Advertisement

A fiducial-aided data fusion method for the measurement of multiscale complex surfaces

  • Shixiang Wang
  • Chi Fai CheungEmail author
  • Mingyu Liu
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Multiscale complex surfaces, possessing high form accuracy and geometric complexity, are widely used for various applications in fields such as telecommunications and biomedicines. Despite the development of multi-sensor technology, the stringent requirements of form accuracy and surface finish still present many challenges in their measurement and characterization. This paper presents a fiducial-aided data fusion method (FADFM), which attempts to address the challenge in modeling and fusion of the datasets from multiscale complex surfaces. The FADFM firstly makes use of fiducials, such as standard spheres, as reference data to form a fiducial-aided computer-aided design (FA-CAD) of the multiscale complex surface so that the established intrinsic surface feature can be used to carry out the surface registration. A scatter searching algorithm is employed to solve the nonlinear optimization problem, which attempts to find the global minimum of the transformation parameters in the transforming positions of the fiducials. Hence, a fused surface model is developed which takes into account both fitted surface residuals and fitted fiducial residuals based on Gaussian process modeling. The results of the simulation and measurement experiments show that the uncertainty of the proposed method was up to 3.97 × 10−5 μm based on a surface with zero form error. In addition, there is a 72.5% decrease of the measurement uncertainty as compared with each individual sensor value and there is an improvement of more than 36.1% as compared with the Gaussian process-based data fusion technique in terms of root-mean-square (RMS) value. Moreover, the computation time of the fusion process is shortened by about 16.7%. The proposed method achieves final measuring results with better metrological quality than that obtained from each individual dataset, and it possesses the capability of reducing the measurement uncertainty and computational cost.

Keywords

Multiscale complex surface Precision surface measurement Data fusion Fiducial Multi-sensor Ultra-precision machining 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. PolyU 15202814). The authors would also like to express their sincere thanks to the Research Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for their financial support of the project through a PhD studentship (project account code: RUEN).

References

  1. 1.
    Fang F, Zhang X, Weckenmann A, Zhang G, Evans C (2013) Manufacturing and measurement of freeform optics. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 62:823–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee W, To S, Cheung C (2005) Design and advanced manufacturing technology for freeform optics, ed. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weckenmann A, Jiang X, Sommer K-D, Neuschaefer-Rube U, Seewig J, Shaw L, Estler T (2009) Multisensor data fusion in dimensional metrology. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 58:701–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Werth Messtechnik GmbH. WerthVideoCheck UA 400. (2016). Available: http://www.werthmesstechnik.de. Accessed 23 June 2017
  5. 5.
    Sharp GC, Lee SW, Wehe DK (2002) ICP registration using invariant features. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Béarée R, Dieulot J-Y, Rabaté P (2011) An innovative subdivision-ICP registration method for tool-path correction applied to deformed aircraft parts machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang X, Jiang L, Zhang G (2017) Novel method of positioning optical freeform surfaces based on fringe deflectometry. CIRP Ann-Manuf TechnolGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheung C, Kong L, Ren M (2010) Measurement and characterization of ultra-precision freeform surfaces using an intrinsic surface feature-based method. Meas Sci Technol 21:115109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zeybek M, Şanlıoğlu İ (2019) Point cloud filtering on UAV based point cloud. Measurement 133:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krolczyk GM, Maruda RW, Nieslony P, Wieczorowski M (2016) Surface morphology analysis of duplex stainless steel (DSS) in clean production using the power spectral density. Measurement 94:464–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang S, Cheung CF, Ren M, Liu M (2018) Fiducial-aided robust positioning of optical freeform surfaces. Micromachines 9:52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mehrad V, Xue D, Gu P (2014) Robust localization to align measured points on the manufactured surface with design surface for freeform surface inspection. Comput Aided Des 53:90–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galetto M, Mastrogiacomo L, Maisano D, Franceschini F (2015) Cooperative fusion of distributed multi-sensor LVM (Large Volume Metrology) systems. CIRP Ann 64:483–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Forbes AB (2012) Weighting observations from multi-sensor coordinate measuring systems. Meas Sci Technol 23:025004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ren M, Sun L, Liu M, Cheung C, Yin Y, Cao Y (2017) A weighted least square based data fusion method for precision measurement of freeform surfaces. Precis Eng 48:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang J, Pagani L, Leach RK, Zeng W, Colosimo BM, & Zhou L (2017) Study of weighted fusion methods for the measurement of surface geometry. Precis Eng 47:111–121Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colosimo BM, Pacella M, Senin N (2015) Multisensor data fusion via Gaussian process models for dimensional and geometric verification. Precis Eng 40:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu M, Cheung CF, Cheng C-H, Lee WB (2016) A gaussian process data modelling and maximum likelihood data fusion method for multi-sensor CMM measurement of freeform surfaces. Appl Sci 6:409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ren MJ, Sun LJ, Liu MY, Cheung CF, Yin YH (2017) A reconstruction–registration integrated data fusion method for measurement of multiscaled complex surfaces. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 66:414–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sundaram RK (1996) A first course in optimization theory. Cambridge university press, CambridgeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Loke MH, Barker R (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ugray Z, Lasdon L, Plummer J, Glover F, Kelly J, Martí R (2007) Scatter search and local NLP solvers: a multistart framework for global optimization. INFORMS J Comput 19:328–340MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Glover F (1998) A template for scatter search and path relinking. In: Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1363, pp 13–54Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilson AG (2014) Covariance kernels for fast automatic pattern discovery and extrapolation with Gaussian processes. University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rasmussen CE (2010) Available: http://www.gaussianprocess.org/gpml/code/matlab/doc/. Accessed 18 April 2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Partner State Key Laboratory of Ultraprecision Machining Technology, Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations