Robust fixture design of compliant assembly process based on a support vector regression model

  • Kuigang YuEmail author


Fixtures are used to locate and clamp parts and subassemblies during the compliant assembly process of automotive body parts. As a result, the assembly quality of compliant sheet metal parts is mainly determined by fixture locating layouts and variation sources, such as manufacturing variation of parts and fixture locating variation. This paper proposes a robust fixture design method of the compliant assembly process based on a support vector regression model. Firstly, an assembly variation modeling method of compliant sheet metal parts is discussed during the assembly subprocesses of fixture locating, welding gun clamping, weld finishing, and welding gun releasing. The combined assembly variation model describes a numeric relationship between the assembly variation of key measurement points and all variation sources under a certain fixture locating layout. Further, to solve the difficulty of directly obtaining the parameter model between the assembly variation and fixture design layouts under a certain variation source level, a response surface modeling method based on a support vector regression model is presented. And a whole assembly robust objective function is presented to realize the combining consideration of the whole assembly quality control with different assembly quality controls of different areas. Finally, a taillight bracket assembly is used to demonstrate the robust fixture design method. Results show that the proposed method is feasible and the assembly quality under the robust fixture locating layout has been greatly increased.


Fixture design Robust design Assembly variation modeling Response surface model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The work was supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. ZR2016EEM31).


  1. 1.
    Cai W, Hu SJ, Yuan JX (1997) A variational method of robust fixture configuration design for 3-D workpieces. ASME. J Manuf Sci Eng 119(4A):593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang MY, Liu T, Pelinescu DM (2003) Fixture kinematics analysis based on the full contact model of rigid bodies. ASME. J Manuf Sci Eng 125(2):316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu SJ, Webbink R, Lee J, Long Y (2003) Robustness evaluation for compliant assembly systems. ASME J Mech Des 125(2):262–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li B, Shiu BW, Lau KJ (2003) Robust fixture configuration design for sheet metal assembly with laser welding. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 125(1):120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Izquierdo LE, Hu SJ, Du H, Jin R, Jee H, Shi J (2009) Robust fixture layout design for a product family assembled in a multistage reconfigurable line. ASME. J Manuf Sci Eng 131(4):0410081–0410089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li B, Yu H, Yang X, Hu Y (2010) Variation analysis and robust fixture design of a flexible fixturing system for sheet metal assembly. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 132(4):0410141–04101413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fan L, Senthil Kumar A (2010) Development of robust fixture locating layout for machining workpieces. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 224(12):1792–1803Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moronia G, Petròa S, Polinib W (2014) Robust design of fixture configuration. Procedia CIRP 21:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lu C, Zhao H (2015) Fixture layout optimization for deformable sheet metal workpiece. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 78(1–4):85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Masoumi A, Shahi VJ (2018) Fixture layout optimization in multi-station sheet metal assembly considering assembly sequence and datum scheme. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 95(9–12):4629–4643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu SC, Hu SJ (1997) Variation simulation for deformable sheet metal assemblies using finite element methods. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 119(3):368–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camelio JA (2002) Modeling and diagnosis of dimensional variation for assembly systems with compliant parts. University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liao X, Wang GG (2005) Wavelets-based method for variation analysis of non-rigid assemblies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1551–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu KG, Yang ZH (2015) Assembly variation modeling method research of compliant automobile body sheet metal parts using the finite element method. Int J Auto Tech 16(1):51–56MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vapnik V, Golowich S, Smola A (1997) Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation, and signal processing. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst 9:281–287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of High-efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacturing, Ministry of EducationShandong UniversityJinanChina
  3. 3.National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering EducationShandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations