in small manufacturing firms: a field study. Eng Manag J 15:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Patil RB, Kothavale BS, Waghmode LY, Joshi SG (2017) Reliability analysis of CNC turning center based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 34:1616–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Moeuf A, Pellerin R, Lamouri S, Tamayo-Giraldo S, Barbaray R (2018) The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. Int J Prod Res 56:1118–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vishwakarma G (2017) Sample size and power calculation. In: Research Methodology, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kim, J.H. (2015). How to choose the level of significance: a pedagogical note how to choose the level of significance: a pedagogical note.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Figueiredo Filho DB, Paranhos R, da Rocha EC, Batista M, da Silva JA Jr, Santos D, M.L.W, Marino JG, da Rocha EC, Batista M, da Silva JA Jr et al (2013) When is statistical significance not significant? Brazilian Political Science Review 7:31–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yip PSLL, Tsang EWKK (2007) Interpreting dummy variables and their interaction effects in strategy research. Strateg Organ 5:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Searle SR, Udell JG (1970) The Use of Regression on Dummy Variables in Management Research. Manag Sci 16:B–397-B-409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Marais KB, Saleh JH (2009) Beyond its cost, the value of maintenance: an analytical framework for capturing its net present value. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:644–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wright O (2018) Business population estimates for the UK and regions 2018, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kwaku Adu-Amankwa
    • 1
  • Ashraf K.A. Attia
    • 2
  • Mukund Nilakantan Janardhanan
    • 2
    Email author
  • Imran Patel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering ManagementUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department of EngineeringUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations