Advertisement

Procedure development for predicting the sink mark of injection molded thermoplastics by finite element method

  • Xianjun SunEmail author
  • Patricia Tibbenham
  • Danielle Zeng
  • Xuming Su
  • Shiyao Huang
  • Hong-tae Kang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The sink mark is one common defect of the injection-molded thermoplastics, which is harmful to the part appearance. A procedure for the sink mark prediction was proposed to build the finite element method (FEM) model in Abaqus. The temperature and pressure distributions were imported as boundary conditions at a different time from the injection molding simulation software Moldflow. The user subroutines UEXPAN and UMAT were coded and implemented in Abaqus to describe the pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) behaviors under actual cooling conditions and the polymer constitutive relationship. The PVT curves of the thermoplastic were obtained by the piston-die method at a cooling rate of 5 °C/min. The crystallizing behaviors were measured by a differential scanning calorimetry and adapted to modify the PVT curves at different cooling rates. The tension-compression tests at different temperatures were performed to obtain the stress-strain curves. The simulation of injection molding was conducted in the software Moldflow. The deflection tests were conducted on the coordinate measuring machine (CMM) to validate the predicted sink mark. It was found that the subroutines of UEXPAN described the volume variations under different cooling rates successfully. Furthermore, the subroutine UMAT predicted stress-strain curves successfully at different temperatures and strain rates. The predicted sink mark in Abaqus agreed well with the measured one. The sink mark depth from Abaqus reached one third of the experimental one and had obvious improvement than that from Moldflow.

Keywords

Sink mark Injection molding Simulation PVT Constitutive relationship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to John Lasecki, Robert Frisch, and Dr. Jianghui Mao for their kind help on the measurement of the deflection and modeling in Abaqus.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang X, Zhao G, Wang G (2013) Research on the reduction of sink mark and warpage of the molded part in rapid heat cycle molding process. Mater Des 47:779–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Macher J, Gruber PD et al (2014) A novel sink mark model for high gloss injection molded parts in rapid heat cycle molding process. Polym Test 39:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patel SA, Mallick PK (1998) Development of a methodology for defect reduction in injection molding using process simulations. J Inj Molding Technol 2(4):176–191Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erzurumlu T, Ozcelik B (2006) Minimization of warpage and sink index in injection molded thermoplastic parts using Taguchi optimization method. Mater Des 27:853–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shen C, Wang L, Cao W, Qian L (2007) Investigation of the effect of molding variables on sink marks of plastic injection molded parts using Taguchi DOE technique. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 46:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mathivanan D, Parthasarathy NS (2009) Prediction of sink depths using nonlinear modeling of injection molding variables. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:654–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mathivanan D, Parthasarathy NS (2009) Sink-mark minimization in injection molding through response surface regression modeling and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:867–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mathivanan D, Nouby M, Vidhya R (2010) Minimization of sink mark defects in injection molding process – Taguchi approach. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shi L, Gupta M (1998) A localized shrinkage analysis for predicting sink marks in injection-molded plastic parts. J Inj Molding Technol 2(4):149–155Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shi L, Gupta M (1999) An approximate prediction of sink mark depth in rib-reinforced plastic parts by empirical equations. J Inj Molding Technol 3(1):1–10Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tursi D, Bistany SP (2000) Process and tooling factors affecting sink marks for amorphous and crystalline resins. J Inj Molding Technol 4(3):114–119Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iyer N, Ramani K (2002) A study of localized shrinkage in injection molding with high thermal conductivity molds. J Inj Molding Technol 6(2):73–90Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun X, Su X, Mao J, Tibbenham P, Tao J (2016) The application of modified PVT data on the warpage prediction of injection molded part. J Polym Res 23:86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-016-0980-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun X, Su X, Mao J, Tibbenham P, Tao J, Bao Z (2016) The application of modified viscoplastic constitutive relationship on the warpage prediction of injection-molded part. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(9):2517–2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mao J, Yang X, Gao Q (2009) Finite element implementation to time-dependent constitutive model of solder in micro-electronic packaging. Eng Mech 4(1):216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Engler-Pinto C, Sehitoglu H, Maier H (2003) Cyclic behavior of A1319-T7B under isothermal and non- isothermal conditions. ASTM Spec Tech Publ 1428:45–64Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaboche JL (1989) Constitutive equations for cyclic plasticity and cyclic viscoplasticity. Int J Plast 5(3):247–302CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xianjun Sun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patricia Tibbenham
    • 2
  • Danielle Zeng
    • 2
  • Xuming Su
    • 2
  • Shiyao Huang
    • 3
  • Hong-tae Kang
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of Michigan-DearbornDearbornUSA
  2. 2.Research and Innovation CenterFord Motor CompanyDearbornUSA
  3. 3.Ford Motor Research and Engineering(Nanjing) Co., LtdNanjing CityChina

Personalised recommendations