Advertisement

An analytical model for cutter-workpiece engagement calculation in ball-end finish milling of doubly curved surfaces

  • Mohammad Ghorbani
  • Mohammad R. MovahhedyEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a new analytical model for calculating the cutter-workpiece engagement (CWE) boundaries in the ball-end finish milling process of curved surfaces. To this end, first, a quadratic mathematical representation considering the principal curvatures of the surface is employed to locally describe the workpiece surface around the instantaneous cutting region. This description, then, is utilized to find the intersection curves of the tool rotary and workpiece surfaces in three ball-end milling modes including slotting, first cutting, and following cutting. Through comparison studies, the model predictions are verified by the corresponding results obtained via solid modeling in computer-aided design (CAD) environment. The agreement between the results indicates that the model can accurately calculate the CWE boundaries in the ball-end milling of all inclined, convex, concave, and saddle surfaces. Good performance of the model is also demonstrated by comparing the computation time of the model with that of the z-map method. Finally, parametric studies are performed to reveal the effects of surface curvatures and cutting depth on the CWE region. The results show that the CWE is more affected by the surface curvatures as the cutting depth decreases, especially at the concave and saddle regions of the workpiece surface. The proposed analytical model is capable of calculating the CWE boundaries in both three-axis and five-axis milling processes, and there is no need to neither use any numerical solutions nor update the in-process workpiece geometry during the simulation of the CWE boundaries.

Keywords

Ball-end finish milling Cutter-workpiece engagement Doubly curved surface Analytical model Principal curvatures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cao Q, Zhao J, Han S, Chen X (2012) Force coefficients identification considering inclination angle for ball-end finish milling. Precis Eng 36:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wojciechowski S (2015) The estimation of cutting forces and specific force coefficients during finishing ball end milling of inclined surfaces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:110–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papaioannou SG, Patrikoussakis MM (2015) Reduced curvature formulae for surfaces, offset surfaces, curves on a surface and surface intersections. Comput Aided Geom Des 37:69–84MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altintas Y, Kersting P, Biermann D, Budak E, Denkena B, Lazoglu I (2014) Virtual process systems for part machining operations. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 63:585–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Imani BM, Elbestawi MA (2001) Geometric simulation of ball-end milling operations. J Manuf Sci Eng 123:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sadeghi MH, Haghighat H, Elbestawi M (2003) A solid modeler based ball-end milling process simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22:775–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merdol SD, Altintas Y (2008) Virtual cutting and optimization of three-axis milling processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:1063–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lazoglu I, Boz Y, Erdim H (2011) Five-axis milling mechanics for complex free form surfaces. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Layegh SE, Yigit IE, Lazoglu I (2015) Analysis of tool orientation for 5-axis ball-end milling of flexible parts. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 64(1):97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang Y, Zhang W, Wan M, Ma Y (2013) A solid trimming method to extract cutter—workpiece engagement maps for multi-axis milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:2801–2813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wei ZC, Wang MJ, Zhu JN, Gu LY (2011) Cutting force prediction in ball end milling of sculptured surface with Z-level contouring tool path. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:428–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wei ZC, Wang MJ, Cai YJ, Wang SF (2013) Prediction of cutting force in ball-end milling of sculptured surface using improved Z-map. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:1167–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lazoglu I (2003) Sculpture surface machining: a generalized model of ball-end milling force system. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boz Y, Erdim H, Lazoglu I (2015) A comparison of solid model and three-orthogonal dexelfield methods for cutter-workpiece engagement calculations in three-and five-axis virtual milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(5–8):811–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang X, Yu T, Wang W (2014) Modeling, simulation, and optimization of five-axis milling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:1611–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tunc LT, Özkirimli Ö, Budak E (2015) Generalized cutting force model in multi-axis milling using a new engagement boundary determination approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:341–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chao S, Altintas Y (2016) Chatter free tool orientations in 5-axis ball-end milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 106:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozturk B, Lazoglu I (2006) Machining of free-form surfaces. Part I: analytical chip load. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:728–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ozturk B, Lazoglu I, Erdim H (2006) Machining of free-form surfaces. Part II: calibration and forces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:736–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ikua BW, Tanaka H, Obata F, Sakamoto S (2001) Prediction of cutting forces and machining error in ball end milling of curved surfaces-I theoretical analysis. Precis Eng 25:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ikua BW, Tanaka H, Obata F, Sakamoto S, Kishi T, Ishii T (2002) Prediction of cutting forces and machining error in ball end milling of curved surfaces-II experimental verification. Precis Eng 26:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lamikiz A, De Lacalle LNL, Sánchez JA, Salgado MA (2004) Cutting force estimation in sculptured surface milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1511–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kiswanto G, Hendriko H, Duc E (2014) An analytical method for obtaining cutter workpiece engagement during a semi-finish in five-axis milling. Comput Aided Des 55:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Budak E, Ozturk E, Tunc LT (2009) Modeling and simulation of 5-axis milling processes. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 58:347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ozturk E, Tunc LT, Budak E (2009) Investigation of lead and tilt angle effects in 5-axis ball-end milling processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:1053–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huang T, Zhang X, Ding H (2013) Decoupled chip thickness calculation model for cutting force prediction in five-axis ball-end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:1203–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang X, Zhang J, Zheng X, Pang B, Zhao W (2017) Tool orientation optimization of 5-axis ball-end milling based on an accurate cutter/workpiece engagement model. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 19:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tunc LT, Budak E (2009) Extraction of 5-axis milling conditions from CAM data for process simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:538–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tunc LT (2016) Rapid extraction of machined surface data through inverse geometrical solution of tool path information. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1–4):353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zeroudi N, Fontaine M, Necib K (2012) Prediction of cutting forces in 3-axes milling of sculptured surfaces directly from CAM tool path. J Intell Manuf 23:1573–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cao Q, Xue D, Zhao J, Li Y (2011) A cutting force model considering influence of radius of curvature for sculptured surface machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:821–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kiswanto G, Hendriko H, Duc E (2015) A hybrid analytical-and discrete-based methodology for determining cutter-workpiece engagement in five-axis milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(9–12):2083–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ju G, Song Q, Liu Z, Shi J, Wan Y (2015) A solid-analytical-based method for extracting cutter-workpiece engagement in sculptured surface milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5–8):1297–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Li Z-L, Wang X-Z, Zhu L-M (2016) Arc–surface intersection method to calculate cutter–workpiece engagements for generic cutter in five-axis milling. Comput Aided Des 73:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ma J-w, Z-y J, F-j W, Y-y G, Liu Z (2015) A new cutting force modeling method in high-speed milling of curved surface with difficult-to-machine material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(9–12):2195–2205Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li L, Chen B, Liu F, Li C (2014) Complexity analysis and calculation for sculptured surface in multi-axis CNC machining based on surface subdivision. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:1433–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    O'neill B (2006) Elementary differential geometry. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Choi BK, Jerard RB (2012) Sculptured surface machining: theory and applications. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Todd P, McLeod R (1986) Numerical estimation of the curvature of surfaces. Comput Aided Des 18(1):33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li Z-L, Niu J-B, Wang X-Z, Zhu L-M (2015) Mechanistic modeling of five-axis machining with a general end mill considering cutter runout. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 96:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shmakov SL (2011) A universal method of solving quartic equations. Int J Pure Appl Math 71(2):251–259MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vickers G, Quan K (1989) Ball-mills versus end-mills for curved surface machining. J Eng Ind 111(1):22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Precision Manufacturing Laboratory (PML), Department of Mechanical EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations