Advertisement

Experimental correlation between the production parameter and mechanical properties of functional epoxy-cow bone particulate composites

  • A. D. Omah
  • V. S. AigbodionEmail author
  • S. C. Madu
  • E. O. Oji
  • U. U. Uyor
  • S. Ude
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

A polymer matrix (epoxy) composite was produced using cow bone particles as reinforcement, and different mechanical tests were performed to evaluate the composite workability. The cow bone (CB) was washed, air dried, and carbonized at a temperature of 750 °C after which they were milled into powder and screened to particle sizes of 150 μm, 300 μm, and 600 μm. The milled cow bone particles were varied from 10 to 60 wt%, and composite materials were produced from them. The mechanical properties of the composites examined include tensile strength, impact strength, and hardness. The effect of carbonization on the mechanical properties of the developed composites was studied in this research. The results show that smaller particles have the best properties. Optimum results were also obtained as the filler loading increased to a value of 40 wt% before decreasing. Better enhancement of property was obtained for the carbonized composites for tensile strength and hardness values, but uncarbonized composites gave better impact strength. The various results obtained are equivalent to those of other agro-waste materials generally used in polymer composite production. Thus, this work shows that cow bone particles can be a useful material for polymer composites production for various mechanical applications.

Keywords

Cow bone Mechanical properties Epoxy and microstructure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Omah AD, Okorie BA, Omah EC, Ezema IC, Aigbodion VS, Orji UU (2017) Experimental correlation between varying cassava cortex and dielectric properties in epoxy/cassava cortex dielectric particulates composites. Part Sci TechnolGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hassan SB*, Agunsoye JO, Aigbodion VS (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of carbonized rice husk nanoparticles reinforced Al-Cu-Mg alloy composite. Contributed Papers from Materials Science and Technology 2016 (MS&T16) October 23–27, Salt Palace Convention Center, Salt Lake City, Utah USA. pp 883–889Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prakash T (2009) Processing and characterization of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Bachelor’s Thesis, National Institute of Technology, RourkelaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asuke F, Aigbodion VS, Abdulwahab M, Fayomi OSI, Popoola API, Nwoyi CI, Garba B (2012) Effects of bone particle on the properties and microstructure of polypropylene/bone ash particulate composites. Res in Phy 2:135–141Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    IUPAC (1995) 67, 473 (Recommended terminology for the description of carbon as a solid substitution. 9. (IUPAC Recommendations 1995)) on pp 484Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iloabachie ICC, Obiorah SMO, Ezema IC, Henry VI, Chime OH (2017) Effects of carbonization on the physical and mechanical properties of coconut shell particle reinforced polyester composite. Inter Jour of Res in Adv Eng and Tech 3(1):62–69Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kroschwitz IJ (1987) Technology and engineering composite. Engineering handbook, Issue 147024567, Wiley, pp 1039Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xanthos M (2005) Functional filler for plastics. Wiley – VCH, Weinhem, p 432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Omah AD, Okorie BA, Omah EC, Ezema C, Aigbodion VS, Offor PO (2017) Measurement of dielectric properties of polymer matrix composites developed from cow bone powder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(1–4):325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodger JA (2018) Advances in multi-sensor information fusion: a Markov Kalman viscosity fuzzy statistical predictor for analysis of oxygen flow, diffusion, speed, temperature, and time metrics in cpap, expert systems, forthcoming.  https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12270
  11. 11.
    Clyne TW (ed) (2001) Comprehensive metal matrix composites, (Ser.eds), pp 4101–105Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou Y, Pervin F, Biswas MA, Rangari VK, Jeelani S (2006) Fabrication and characterization of montmorillonite clay-filled SC – 15 epoxy. Mater Lett 60:869–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aigbodion VS (2007)Development of Al – Si – Fe/SiC particulate composite as advanced materials for engineering applications. MSc. Thesis, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, pp 1–56Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ansary Yar A, Montazerian M, Abdizadeh H, Baharvandi HR Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum alloy matrix composite reinforced with nanoparticle MgO. J Alloys Compd 484:400–404Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chawla KK (1998) Composite materials science and engineering. Springer Verlag Inc, New York, pp 345–347Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Askeland DR (1994) The science and properties of engineering materials, 3rd edn. PWS Publishing Co, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/composite materials. Accessed 12/05/2011

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. D. Omah
    • 1
  • V. S. Aigbodion
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. C. Madu
    • 1
  • E. O. Oji
    • 1
  • U. U. Uyor
    • 1
  • S. Ude
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical & Materials EngineeringUniversity of NigeriaNsukkaNigeria
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering Science DepartmentUniversity of JohannesburgAuckland ParkSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations