Advertisement

Measurement of high flexibility components in composite material: critical issues and possible solutions

  • Wilma PoliniEmail author
  • Andrea Corrado
  • Luca Sorrentino
  • Domenico Speranza
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

High-flexibility components in composite material are of great interest in many fields, from aeronautic and automotive industries to sport and design goods. Their deformation during cure process, known as spring-in and warpage, is acceptable if it is within the indicated tolerance. The research aim of the present work is to present a way to inspect a high flexible part in composite material by means of a coordinate measuring machine with a touch probe. This means to define the fixturing equipment and the measurement strategy. The developed method was applied to an L-shaped part with a very small thickness and the obtained measurements were compared with those due to a laser system. The results show a good agreement between the two measurement techniques. Moreover, the further numerical simulations validate the developed contact measurement method.

Keywords

Coordinate measuring machine Flexible component Composite material Laser 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Corrado A, Polini W, Sorrentino L, Bellini C (2018) Geometrical deviation analysis of CFRP thin laminate assemblies: numerical and experimental results. Compos Sci Technol 168:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ding A, Li S, Sun J, Wang J, Zu L (2016) A thermo-viscoelastic model of process-induced residual stresses in composite structures with considering thermal dependence. Compos Struct 136:34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ding A, Li S, Wang J, Ni A, Sun L, Chang L (2016) Prediction of process-induced distortions in L-shaped composite profiles using path-dependent constitutive law. Appl Compos Mater 23(5):1027–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-016-9501-8.
  4. 4.
    Albert C, Fernlund G (2002) Spring-in and warpage of angled composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 62:1895–1912.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00105-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C B, L S, W P, A C (2017) Spring-in analysis of CFRP thin laminates: numerical end experimental results. Compos Struct 173:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fleischer J, Teti R, Lanza G, Mativenga P, Möhring HC, Caggiano A (2018) Composite materials parts manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 67(2):603–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2009) Dimensioning and tolerancing: ASME Y14.5M, ASME National Standard, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fernlund G, Nelson K, Poursartip A Modeling of process induced deformations of composite shell structures. 45th Int. SAMPE Symp., 2000, 169–176.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Darrow DA, Smith LV (2002) Isolating components of processing induced warpage in laminated composites. J Compos Mater 36:2407–2419.  https://doi.org/10.1106/002199802026784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu X, Chang J, Yang Y, Wang Y, Bao Y, Gao H (2018) Evaluation of assembly gap from 3D laser measurements via FEA simulation. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 4303105:1–7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li Y, Gu P (2004) Freeform surface inspection techniques state of the art review. Comput Aided Des 36:1395–1417MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Savio E, De Chiffre L, Schmitt R (2007) Metrology of freeform shaped parts. CIRP Annals, Keynote Paper STC 2007. Ann CIRP – Mfg Technol 56:810–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weckenmann A, Knauer M, Killmaier T (2001) Uncertainty of coordinate measurements on sheet metal parts in the automotive industry. J Mater Process Technol 115:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Svanberg JM, Holmberg JA (2001) An experimental investigation on mechanisms for manufacturing induced shape distortions in homogeneous and balanced laminates. Compos - Part A Appl Sci Manuf 32:827–838.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00173-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dong C, Zhang C, Liang Z, Wang B (2004) Dimension variation prediction for composites with finite element analysis and regression modeling. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 35:735–746.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ascione R, Polini W (2012) Structural analysis for flexible components with freeform surfaces with the aid of a coordinate measuring machine. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226(3):399–411.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405410395852 ISSN 0954-4054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ascione R, Polini W (2010) Measurement of nonrigid freeform surfaces by coordinate measuring machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(10):1055–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2684-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kappel K, Stefaniak D, Hühne C (2013) Process distortions in prepreg manufacturing—an experimental study on CFRP L-profiles. Compos Struct 106:615–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilma Polini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrea Corrado
    • 1
  • Luca Sorrentino
    • 1
  • Domenico Speranza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Cassino and Southern LazioCassinoItaly

Personalised recommendations