An advanced fuzzy approach for modeling the yield improvement of making aircraft parts using 3D printing

  • Toly Chen
  • Yu-Cheng WangEmail author


Forecasting the yield is critical for making aircraft parts using three-dimensional (3D) printing. However, the existing methods for the yield forecasting exhibit a common problem: they employ the logarithmic or log-sigmoid value, rather than the original value, of the yield to simplify the computation. To address this problem, an advanced fuzzy approach was proposed in this study. The focus of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the advanced fuzzy approach for forecasting the yield of a 3D-printed aircraft part. The advanced fuzzy approach derived the direct-solution (DS) versions of the existing fuzzy yield learning models. These DS versions use the original yield value directly, thereby optimizing the forecasting performance. The proposed methodology was applied to the process of making an aircraft part using 3D printing to evaluate its effectiveness. Experimental results revealed significant improvements in the forecasting accuracy of the proposed methodology compared with the aforementioned methods. Furthermore, when the proposed methodology was applied to various fuzzy yield learning models, different improvements were obtained.


Yield Forecasting Direct-solution 3D printing Aircraft 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (1993) Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen T (2013) Forecasting the yield of a semiconductor product with a collaborative intelligence approach. Appl Soft Comput 13:1552–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen T (2017) A heterogeneous fuzzy collaborative intelligence approach for forecasting product yield. Appl Soft Comput 57:210–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen T, Lin Y-C (2008) A fuzzy-neural system incorporating unequally important expert opinions for semiconductor yield forecasting. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst 16(1):35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen T, Lin Y-C (2017) Feasibility evaluation and optimization of a smart manufacturing system based on 3D printing. Int J Intell Syst 32:394–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen T, Wang Y-C (2014) An agent-based fuzzy collaborative intelligence approach for precise and accurate semiconductor yield forecasting. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(1):201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chua CK, Wong CH, Yeong WY (2017) Standards, quality control, and measurement sciences in 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Academic Press, London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donoso S, Marin N, Vila MA (2006) Quadratic programming models for fuzzy regression. Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Modeling in Honor of Enrique CastilloGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dua V (2015) Mixed integer polynomial programming. Comput Chem Eng 72:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eberle L, Sugiyama H, Papadokonstantakis S, Graser A, Schmidt R, Hungerbühler K (2016) Data-driven tiered procedure for enhancing yield in drug product manufacturing. Comput Chem Eng 87:82–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gruber H (1994) Learning and strategic product innovation: theory and evidence for the semiconductor industry. Elsevier Science B. V, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo L, Qiu J (2018) Combination of cloud manufacturing and 3D printing: research progress and prospect. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5–8):1929–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang R, Riddle M, Graziano D, Warren J, Das S, Nimbalkar S, Cresko J, Masanet E (2016) Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: the case of lightweight aircraft components. J Clean Prod 135:1559–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    John YM, Patel R, Mujtaba IM (2017) Modeling and simulation of an industrial riser in fluid catalytic cracking process. Comput Chem Eng 106:730–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joshi SC, Sheikh AA (2015) 3D printing in aerospace and its long-term sustainability. Virtual Phys Prototyping 10(4):175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li N, Li Y, Liu S (2016) Rapid prototyping of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites by 3D printing. J Mater Process Technol 238:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martin JH, Yahata BD, Hundley JM, Mayer JA, Schaedler TA, Pollock TM (2017) 3D printing of high-strength aluminium alloys. Nature 549(7672):365–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moon SK, Tan YE, Hwang J, Yoon YJ (2014) Application of 3D printing technology for designing light-weight unmanned aerial vehicle wing structures. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 1(3):223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murr LE (2016) Frontiers of 3D printing/additive manufacturing: from human organs to aircraft fabrication. J Mater Sci Technol 32(10):987–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nakagawa Y, Mori KI, Maeno T (2017) 3D printing of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(5–8):2811–2817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parra AAM, Asmanoglo C, Agar DW (2018) Modeling and optimization of a moving-bed adsorptive reactor for the reverse water-gas shift reaction. Comput Chem Eng 109:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peters G (1994) Fuzzy linear regression with fuzzy intervals. Fuzzy Sets Syst 63:45–55, 1994MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tanaka H, Watada J (1988) Possibilistic linear systems and their application to the linear regression model. Fuzzy Sets Syst 272:275–289MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tavanai H, Taheri SM, Nasiri M (2005) Modeling of color yield in polyethylene terephthalate dyeing with statistical and fuzzy regression. Iran Polym J 14(11):954Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thomas DJ (2018) Developing nanocomposite 3D printing filaments for enhanced integrated device fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9–12):4191–4198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu HC, Chen TCT (2018) Quality control issues in 3D-printing manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 24(3):607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang Y, Tjia R (2010) Process modeling and optimization of batch fractional distillation to increase throughput and yield in manufacture of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Comput Chem Eng 34(7):1030–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang Y, Chen Y, Wei Y, Li Y (2016) 3D printing of shape memory polymer for functional part fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(9–12):2079–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zimmermann HJ (1991) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementChaoyang University of TechnologyTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations