Study on ultrasonic vibration–assisted cutting of Nomex honeycomb cores

  • Di Kang
  • Ping ZouEmail author
  • Hao Wu
  • Jingwei Duan
  • Wenjie Wang


Traditionally processed Nomex honeycomb cores usually have apparent defects. These defects are inevitably caused by the large cutting force generated as a consequence of limit clamping mode of the honeycomb core. These defects, such as tear, burr, and other machining defects, are normally observed on the processed honeycomb cores. In this paper, a reliable predictive model for the ultrasonic assisted cutting of honeycomb cores is developed and the mechanics behind the machining process is presented. The theoretical model predicts the influence of each processing parameter on the cutting force, and the model is verified through single-factor experiment which reveals that the cutting force is influenced by four experimental factors. Comparison between the images of the workpiece surfaces obtained in the ultrasonic assisted cutting and traditional cutting experiments indicates that the ultrasonic assisted cutting is superior to the traditional cutting of Nomex honeycomb cores. The influence of the four factors on the cutting force test index in descending order as obtained from the orthogonal experiment is amplitude, oblique angle, depth of cut, and feed rate. Finally, the optimum processing parameters are determined as amplitude 25 μm and oblique angle of 30°.


Nomex honeycomb cores Ultrasonic vibration–assisted cutting Theoretical model Orthogonal experiment Optimum processing parameters 


Funding information

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51875097) and the Shenyang Science and Technology Plan Projects (F16-205-1-05).


  1. 1.
    Kececi E, Asmatulu R (2017) Effects of moisture ingressions on mechanical properties of honeycomb-structured fiber composites for aerospace applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(1–4):459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li Y (1995) The development and application of the Nomex honeycomb in Russia aerospace area. J Mater Eng 4:3–5Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luo YQ, Hao W (2009) Study on properties of T722 Nomex honeycomb. Hi-Tech Fiber Appl 34(1):34–37Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gong Z, Liang G (2003) Development of the NOMEX honeycomb for high-performance airborne radome. Eng Plast Appl 31(6):36–38Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alp K, Jouni F (2012) Experimental studies on mechanical properties of cellular structures using Nomex® honeycomb cores. Compos Struct 94(6):2017–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hou XL, Zhu YJ (2009) NC machining of honeycomb structure. Aeronaut Manuf Technol (S1):60–63Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jaafar M, Atlati S, Makich H, Nouari M, Moufki A, Julliere B (2017) A 3D FE modeling of machining process of Nomex® honeycomb core: influence of the cell structure behaviour and specific tool geometry. Procedia CIRP 58:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang FB, Liu JK, Shu QL (2017) Optimization of cryogenic milling parameters for AFRP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9–12):3243–3252Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang FB, Wang YQ, Hou B, Zhang JB, Li YP (2016) Effect of cryogenic conditions on the milling performance of aramid fiber. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1–4):429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu WX, Zhang LC (2015) Ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining: principle, design and application. Adv Manuf 3(3):173–192MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sanda A, Arriola I, Navas VG, Bengoetxea I, Gonzalo O (2016) Ultrasonically assisted drilling of carbon fibre reinforced plastics and Ti6Al4V. J Manuf Process 22:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    He Y, Zou P, Zhu WL, Ehmann KF (2017) Ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting of hard materials: simulation and experimental study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(1–4):363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang X, Dong ZG, Wang YD, Xu ZD, Song HX, Kang RK (2017) Charization of surface microscopic of Nomex honeycomb after ultrasonic assisted cutting. Aust J Mech Eng 53(19):90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu XP, Yu BH, Li XY, Chen NC (2017) Research on cutting force model of triangular blade for ultrasonic assisted cutting honeycomb composites. Procedia CIRP 66:159–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seemann R, Krause D (2017) Numerical modelling of Nomex honeycomb sandwich cores at meso-scale level. Compos Struct 159(1):702–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roy R, Park SJ, Kweon JH, Choi JH (2014) Characterization of Nomex honeycomb core constituent material mechanical properties. Compos Struct 117(1):255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu LQ, Wang H, Guan ZW (2015) Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical response of Nomex honeycomb core under transverse loading. Compos Struct 121:304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heimbs S, Schmeer S, Middendorf P, Maier M (2007) Strain rate effects in phenolic composites and phenolic-impregnated honeycomb structures. Compos Sci Technol 67(13):2827–2837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klasson BL (1995) Carbon fibre and fibre lamination in prosthetics and orthotics: some basic theory and practical advice for the practitioner. Prosthetics Orthot Int 19:74–91Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foo CC, Chai GB, Seah LK (2007) Mechanical properties of Nomex material and Nomex honeycomb structure. Compos Struct 80(4):588–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Astashev VK, Babitsky VI, Nagy PB (2007) Ultrasonic processes and machines-dynamics, control and applications. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Di Kang
    • 1
  • Ping Zou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hao Wu
    • 1
  • Jingwei Duan
    • 1
  • Wenjie Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical Engineering and AutomationNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations