Advertisement

Effect of the pressure on fracture behaviors of metal sheet punched by laser-induced shock wave

  • Min Li
  • Xingquan ZhangEmail author
  • Shengzhi Li
  • Huiting Wang
  • Bin Chen
  • Jinyu Tong
  • Guangwu Fang
  • Wei Wei
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Two laser-induced shock wave pressures, 4.5 and 6.5 GPa, were applied to punch LC4CS aluminum sheet respectively, and the influence of different pressures on fracture behaviors was investigated. The code ANSYS/LS-DYNA, dynamic finite element software, was employed to investigate the sheet fracture behaviors during the punching process. The experimental results display that the punching quality manufactured by higher peak pressure of shock wave is better than that by lower one. The finite element method visualizes the punching process, including sheet deformation, cracks growth, and plug flying away. The computational analysis results reveal that the time to punch the sheet with higher peak pressure of shock wave is shorter than that with lower one, and the edge of punched hole resulted from the higher peak pressure is smoother than that from the lower one, which are consistent well with the experimental results.

Keywords

Laser Shock wave Pressure Punch Quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

The authors greatly appreciate the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 51675002, 51175002), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui province (Grant no. 1708085ME110), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Grant no. P2017-007), and the Open Foundation of Zhejiang Provincial Top Key Academic Discipline of Mechanical Engineering (Grant no. ZSTUME02A05).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Cheng GJ, Pirzada D, Ming Z (2007) Microstructure and mechanical property characterizations of metal foil after microscale laser dynamic forming. J Appl Phys 101(6):063108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wielage H, Vollertsen F (2009) Investigations of forming behaviour in laser shock forming. Steel Res Int 80(5):323–328Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lambiase F, Llio AD, Paoletti A (2016) Productivity in multi-pass laser forming of thin AISI 304 stainless steel sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(1–4):259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shahabad SI, Naeini HM, Roohi AH, Soltanpour M, Tavakoli A (2017) Height prediction of dome-shaped products in laser forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5–8):2227–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ding HT, Pence C, Ding H, Shen NG (2013) Experimental analysis of sheet metal micro-bending using a nanosecond-pulsed laser. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(1–4):319–327Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng JG, Zhang J, Chu CC, Zhe J (2005) Experimental study and computer simulation of fracture toughness of sheet metal after laser forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(11–12):1222–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li J, Gao H, Cheng GJ (2010) Forming limit and fracture mode of microscale laser dynamic forming. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 132(6):061005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zheng C, Sun S, Song LB, Zhang GF, Luan YG, Ji Z, Zhang JH (2013) Dynamic fracture characteristics of Fe78Si9B13 metallic glass subjected to laser shock loading. Appl Surf Sci 286:121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu HX, Wang HJ, Shen ZB, Huang ZH, Li W, Zheng YY, Wang X (2012) The research on micro-punching by laser-driven flyer. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 54-55:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu HX, Shen ZB, Wang X, Wang HJ (2009) Numerical simulation and experimentation of a novel laser indirect shock forming. J Appl Phys 106(6):063107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou JZ, Zhang XQ, Zhang YK, Gu YY, Yang CJ, Ni MX (2006) Hole-forming method and device based on laser shock wave technology. CN, ZL200610039505.4 AGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pimenov DY, Guzeev VI (2017) Mathematical model of plowing force to account for flank wear using FME modeling for orthogonal cutting scheme. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9–12):3149–3159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu JF, Long Y, Ji Z, Zhong MS, Liu Q (2017) The influence of liner material on the dynamic response of the finite steel target subjected to high velocity impact by explosively formed projectile. Int J Impact Eng 109:264–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yasar M, Demirci HI, Kadi I (2006) Detonation forming of aluminum cylindrical cups experimental and theoretical modelling. Mater Des 27(5):397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quan HT, Champliaud H, Feng ZK, Dao TM (2014) Analysis of the asymmetrical roll bending process through dynamic FE simulation and experimental study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(5–8):1233–1244Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zheng C, Zhang X, Liu Z, Ji Z, Yu X, Song LB (2018) Investigation on initial grain size and laser power density effects in laser shock bulging of copper foil. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1–4):1483–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buchely MF, Maranon A, Silberschmidt VV (2016) Material model for modeling clay at high strain rates. Int J Impact Eng 90:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramajeyathilagam K, Vendhan CP, Rao VB (2001) Experimental and numerical investigations on deformation of cylindrical shell panels to underwater explosion. Shock Vib 8(5):253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Škrlec A, Klemenc J (2016) Estimating the strain-rate-dependent paramaters of the Cowper-Symonds and Johnson-cook material models using taguchi arrays. Stroj Vestn 62(4):220–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao SG, He Z, Yang JL, Cheng W (2007) Experiment investigation of dynamic material property of aluminium alloy. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 33(8):982–985Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fabbro R, Fournier J, Ballard P, Devaux D, Virmont J (1990) Physical study of laser-produced plasma in confined geometry. J Appl Phys 68(2):775–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang XQ, She JP, Li SZ, Duan SW, Zhou Y, Yu XL, Zheng R, Zhang B (2015) Simulation on deforming progress and stress evolution during laser shock forming with finite element method. J Mater Process Technol 220:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenberg Z, Dekel E (2009) Terminal ballistics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Du WW, Wang L, Zhao DH, Zhi MS, Xu X (2015) Study of the dynamic behaviors of Ti-5553 alloy based on Taylor bar impacting test. Acta Armamentarii 36(9):1750–1756Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xiao XK, Zhang W, Wei G, Mu ZC, Guo ZT (2011) Experimental and numerical investigation on the deformation and failure behavior in the Taylor test. Mater Des 32(5):2663–2674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ABAQUS (2010) Theory manual version 6.10, dassault systemGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang XQ, Zhang Y, Zhang YW, Pei SB, Huang ZL, Deng L, Li SZ (2018) Numerical and experimental investigation of laser shock forming aluminum alloy sheet with mold. Int J Mater Form 11(1):101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shehadeh MA, Zbib HM, Rubia TDDL (2005) Modelling the dynamic deformation and patterning in fcc single crystals at high strain rates: dislocation dynamic plasticity analysis. Philos Mag 85(15):1667–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wielage H, Vollertsen F (2011) Classification of laser shock forming within the field of high speed forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 211(5):953–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang XQ, Chen LS, Li SZ, Duan SW, Zhou Y, Huang ZL, Zhang Y (2015) Investigation of the fatigue life of pre- and post-bone specimen subjected to laser shot peening. Mater Des 88:106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Irizalp SG, Saklakoglu N, Yilbas BS (2014) Characterization of microplastic deformation produced in 6061-T6 by using laser shock processing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(1–4):109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li J, Cheng GJ (2010) Multiple-pulse laser dynamic forming of metallic thin films for microscale three dimensional shapes. J Appl Phys 108(1):013107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hu XY, Daehn GS (1996) Effect of velocity on flow localization in tension. Acta Mater 44(3):1021–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Karman TV, Duwez P (1950) The propagation of plastic deformation in solids. J Appl Phys 21(10):987–994MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Xiao XK, Zhang W, Wei G, Mu ZC (2010) Effect of projectile hardness on deformation and fracture behavior in the Taylor impact test. Mater Des 31(10):4913–4920CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min Li
    • 1
  • Xingquan Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shengzhi Li
    • 2
  • Huiting Wang
    • 2
  • Bin Chen
    • 1
  • Jinyu Tong
    • 1
  • Guangwu Fang
    • 1
  • Wei Wei
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringAnhui University of TechnologyMa’anshanChina
  2. 2.School of Metallurgy EngineeringAnhui University of TechnologyMa’anshanChina

Personalised recommendations