Advertisement

Analysis of tubes with rectangular section forming process by fluid–solid coupling method

  • Haidi Su
  • Jian LiEmail author
  • Jili Rong
  • Xueshan Gao
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Owing to the advantages of favorable forming stiffness, light weight, and high production efficiency, hydroforming technology has extensive application prospects in the automobile and aerospace fields. This study designs and develops an experimental test system, which continuously injects oil into a quartz tube with favorable transparency, and then captures the flow characteristics of the liquid in the tube in real time using an ultra-high-speed camera. The fluid–solid coupling method of the MSC.Dytran finite element software is used for the experiment. The correctness of the simulation analysis method is verified by comparing the experimental and simulation results. Thus, a hydraulic bulging experiment of 20# steel tube without axial feed and a simulation analysis of the hydraulic bulging process of the rectangular section tube through the fluid–solid coupling method were conducted. A comparison between the experimental and simulation results verified the correctness of the finite element modeling and numerical calculation. In addition, the effects of forming pressure, loading time, and hydraulic loading path on wall thickness change in fillet filling was studied. Results showed that pressure drop exists in the pipe, and the velocity of the fluid changes rapidly with the deformation. The forming pressure clearly influences the forming effect. The maximum thinning rate of the middle section wall thickness initially decreases and then increases given an extended hydraulic loading time. Therefore, the optimal loading time should be determined to achieve the optimal forming effect. The effect of hydraulic loading path on the thickness reduction of wall thickness is not apparent but significantly influences the uniformity of wall thickness distribution.

Keywords

Fluid–solid coupling Hydraulic bulging Wall thickness distribution Flow field characteristics Rectangular section 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

This study is supported by the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016GXNSFAA380211); Guangxi Innovation-driven Development Project (Grant No. GKAA17204062); and Liuzhou Scientific Research and Technology Development Plan (Grant No. 2016C050203).

References

  1. 1.
    Fatemi A, Morovvati MR, Biglari FR (2013) The effect of tube material, microstructure, and heat treatment on process responses of tube hydroforming without axial force. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(1–4):263–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4727-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khalfallah A (2014) Experimental and numerical assessment of mechanical properties of welded tubes for hydroforming. Mater Design 56:782–790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tijsseling AS, Vardy AE (2005) Fluid-structure interaction and transient cavitation tests in a T-piece pipe. J Fluid Struct 20:753–762.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siyuan C, Hailiang H, Linjie W (2016) Influence of installed interlayers on defensive efficiency of a warship’s liquid cabin. J Harbin Engineering University 37(04):527–532.  https://doi.org/10.11990/jheu.201412040
  5. 5.
    Han C, Feng H, Yan LD, Yuan SJ (2015) Thickness improvement in non-homogeneous tube hydroforming of a rectangular component by contact sequence. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:42–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0362-6 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fengjun C (2009) Study on the deformation behavior of a tube in hydroforming with radial crushing. Guilin University of Electronic Technology, GuilinGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Labergere C, Gelin JC (2012) Numerical simulation of sheet hydroforming taking into account analytical pressure and fluid flow. J Mater Process Technol 212(10):2020–2030.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gang L, Junyang P, Shijian Y, Bugang T, Kai L (2015) Analysis on critical conditions of sidewall wrinkling for hydroforming of thin-walled Tee-joint. Int J Mach Tool Manu 97:42–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haitao J, Zhenli M, Di T, Haiquan W, Yongjuan D (2008) In-situ observation of microstructure in TWIP steel during tensile deformation. J Mater Eng 38(1):38–41.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4381.2008.01.010
  10. 10.
    JiSeok L, JaeHo S, SangHwan L (2012) Fluid-structure interaction of a flapping flexible plate in quiescent fluid. Comput Fluids 57:124–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.10.029 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mirzaali M, Seyedkashi SMH, Liaghat GH, Naeini HM, Shojaee GK, Moon YH (2012) Application of simulated annealing method to pressure and force loading optimization in tube hydroforming process. Int J Mech Sci 55:78–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rakesh AS, Bhushan TP, Ketaki NJ (2016) Optimization of tube hydroforming process (without axial feed) by using FEA simulations. Procedia Technol 23:398–405.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.03.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eftekhari-Shahri SE, Ahmadi-Boroughani SY, Khalili K, Kang BS (2015) Ultrasonic tube hydroforming, a new method to improve formability. Procedia Technol 19:90–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zribi T, Khalfallah A, BelHadjSalah H (2013) Experimental characterization and inverse constitutive parameters identification of tubular materials for tube hydroforming process. Mater Des 49:866–877.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang W, Hongyu W, Xiang Z, Xiaomin X (2011) Strength analysis on stamping and welding impeller in centrifugal pump based on fluid-structure interaction theorem. Trans CSAE 27(3):131–136  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2011.03.025
  16. 16.
    Xie WC, Han C, Chu GN, Yuan SJ (2015) Research on hydro-pressing process of closed section tubular parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:1149–1157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7126-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xianghe X, Shuhui L, Weihang Z, Zhongqin L (2009) Analysis of thickness distribution of square-sectional hydroformed parts. J Mater Process Technol 209(1):158–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiaolei C, Xiaosong W, Shijian Y (2014) Deformation analysis of double-sided tube hydroforming in square-section die. J Mater Process Technol 214(7):1341–1351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yumei Z, Junxiang L (2013) Investigation of wrinkle and fracture limits of cylindrical parts in hydromechanical deep drawing process. Hot Working Technol 42(1):87–90Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu ZL, Wang XS, Pang Q, Huang F, Qin XP, Yuan SJ, Hua L (2015) Experimental and numerical study on hydroforming characteristics of friction stir welded aluminum alloy tubes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:959–969.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6613-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangxi Key Laboratory of Automobile Components and Vehicle TechnologyGuangxi University of Science and TechnologyLiuzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Mechatronical EngineeringBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations