Advertisement

Improving surface integrity and surface roughness by forming multi-discharging channels from one pulse in EDM

  • Xin Mu
  • Ming ZhouEmail author
  • Qing Ye
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Conventional electrical discharge machining (EDM) usually took a large gap distance to obtain the integrity of machined surface. However, large gap distances really prevented further improving surface quality and lowered machining efficiency as well. Conversely, this paper took small gap distances in discharging so that discharging from multi-discharging channels could be synchronously realized. To this end, a new adaptive control system for EDM was studied in this paper where arcing ratio was chosen to be a control index and gap servo voltage was a control variable. Arcing ratio was forced to follow a predetermined arcing ratio expectation by adapting gap servo voltage so that arcing pulses could not take place in machining and thus the integrity of the machined surface can be obtained. Compared with conventional EDM, in addition to the more integrated machined surface had been obtained, the surface roughness had been lowered almost 3.5 times and the machining rate improved 2.5 times. Additionally, different forms of multi-discharging channels from one pulse were able to be realized by setting different arcing ratio expectations meeting different requirements of surface roughness. The significance of the study is that forming multi-discharging channels from one pulse displayed an innovative approach in precision EDM.

Keywords

Precision manufacturing Multiple channel discharging Surface roughness (SR) Adapting gap servo voltage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

This research project has been financially supported by “The Fundamental Research Funds for Beijing Universities (No.X18082)” and “The Graduate Innovation Project of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (No.PG2018083).”

References

  1. 1.
    Yongfeng LIU, Pucheng PEI (2006) Asymptotic analysis on autoignition and explosion limits of hydrogen-oxygen mixtures in homogeneous systems. Int J Hydrog Energy 31(5):639–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luo YF (1997) The dependence of interspace discharge transitivity upon the gap debris in precision electrodischarge machining. J Mater Process Technol 68(68):121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Izquierdo B, Sánchez JA, Plaza S, Pombo I, Ortega N (2009) A numerical model of the EDM process considering the effect of multiple discharges. Int J Mach Tool Manu 49(3–4):220–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Torres A, Luis CJ, Puertas I (2017) EDM machinability and surface roughness analysis of TiB2 using copper electrodes. J Alloys Compd 690:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Torres A, Puertas I, Luis CJ (2015) Modelling of surface finish, electrode wear and material removal rate in electrical discharge machining of hard-to-machine alloys. Precis Eng 40:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Torres A, Puertas I, Luis CJ (2017) Spacing roughness parameters analysis on the EDM of Inconel ® 600 alloy. Proc Manuf 13:573–578Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oßwald K, Schneider S, Hensgen L, Klink A, Klocke F (2017) Experimental investigation of energy distribution in continuous sinking EDM. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 19:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patel KM, Pandey PM, Venkateswara Rao P (2009) Determination of an optimum parametric combination using a surface roughness prediction model for EDM of Al2O3/SiCw/TiC ceramic composite. Int J Adv Manuf Process 24(6):675–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pradhan M K, Biswas C K (2009) Modeling and analysis of process parameters on surface roughness in EDM of AISI D2 tool steel by RSM approach. Nova Science Publishers USA, 3:66–71Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Das MK, Kumar K, Barman TK, Sahoo P (2014) Application of artificial bee colony algorithm for optimization of MRR and surface roughness in EDM of EN31 tool steel. Procedia Mater Sci 6:741–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khan MR, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K (2015) An experimental investigation on surface finish in die-sinking EDM of Ti-5Al-2.5Sn. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(9–12):1727–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tomadi SH, Hassan MA, Hamedon Z, Daud R, Khalid AG (2009) Analysis of the influence of EDM parameters on surface quality, material removal rate and electrode wear of tungsten carbide. Lecture Notes Eng Comput Sci 2175(1)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang J, Qian J, Ferraris E, Reynaerts D (2016) In-situ monitoring and adaptive control of precision micro-EDM cavity milling. Precis Eng 47:261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan MAR, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K, Maleque MA, Bakar RA (2011) Artificial intelligence model to predict surface roughness of Ti-15-3 alloy in EDM process. World Academy of Science. Eng Technol 74:121–125Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Majumder H, Maity K (2018) Prediction and optimization of surface roughness and micro-hardness using grnn and MOORA-fuzzy-a MCDM approach for nitinol in WEDM. Measurement 118:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rao PS, Ramji K, Satyanarayana B (2014) Experimental investigation and optimization of wire EDM parameters for surface roughness, MRR and white layer in machining of aluminium alloy. Procedia Mater Sci 5:2197–2206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shen Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Dong H, Sun W, Wang X, Zheng C, Ji R (2015) High-speed dry electrical discharge machining. Int J Mach Tool Manu 93:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang S, Chen J, Yang Y, Zhang K, Li Y, Zhu B (2018) Study on the characteristics of plasma channel based on multi-spark pulse discharge machining effect. Int J Adv Manuf TechnolGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fonseca J, Marafona JD (2013) The importance of servo reference voltage on multiple discharges. Procedia CIRP 6:416–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fua X, Gao L, Zhang Q, Liu Q (2016) Surface roughness research of piezoelectric self-adaptive micro-EDM. Procedia Cirp 42:563–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singh G, Singh G, Singh K, Singla A (2017) Experimental studies on material removal rate, tool wear rate and surface properties of machined surface by powder mixed electric discharge machining. Mater Today: Proc 4:1065–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tripathy S, Tripathy DK (2017) Surface characterization and multi-response optimization of EDM process parameters using powder mixed dielectric. Mater Today Proc 4(2):2058–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toshimitsu R, Okada A, Kitada R, Okamoto Y (2016) Improvement in surface characteristics by EDM with chromium powder mixed fluid. Procedia Cirp 42:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hua FQ, Cao FY, Song BY, Hou PJ, Zhang Y, Chen K, Wei JQ (2013) Surface properties of SiCp/Al composite by powder-mixed. EDM 6:101–106Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Antar M, Hayward P, Dunleavey J, Butler-Smith P (2018) Surface integrity evaluation of modified EDM surface structure. Procedia Cirp 68:308–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang F, Bellotti M, Hua H, Yang J, Qian J, Reynaerts D (2018) Experimental analysis of normal spark discharge voltage and current with a RC-type generator in micro-EDM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5–8):2963–2972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu H, Chi G, Wang Z, Wang Y, Li H (2018) Graded layer identification and open voltage adjustment for EDM process of Ni-Al2O3 FGMs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99(9–12):2611–2622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhou M, Han F, Wang Y, Soichiro I (2009) Assessment of the dynamical properties in EDM process-detecting deterministic nonlinearity of EDM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou M, Xin M, Liang H, Ye Q (2019) Improving EDM performance by adapting gap servo-voltage. J Manuf Process J Manuf Process 37:101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    L. Ljung (1999) System identification—theory for the user, seconded, Prentice-Hall PTRGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    K.J. Astrom, B. Wittenmark (1995) Adaptive control, seconded, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical-Electronic and Automobile Engineering, Beijing Key Laboratory of Performance Guarantee on Urban Rail Transit VehiclesBeijing University of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations