Advertisement

A slip-line model for serrated chip formation in machining of stainless steel and validation

  • Alper UysalEmail author
  • I. S. Jawahir
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

Machining of difficult-to-cut materials producing serrated chip formation has generated a significant interest among academic researchers and industry groups because of the need for understanding the fundamental mechanisms to model the process. Therefore, various analytical and numerical models have been developed in the recent past to investigate such machining operations. The slip-line theory is one of the established modeling methods, but slip-line modeling of serrated chip formation has not been investigated adequately. In this study, a new slip-line model for serrated chip formation in machining with rounded cutting edge tool is presented along with its associated hodograph. In addition, Oxley’s theory was integrated to the proposed slip-line model for stainless steel material, and the model was validated by experimental results. A good agreement between the experimental and analytically predicted results was obtained. The proposed slip-line model offers predictions of cutting and thrust forces, ploughing force, maximum and minimum chip thickness values, tool–chip contact length, chip up-curl radius, thickness of the primary shear zone, angular position of the stagnation point, shear strain, shear strain rate at the shear plane, and the prevalent flow stress.

Keywords

Slip-line model Serrated chip Oxley’s theory Stainless steel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Alper Uysal acknowledges financial support from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK) BIDEB-2219 Postdoctoral Research Program.

References

  1. 1.
    Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prager W, Hodge PG Jr (1951) Theory of perfectly plastic solids. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prager W (1953) A geometrical discussion on the slip line field in plane plastic flow, vol 65. Transaction of Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Green AP (1951) The use of plasticine models to simulate the plastic flow of metals. Philos Mag 42:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Green AP (1954) On the use of hodograph in problems of plane plastic strain. J Mech Phys Solids 2:73–80MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson W (1962) Some slip-line fields for swaging and expanding, indenting, extruding and machining for tools with curved dies. Int J Mech Sci 4:323–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Usui E, Hoshi K (1963) Slip-line fields in metal machining which involve centered fans, Proceedings of International Production Engineering Research Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 61–71Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Usui E, Kikuchi K, Hoshi K (1964) The theory of plasticity applied to machining with cut-away tools. J Eng Ind 86(2):95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kudo H (1965) Some new slip-line solutions for two-dimensional steady-state machining. Int J Mech Sci 7:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson W, Mahtab FU (1965) Some solutions using slip-line fields and the method of upper bounds for milling, turning and boring, Proceedings of 6th International Machine Tool Design Research Conference, Manchester, England, pp. 463Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dewhurst P, Collins IF (1973) A matrix technique for constructing slip-line field solutions to a class of plane strain plasticity problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 7:357–378CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dewhurst P (1978) On the non-uniqueness of the machining process. Proc R Soc London Ser A 360:587–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Challen JM (1983) Slip-line fields (for polishing) with a cylindrically shaped abrasive grit, Research Report No. 1983/AM/1. School of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Challen JM, Oxley PLB (1984) Some new thoughts on the mechanisms of sliding and sticking friction in metal working processes. Adv Technol Plast 1:127–132Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shi T, Ramalingam S (1993) Modeling chip formation with grooved tools. Int J Mech Sci 35(9):741–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waldorf DJ, DeVor RE, Kapoor SG (1998) A slip-line field for ploughing during orthogonal cutting. J Manuf Sci Eng 120:693–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maity KP, Das NS (1998) A slip-line solution to metal machining using a cutting tool with a step-type chip-breaker. J Mater Process Technol 79:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maity KP, Das NS (1999) A class of slip-line field solutions for metal machining with elastic contact. J Mater Process Technol 96:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maity KP, Das NS (2001) A class of slip-line field solutions for metal machining with Coulomb friction at the chip-tool interface. J Mater Process Technol 116:278–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maity KP, Das NS (2001) A class of slipline field solutions for metal machining with slipping and sticking contact at the chip-tool interface. Int J Mech Sci 43:2435–2452CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smithey DW, Kapoor SG, DeVor RE (2001) A new mechanistic model for predicting worn tool cutting forces. Mach Sci Technol 5(1):23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fang N, Jawahir IS, Oxley PLB (2001) A universal slip-line model with non-unique solutions for machining with curled chip formation and a restricted contact tool. Int J Mech Sci 43:557–580CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fang N, Jawahir IS (2002) Analytical predictions and experimental validation of cutting force ratio, chip thickness, and chip back-flow angle in restricted contact machining using the universal slip-line model. Int J Mach Tool Manu 42:681–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fang N, Jawahir IS (2001) A new methodology for determining the stress state of the plastic region in machining with restricted contact tools. Int J Mech Sci 43:1747–1770CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fang N, Jawahir IS (2002) An analytical predictive model and experimental validation for machining with grooved tools incorporating the effects of strains, strain-rates and temperatures. Ann CIRP 51(1):83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fang N (2002) Machining with tool–chip contact on the tool secondary rake face—part I: a new slip-line model. Int J Mech Sci 44:2337–2354CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fang N (2002) Machining with tool–chip contact on the tool secondary rake face—part II: analysis and discussion. Int J Mech Sci 44:2355–2368CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fang N, Jawahir IS (2003) Analytical prediction of the chip back-flow angle in machining with restricted contact grooved tools. J Manuf Sci Eng 125:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang X, Jawahir IS (2003) Prediction of tool-chip interface friction and chip-groove effects in machining with restricted contact grooved tools using the universal slip-line model. Key Eng Mater 233-236:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fang N (2003) Slip-line modeling of machining with a rounded-edge tool—part I: new model and theory. J Mech Phys Solids 51:715–742CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fang N (2003) Slip-line modeling of machining with a rounded-edge tool—part II: analysis of the size effect and the shear strain-rate. J Mech Phys Solids 51:743–762CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fang N, Yang J, Liu N (2004) Analytical predictive modelling of serrated chip formation in high speed machining of 7075-T6 aluminum alloy, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, California USA, pp. 769–777Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fang N, Wu Q (2005) The effects of chamfered and honed tool edge geometry in machining of three aluminum alloys. Int J Mach Tool Manu 45:1178–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Das NS, Dundur ST (2005) Slipline field solutions for metal machining with adhesion friction and elastic effects at the chip-tool contact region. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 219(1):57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Das NS, Dundur ST (2006) A slipline field analysis of free-chip orthogonal machining with adhesion friction at rake face. Mach Sci Technol 10(3):371–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fang N, Dewhurst P (2005) Slip-line modeling of built-up edge formation in machining. Int J Mech Sci 47:1079–1098CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang X, Jawahir IS (2007) Recent advances in plasticity applications in metal machining: slip-line models for machining with rounded cutting edge restricted contact grooved tools. Int J Mach Mach Mater 2(3–4):347–360Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dundur ST, Das NS (2009) Slipline field modeling of orthogonal machining for a worn tool with elastic effects and adhesion friction at the contact regions. J Mater Process Technol 209:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jin X, Altintas Y (2011) Slip-line field model of micro-cutting process with round tool edge effect. J Mater Process Technol 211:339–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ozturk S, Altan E (2012) Slip-line metal cutting model with negative rake angle. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 34(3):246–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ozturk S, Altan E (2012) A slip-line approach to the machining with rounded-edge tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Uysal A, Altan E (2011) A new slip-line field modeling of orthogonal machining for a worn tool. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Models and Modelling Methodologies in Science and Engineering, Orlando, Florida, USA, vol 3, pp 193–198Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Uysal A, Altan E (2014) Experimental investigation of a slip-line field model for a worn cutting tool. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 228(8):1398–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Uysal A, Altan E (2016) Slip-line field modelling of rounded-edge cutting tool for orthogonal machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 230(10):1925–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Uysal A, Altan E (2014) A new slip-line field modeling of orthogonal machining with a rounded-edge worn cutting tool. Mach Sci Technol 18(3):386–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Oxley PLB (1989) Mechanics of machining—an analytical approach to assessing machinability. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Manyindo BM (1984) An experimental and theoretical investigation of forces and chip geometry as a basis of machinability assessment when machining various materials, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Manyindo BM, Oxley PLB (1986) Modelling the catastrophic shear type of chip when machining stainless steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 200(5):349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hill R (1954) On the limits set by plastic yielding to the intensity of singularities of stress. J Mech Phys Solids 2:278–285MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wu Q (2007) Serrated chip formation and tool-edge wear in high-speed machining of advanced aerospace materials, Ph.D. dissertation, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USAGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Joshi S, Tewari A, Joshi SS (2015) Microstructural characterization of chip segmentation under different machining environments in orthogonal machining of Ti6Al4V. J Eng Mater Technol 137:011005-1-16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute for Sustainable ManufacturingUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringYildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations