The goal of this research is to develop a costing framework and explore opportunities for fabricating components using additive manufacturing (AM) and machining approaches. The examples target plastic machining, and the fused deposition modeling AM process, but the general model structure is applicable for other AM processes as process knowledge is developed. The question “when is machining more cost-effective than AM” has not been comprehensively addressed. The purpose of this work is to develop a costing framework to provide insight on whether to use machining or AM. An estimation model which considers the process planning, setup, and fabrication time-cost elements is developed in a structured manner. This is challenging due to the machining process planning complexity, the decision-making, and the skill set required, especially for complex surface finish machining. This framework can be readily adapted to suit specific environments. The estimation time models are linked to a cost model, and comparisons are drawn, based on the form complexity and manufacturing quantity. An effective combination of AM and machining technologies could bring about a new hybrid manufacturing approach that meets the requirements of the next generation of production systems, especially for short-run production. A cost-benefit analysis is performed to illustrate solution approaches for designing additive, subtractive, or hybrid operation sets for a variety of components to highlight the merits of the presented approach. Exploring a larger solution space of processing options and their processing time and costs will allow designers to generate more cost-competitive solutions.
Fused deposition modeling Machining Costing model framework Hybrid process planning
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Urbanic R, DiCecco L (2015) Development of adaptable light weighting methods for material extrusion processes. ASME. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing ():V02AT02A003. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2015-51174
Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Cano S, Schuschnigg S, Kukla C, Sapkota J, Holzer C (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic and ceramic components by the material extrusion of highly-filled polymers: a review and future perspectives. Materials 11:840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saqib S, Urbanic RJ (2011) An experimental study to determine geometric and dimensional accuracy impact factors for fused deposition modelled parts. 4th International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production. 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_48
Rayegani F, Onwubolu G (2014) Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(1):509–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steuben J, Iliopoulos A, Michopoulos J (2016) Implicit slicing for functionally tailored additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 77:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh H, Rayegani F, Onwubolu G. Cost optimization of FDM additive manufactured parts. ASME. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing ():V02AT02A005. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2014-36697
Eiliat H (2018) Development of optimal material extrusion additive manufacturing tool path parameters for minimizing void regions using contemporary tool path solutions, PhD Thesis, University of WindsorGoogle Scholar
Bentzen N, Laussen E (2018) Using recycled and bio-based plastics for additive manufacturing a case study on a low volume car component. Master’s thesis in product development, MASc. Thesis, Department of Industrial and Materials Science CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY GothenburgGoogle Scholar