Advertisement

A novel approach to recognize interacting features for manufacturability evaluation of prismatic parts with orthogonal features

  • Manish Kumar Gupta
  • Abinash Kumar SwainEmail author
  • Pramod Kumar Jain
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 134 Downloads

Abstract

This paper describes a computer-aided tool for the quantitative evaluation of manufacturability of prismatic machining parts. A feature recognition approach, which uses volume subtraction and syntactic pattern recognition techniques, is proposed to identify machining features on a prismatic part from B-Rep data extracted from 3D model in STEP AP203 format. The methodology presented is also capable of identifying features in variety cases of feature interactions. The manufacturability of a part is expressed in terms of relative manufacturability indices of its constituting features. The present work considers the geometrical aspects of the designed product along with manufacturing issues at a very early stage of design. Geometrical and technological complexities of the design are established using several parameters such as feature intricacy, tool access direction, feature face orientation, feature accessibility, approach direction depth, feature neighborhood, feature hierarchy, parent and child feature complexities, tolerances, surface finish, and tooling complexities which affect the manufacturability of a feature on the part directly or indirectly. The best worst method (BWM) is used to assign weights to manufacturability parameters to reflect their relative importance. A case study is presented to show the capability of the system to generate sound indices that could make designs easier to manufacture without compromising on the functional requirements.

Keywords

Feature recognition Volume subtraction Face adjacency matrix Manufacturability Geometrical complexity Technological complexity 

Notes

Funding information

The authors received financial support from the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, to carry out the research work.

References

  1. 1.
    Dana SN, Gupta SK (1994) Systematic approach for analyzing the manufacturability of machined parts. Comput Aided Des 27:323–342zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shukor SA, Axinte DA (2009) Manufacturability analysis system: issues and future trends. Int J Prod Res 47:1369–1390.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701589398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan DSK (2003) Expert system for product manufacturability and cost evaluation. Mater Manuf Process 18:313–322.  https://doi.org/10.1081/AMP-120018911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiang BC, Hsu C-H (2003) Development of a fuzzy decision model for manufacturability evaluation. J Intell Manuf 14:169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022999313271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang M, Kim G, Eum K, Park MW, Kim JK (2014) A classification of multi-axis features based on manufacturing process. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15:1255–1263.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0465-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amaitik SM, Kiliç SE (2007) An intelligent process planning system for prismatic parts using STEP features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:978–993.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0269-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borkar BR, Puri YM (2015) Automatic extraction of machining features from prismatic parts using STEP for downstream applications. J Inst Eng Ser C 96:231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-015-0171-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoque ASM, Halder PK, Parvez MS, Szecsi T (2013) Integrated manufacturing features and design-for-manufacture guidelines for reducing product cost under CAD/CAM environment. Comput Ind Eng 66:988–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babic B, Nesic N, Miljkovic Z (2008) A review of automated feature recognition with rule-based pattern recognition. Comput Ind 59:321–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yusof Y, Latif K (2014) Survey on computer-aided process planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:77–89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6073-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han JH, Pratt M, Regli WC (2000) Manufacturing feature recognition from solid models: a status report. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 16:782–796.  https://doi.org/10.1109/70.897789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joshi S, Chang TC (1988) Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3D solid model. Comput Des 20:58–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(88)90050-4 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ji Q, Marefat MM (2003) A Dempster–Shafer approach for recognizing machine features from CAD models. Pattern Recogn 36:1355–1368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00260-1 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li YG, Ding YF, Mou WP, Guo H (2010) Feature recognition technology for aircraft structural parts based on a holistic attribute adjacency graph. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 224:271–278.  https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM1634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lam SM, Wong TN (2000) Recognition of machining features - a hybrid approach. Int J Prod Res 38:4301–4316.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540050205109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ding L (2003) Feature technology and its applications in computer integrated manufacturingGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tseng Y-J, Joshi SB (1998) Recognition of interacting rotational and prismatic machining features from 3-D mill-turn parts. Int J Prod Res 36:3147–3165.  https://doi.org/10.1080/002075498192346 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sakurai H (1995) Volume decomposition and feature recognition: part 1—polyhedral objects. Comput Des 27:833–843.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(95)00007-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Woo Y, Sakurai H (2002) Recognition of maximal features by volume decomposition. Comput Des 34:195–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00080-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mascle C, Lu H, Maranzana R (2007) Machining process planning using decomposition of delta volume. 2007 IEEE Int Symp Assem Manuf IEEE, pp 106–11.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAM.2007.4288457
  21. 21.
    Sakurai H, Dave P (1996) Volume decomposition and feature recognition, part II: curved objects. Comput Des 28:519–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(95)00067-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sheen B-T, You C-F (n.d.) Machining feature recognition and tool-path generation for 3-axis CNC milling.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2005.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zulkifli AH, Meeran S (1999) Decomposition of interacting features using a Kohonen self-organizing feature map neural network. Eng Appl Artif Intell 12:59–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(98)00050-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang C, Chan KW, Chen YH (1998) A hybrid method for recognizing feature interactions. Integr Manuf Syst 9:120–128.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wong TN, Lam SM (2000) Automatic recognition of machining features from computer aided design part models. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 214:515–520.  https://doi.org/10.1243/0954405001517810 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rameshbabu V, Shunmugam MS (2009) Hybrid feature recognition method for setup planning from STEP AP-203. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 25:393–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2007.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vandenbrande JH, Requicha AAG (1993) Spatial reasoning for the automatic recognition of machinable features in solid models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15:1269–1285.  https://doi.org/10.1109/34.250845 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rahmani K, Arezoo B (2007) A hybrid hint-based and graph-based framework for recognition of interacting milling features. Comput Ind 58:304–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Venu B, Komma V, Srivastava D (2014) A new hybrid approach to recognize machinable features of prismatic parts from STEP AP 203 fileGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sunil VB, Agarwal R, Pande SS (2010) An approach to recognize interacting features from B-Rep CAD models of prismatic machined parts using a hybrid (graph and rule based) technique. Comput Ind 61:686–701.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2010.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nezis K, Vosniakos G (1997) Recognizing 212D shape features using a neural network and heuristics. Comput Des 29:523–539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(97)00003-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sunil VB, Pande SS (2009) Automatic recognition of machining features using artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:932–947.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1536-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poli C (2001) Design for manufacturing: a structured approach. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stoll HW (1986) Design for manufacture: an overview. Appl Mech Rev 39:1356.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3149526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bralla JG (1999) Design for manufacturability handbook, vol 11. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight WA, Dewhurst P, Knight WA (2001) Product design for manufacture and assembly, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded. vol. 20013021. CRC Press.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9780824741587
  37. 37.
    Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mohole A, Wright P, Séquin C (2002) WebCAD: a computer aided design tool constrained with explicit ‘design for manufacturability’ rules for computer numerical control milling. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 216:879–889.  https://doi.org/10.1243/095440502320193003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Subramaniam BL, Ulrich KT (1998) Producibility analysis using metrics based on physical process models. Res Eng Des 10:210–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001639870002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dumitrescu R and S T (2002) Implementing design for manufacture rules. Tech Pap Manuf EngGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gu Z, Zhang YF, Nee AYC (1997) Identification of important features for machining operations sequence generation. Int J Prod Res 35:2285–2308.  https://doi.org/10.1080/002075497194859 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gebresenbet T, Jain PK, Jain SC (2002) Preliminary manufacturability analysis using feature-function - resource considerations for cylindrical machined parts. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 15:361–378.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920110060401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ong SK, Sun MJ, Nee AYC (2003) A fuzzy set AHP-based DFM tool for rotational parts. J Mater Process Technol 138:223–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00076-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Syaimak AS, Axinte DA (2009) An approach of using primitive feature analysis in manufacturability analysis systems for micro-milling/drilling. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 22:727–744.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920802632176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kerbrat O, Mognol P, Hascoët JY (2011) A new DFM approach to combine machining and additive manufacturing. Comput Ind 62:684–692.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2011.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Korosec M, Balic J, Kopac J (2005) Neural network based manufacturability evaluation of free form machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:13–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.06.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sharma R, Gao JX (2007) A knowledge-based manufacturing and cost evaluation system for product design/re-design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:856–865.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0530-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Elgh F, Cederfeldt M (2007) Concurrent cost estimation as a tool for enhanced producibility—system development and applicability for producibility studies. Int J Prod Econ 109:12–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2006.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega (United Kingdom) 53:49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Open CASCADE technology: overview n.d. https://www.opencascade.com/doc/occt-7.0.0/overview/html/index.html (accessed March 25, 2018)
  51. 51.
    Hebbal SS, Mehta NK (2008) Setup planning for machining the features of prismatic parts. Int J Prod Res 46:3241–3257.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601070937 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Manafi D, Nategh MJ, Parvaz H (2017) Extracting the manufacturing information of machining features for computer-aided process planning systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231:2072–2083.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405415623487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shankar SR, Jansson DG (1993) A generalized methodology for evaluating manufacturability. Concurr. Eng., Boston, MA: Springer US, pp 248–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3062-6_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chase KW, Greenwood WH, Loosli BG, Hauglund LF (1990) Least cost tolerance allocation for mechanical assemblies with automated process selection. Manuf Rev 3:49–59Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dereli T, Filiz H (2002) A note on the use of STEP for interfacing design to process planning. CAD Comput Aided Des 34:1075–1085.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00187-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ong SK, Chew LC (2000) Evaluating the manufacturability of machined parts and their setup plans. Int J Prod Res 38:2397–2415.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540050031832 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ong SK, Nee AYC (1998) Manufacturability evaluation and generation of re-design suggestions for machined parts. J Manuf Sci Prod 1:87–106.  https://doi.org/10.1515/IJMSP.1998.1.2.87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Faraj I (2003) Manufacturing features: verification interaction accessibility and machinability. Int J Prod Res 41:2249–2272.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754031000090630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhu H, Menq C (2002) B-rep model simplification by automatic fillet/round suppressing for efficient automatic feature recognition. Comput Des 34:109–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00056-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hayasi MT, Asiabanpour B (2009) Extraction of manufacturing information from design-by-feature solid model through feature recognition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:1191–1203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1922-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Huang W, Hu Y, Cai L (2012) An effective hybrid graph and genetic algorithm approach to process planning optimization for prismatic parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:1219–1232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3870-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fu MW, Ong SK, Lu WF, Lee IBH, Nee AYC (2003) An approach to identify design and manufacturing features from a data exchanged part model. Comput Des 35:979–993.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(02)00160-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kim BC, Mun D (2015) Enhanced volume decomposition minimizing overlapping volumes for the recognition of design features. J Mech Sci Technol 29:5289–5298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-1131-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ong SK, Nee AYC (n.d.) Manufacturability evaluation and generation of re-design suggestions for machined parts. 87–106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manish Kumar Gupta
    • 1
  • Abinash Kumar Swain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pramod Kumar Jain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical & Industrial EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations