Effect of pad wear on tool influence function in robotic polishing of large optics

  • Songlin Wan
  • Xiangchao ZhangEmail author
  • Wei Wang
  • Min Xu


Robotic polishing can greatly improve the manufacturing efficiency of precision optics, and its tool influence function (TIF) needs to be modeled precisely for deterministic fabrication. When polishing large optics, the TIFs are significantly affected by the wear of the polishing pad, which in turn will change the material removal rate. In this paper, the generating mechanism of the pad wear is analyzed, so as to quantitatively predict the wear amount of the polishing pad under different processing parameters; consequently, the TIF error caused by pad wear can be compensated. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model can reliably predict the polishing pad shape and the corresponding TIF after different wearing time; henceforth, the resulting form quality and convergence rate of robotic polishing can be significantly improved.


Optics fabrication Robot Polishing Pad wear Tool influence function 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This study received financial support from the Science Challenging Program (JCKY2016212A506-0106), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51875107), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB1104700), and European Horizon 2020 EMPIR project (15SIB01 FreeFORM).


  1. 1.
    Pollicove H, Golini D (2003) Deterministic manufacturing processes for precision optical surfaces. Key Eng Mater 238:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pan R, Zhang Y, Ding J, Huang C, Wang Z (2016) Optimization strategy on conformal polishing of precision optics using bonnet tool. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 17(3):271–280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lin ZC, Wang RY, Jhang ZW (2018) Establishing a theoretical model for abrasive removal depth of silicon wafer chemical mechanical polishing by integrating a polishing times analytical model and specific down force energy theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9–12):4671–4683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang L, Huang D, Zhou W, Fan C, Ji S, Zhao J (2017) Corrective polishing of freeform optical surfaces in an off-axis three-mirror imaging system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):2861–2869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones RA (1977) Optimization of computer controlled polishing. Appl Opt 16(1):218–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wan S, Zhang X, He X, Xu M (2016) Modeling of edge effect in subaperture tool influence functions of computer controlled optical surfacing. Appl Opt 55(36):10223–10228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hill JM (2010) The large binocular telescope. Appl Opt 49(16):D115–D122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cayrel M (2012) E-ELT optomechanics: overview. Proc SPIE 8444:84441XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johns M (2008) The giant Magellan telescope (GMT). Proc SPIE 6986:698603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clampin M (2008) Status of the James WEBB space telescope (JWST). Proc SPIE 7010:70100LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Preston FW (1927) The theory and design of plate glass polishing machines. J Glass Technol 11(44):214–256Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu TK, Yu CC, Orlowski M (1993) A statistical polishing pad model for chemical-mechanical polishing. Proc IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 865–868Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xie Y, Bhushan B (1996) Effects of particle size, polishing pad and contact pressure in free abrasive polishing. Wear 200(1–2):281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang G, Liu X, Lu W (2013) A parameter prediction model of running-in based on surface topography. Proc IMechE Part J: J Eng Tribol 227(9):1047–1055Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu W, Zhang G, Liu X, Jiang X (2014) Prediction of surface topography at the end of sliding running-in wear based on areal surface parameters. Tribol Trans 57(3):553–560. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jin XL, Zhang LC (2012) A statistical model for material removal prediction in polishing. Wear 274:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu D, Chen G, Hu Q (2017) Material removal model of chemical mechanical polishing for fused silica using soft nanoparticles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):3515–3525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lu W, Zhang P, Liu X, Zhai W, Zhou M, Luo J, Zeng W, Jiang X (2017) Influence of surface topography on torsional fretting wear under flat-on-flat contact. Tribol Int 109:367–372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Byrne G, Mullany B, Young P (1999) The effect of pad wear on the chemical mechanical polishing of silicon wafers. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 48(1):143–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGrath J, Davis C (2004) Polishing pad surface characterisation in chemical mechanical planarisation. J Mater Process Technol 153:666–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee C, Lee H, Jeong M, Jeong H (2011) A study on the correlation between pad property and material removal rate in CMP. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 12(5):917–920. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Park K, Oh J, Jeong H (2008) Pad characterization and experimental analysis of pad wear effect on material removal uniformity in chemical mechanical polishing. Jpn J Appl Phys 47(10R):7812–7817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greenwood JA, Williamson JP (1966) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A 295(1442):300–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hibbeler RC (2016) Statics and mechanics of materials, 5th edn. Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hayes JB (1984) Linear methods of computer controlled optical figuring, Ph.D. Dissertation, Optical Sciences Center, University of Arizona.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Songlin Wan
    • 1
  • Xiangchao Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wei Wang
    • 1
  • Min Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultra-Precision Optical ManufacturingFudan UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations