Advertisement

Optimization of variable helix cutter for improving chatter stability

  • Yu GuoEmail author
  • Bin Lin
  • Weiqiang Wang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Chatter during machining process causes tool wear, poor surface finish, limited metal removal rate, and limited productivity. Variable pitch/helix cutters can avoid the occurrence of regenerative chatter by disturbing the phase of vibration between adjacent teeth. However, if the pitch and helix angles are not properly selected, then the stability may be worse than that of a regular cutter. In this study, a stability model of variable helix milling is established, and a simple and effective optimization method is proposed. An index called “suppression factor” is proposed to measure stability quantitatively. In a given cutting parameter area, the best combination of pitch and helix angles improves the absolute stability of the variable helix cutter. The optimal variable helix cutter is customized. The correctness of the stability model and the effectiveness of the optimization method are verified by comparison experiments.

Keywords

Multi-delay Optimization Regenerative chatter Variable helix Variable pitch 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support of the “973” National Basic Research Program of China No. 2014CB046603.

References

  1. 1.
    Shirase K, Altintaş Y (1996) Cutting force and dimensional surface error generation in peripheral milling with variable pitch helical end mills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36:567–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sellmeier V, Denkena B (2011) Stable islands in the stability chart of milling processes due to unequal tooth pitch. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:152–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wan M, Zhang W-H, Dang J-W, Yang Y (2010) A unified stability prediction method for milling process with multiple delays. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Munoa J, Beudaert X, Dombovari Z, Altintas Y, Budak E, Brecher C, Stepan G (2016) Chatter suppression techniques in metal cutting. CIRP Ann 65:785–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Slavicek J (1965) The effect of irregular tooth pitch on stability of milling. In: Proc. of the 6th Int. MTDR ConfGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Opitz H (1966) Improvement of the dynamic stability of the milling process by irregular tooth pitch. In: Proc. 7th Int. MTDR ConfGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vanherck P (1967) Increasing milling machine productivity by use of cutters with non constant cutting edge pitch. In: Proceedings of the 8th MTDR conference, pp 947–960Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Altıntas Y, Engin S, Budak E (1999) Analytical stability prediction and design of variable pitch cutters. J Manuf Sci Eng 121:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Budak E (2003) An analytical design method for milling cutters with nonconstant pitch to increase stability, part 2: application. J Manuf Sci Eng 125:35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Budak E (2003) An analytical design method for milling cutters with nonconstant pitch to increase stability, part I: theory. J Manuf Sci Eng 125:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olgac N, Sipahi R (2007) Dynamics and stability of variable-pitch milling. J Vib Control 13:1031–1043CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Song Q, Ai X, Zhao J (2011) Design for variable pitch end mills with high milling stability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:891–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suzuki N, Kojima T, Hino R, Shamoto E (2012) A novel design method of irregular pitch cutters to attain simultaneous suppression of multi-mode regenerations. Procedia CIRP 4:98–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stépán G, Hajdu D, Iglesias A et al (2018) Ultimate capability of variable pitch milling cutters. CIRP Ann 67:373–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turner S, Merdol D, Altintas Y, Ridgway K (2007) Modelling of the stability of variable helix end mills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:1410–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sims ND, Mann B, Huyanan S (2008) Analytical prediction of chatter stability for variable pitch and variable helix milling tools. J Sound Vib 317:664–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jin G, Zhang Q, Qi H, Yan B (2014) A frequency-domain solution for efficient stability prediction of variable helix cutters milling. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 228:2702–2710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dombovari Z, Stepan G (2012) The effect of helix angle variation on milling stability. J Manuf Sci Eng 134:51015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo Q, Jiang Y, Zhao B, Ming P (2016) Chatter modeling and stability lobes predicting for non-uniform helix tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Otto A, Rauh S, Ihlenfeldt S, Radons G (2017) Stability of milling with non-uniform pitch and variable helix tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:2613–2625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niu J, Ding Y, Zhu L, Ding H (2017) Mechanics and multi-regenerative stability of variable pitch and variable helix milling tools considering runout. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 123:129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guo Q, Sun Y, Jiang Y, Yan Y, Ming P (2017) Determination of the stability lobes with multi-delays considering cutter’s helix angle effect for machining process. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231:2059–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ureña L, Ozturk E, Sims N (2018) Stability of variable helix milling: model validation using scaled experiments. Procedia CIRP 77:449–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yusoff AR, Sims ND (2011) Optimisation of variable helix tool geometry for regenerative chatter mitigation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takuya K, Suzuki N, Hino R, Shamoto E (2013) A novel design method of variable helix cutters to attain robust regeneration suppression. Procedia CIRP 8:363–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Comak A, Budak E (2017) Modeling dynamics and stability of variable pitch and helix milling tools for development of a design method to maximize chatter stability. Precis Eng 47:459–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Insperger T, Stépán G (2002) Semi-discretization method for delayed systems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 55:503–518MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Insperger T, Stépán G (2004) Updated semi-discretization method for periodic delay-differential equations with discrete delay. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61:117–141MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kiss AK, Hajdu D, Bachrathy D, Stepan G (2018) Operational stability prediction in milling based on impact tests. Mech Syst Signal Process 103:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kiss AK, Bachrathy D, Stepan G (2017) Experimental determination of dominant multipliers in milling process by means of homogeneous coordinate transformation. In: ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p V008T12A053-V008T12A053Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Altintas Y (2012) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design. Cambridge university pressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of EducationTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations