Experimental investigation and thermo-mechanical modelling for tool life evaluation of photopolymer additively manufactured mould inserts in different injection moulding conditions

  • Ali DavoudinejadEmail author
  • Mohamad Bayat
  • David Bue Pedersen
  • Yang Zhang
  • Jesper Henri Hattel
  • Guido Tosello


There is a growing interest for integrating additive manufacturing (AM) technology in different manufacturing processes such as injection moulding (IM) due to the possibility of achieving shorter manufacturing times and increased cost effectiveness. This paper evaluates IM inserts fabricated by the AM vat photopolymerisation method. The inserts are directly manufactured with a photopolymer material, integrated on an injection moulding tool and subsequently used for IM. Therefore, particular attention has to be paid in order to develop the soft tooling process chain and the IM experimental procedure as detailed in this study. Different combinations of IM parameters are investigated in this work in order to determine the influence of the various process settings on the inserts’ performance (lifetime, crack propagation, consistency of the mould surface features). The mould inserts were analysed by three-dimensional optical metrology and evaluated with regard to the different surface features that were affected by the IM process. A three-dimensional thermo-mechanical with phase change model for the analysis of the effects of the IM process on the additive manufactured tools was accomplished in the FE software COMSOL Multiphysics. The potential causes for the insert failure are identified both by means of the IM experiments and the numerical model. The developed model could also predict the thermally induced deformations produced in the mould and identify where this phenomenon would eventually lead to defects in the shape of the parts. The influence of three different temperatures of the insert at 25 °C, 50 °C and 100 °C on the failure of the insert was investigated. Also a detailed discussion about the solidification and temperature changes is given.


Additive manufacturing Vat photopolymerization Injection moulding Finite element modelling Soft tooling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The research leading to these results has received funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under REA grant agreement no. 609405 (COFUNDPostdocDTU).


  1. 1.
    Mellor S, Hao L, Zhang D (2014) Additive manufacturing: a framework for implementation. Int J Prod Econ 149:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davoudinejad A, Ribo MM, Pedersen DB, Islam A, and Tosello G Direct fabrication of bio-inspired gecko-like geometries with vat polymerization additive manufacturing method. J Micromech Microeng 28(8).
  3. 3.
    Davoudinejad A, Diaz-Perez LC, Quagliotti D, Pedersen DB, Albajez-García JA, Yagüe-Fabra JA, Tosello G (2018) Additive manufacturing with vat polymerization method for precision polymer micro components production. Procedia CIRP 75:98–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ovsianikov A, Malinauskas M, Schlie S, Chichkov B, Gittard S, Narayan R, Löbler M, Sternberg K, Schmitz KP, Haverich A (2011) Three-dimensional laser micro-and nano-structuring of acrylated poly (ethylene glycol) materials and evaluation of their cytoxicity for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 7(3):967–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Credi C, Levi M, Turri S, Simeone G (2017) Stereolithography of perfluoropolyethers for the microfabrication of robust omniphobic surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 404:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lantada AD, Piotter V, Plewa K, Barié N, Guttmann M, Wissmann M (2014) Toward mass production of microtextured microdevices: linking rapid prototyping with microinjection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5–8):1011–1020Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang Y, Pedersen DB, Gøtje AS, Mischkot M, Tosello G (2017) A soft tooling process chain employing additive manufacturing for injection molding of a 3D component with micro pillars. J Manuf Process 27:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mischkot M, Davoudinejad A, Charalambis A, Tosello G, Pedersen DB, Nørgaard H (2017) Dimensional accuracy of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene injection molded parts produced in a pilot production with an additively manufactured insert. In 33rd Conference of the Polymer Processing Society, at Cancun, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kovacs JG, Kortelyesi G, Kovacs NK, Suplicz A (2011) Evaluation of measured and calculated thermal parameters of a photopolymer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 38(7):863–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cao W, Kong L, Li Q, Ying J, Shen C (2011) Model and simulation for melt flow in micro-injection molding based on the PTT model. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 19(8):85003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffiths CA, Dimov SS, Brousseau EB, Packianather MS (2008) The finite element analysis of melt flow behaviour in micro-injection moulding. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 222(9):1107–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guerrier P, Tosello G, Nielsen KK, Hattel JH (2016) Three-dimensional numerical modeling of an induction heated injection molding tool with flow visualization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(1):643–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    La M, Lee JG, Park SJ (2018) Numerical and experimental investigation of plastic injection molding of micro‐engineered surfaces. 58(S1) Special Issue: Thermoplastic Engineering.
  14. 14.
    Metwally K, Barriere T, Khan-Malek C (2016) Replication of micrometric and sub-micrometric structured surfaces using micro-injection and micro-injection compression moulding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(5):779–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi S-J, Kim SK (2011) Multi-scale filling simulation of micro-injection molding process. J Mech Sci Technol 25(1):117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rytka C, Lungershausen J, Kristiansen PM, Neyer A (2016) 3D filling simulation of micro-and nanostructures in comparison to iso-and variothermal injection moulding trials. J Micromech Microeng 26(6):65018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Technical datasheet, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)-Terluran® GP-35Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Griffiths CA, Dimov SS, Brousseau EB, Hoyle RT (2007) The effects of tool surface quality in micro-injection moulding. J Mater Process Technol 189(1–3):418–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guerrier P, Tosello G, Hattel JH (2017) Flow visualization and simulation of the filling process during injection molding. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 16:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ozcelik B, Ozbay A, Demirbas E (2010) Influence of injection parameters and mold materials on mechanical properties of ABS in plastic injection molding. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 37(9):1359–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bergman TL, Incropera FP, DeWitt DP, Lavine AS (2011) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hafid M, Lacroix M (2017) Inverse heat transfer prediction of the state of the brick wall of a melting furnace. Appl Therm Eng 110:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hattel JH, Pryds N, Thorborg J, Lipinski M, Schneider M, Hattel, JH (ed.) (2005) Fundamentals of Numerical Modelling of Casting Processes. Polyteknisk Forlag, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holman JP (2002) Heat transfer, 9th edn. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Osswald Tim, Hernández-Ortiz JP (2006) Polymer processing. Modeling and Simulation.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boresi AP, Schmidt RJ, Sidebottom OM (1993) Advanced mechanics of materials, vol 6. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sadd MH (2009) Elasticity: theory, applications, and numerics. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Budynas RG, Nisbett JK et al (2008) Shigley’s mechanical engineering design, vol 8. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTechnical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations