Advertisement

Evaluation of specific cutting energy considering effects of cutting tool geometry during micro-machining process

  • P. Cui
  • Z. Y. ShiEmail author
  • X. Li
  • N. M. Duan
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Sustainability is a growing interest in basic industry. The ultimate goal for manufacturing industry is environmental releases, and sustainable development. By reducing energy consumption, economic and environmental performance can be significantly improved for the manufacturing systems. In this paper, the cutting force and specific cutting energy (SCE) consumption are evaluated based on the calculated material removal volume. Three different cutting tool geometries, including the C-, D-, and T-shaped turning indexable tools, are examined to investigate how cutting tool geometry affects the cutting force and SCE. Experimental research and theoretical modeling analysis have been conducted. Statistical analysis for theoretical and experimental SCE has been conducted to extract the effect of each factor on variation. Results of this research show that the more volume of cutting tool involved into the workpiece, the smaller the SCE produced. Optimal setting for sustainability target in terms of minimum cutting energy being consumed could be obtained through the established model.

Keywords

Specific cutting energy Cutting force Tool geometry Volume of cutting tool 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51505255). This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University and the Yong Scholars Program of Shandong University.

References

  1. 1.
    Park CW, Kwon KS, Kim WB (2009) Energy consumption reduction technology in manufacturing—a selective review of policies, standards, and research. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 10(5):151–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhushan RK (2013) Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing power consumption and maximizing tool life during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites. J Clean Prod 39:242–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu K, Luo M, Tang K (2016) Machine based energy-saving tool path generation for five-axis end milling of freeform surfaces. J Clean Prod 139:1207–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luo M, Luo H, Axinte D, Liu D, Mei J, Liao Z (2018) A wireless instrumented milling cutter system with embedded PVDF sensors. Mech Syst Signal Process 110:556–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luo M, Luo H, Zhang D, Tang K (2018) Improving tool life in multi-axis milling of Ni-based superalloy with ball-end cutter based on the active cutting edge shift strategy. J Mater Process Technol 252:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cardoso P, Davim JP (2012) A brief review on micromachining of materials. Rev Adv Mater Sci 30:98–102Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davim J, Jackson M (2009) Nano and micromachining. Wiley-ISTE, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng K, Huo D (2013) Micro cutting: fundamentals and applications. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu T, Cheng K (2013) Micro milling performance assessment of diamond-like carbon coatings on a micro-end mill. Proc IMechE J J Eng Trib 227:1038–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Velchev S, Kolev I, Ivanov K, Gechevski S (2014) Empirical models for specific energy consumption and optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing energy consumption during turning. J Clean Prod 80:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Astakhov VP, Xiao XA (2008) A methodology for practical cutting force evaluation based on the energy spent in the cutting system. Mach Sci Technol 12:325–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rajemi MF, Mativenga PT, Aramcharoen A (2010) Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations. J Clean Prod 18:1059–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun C, Bi QZ, Wang YH, Huang ND (2015) Improving cutter life and cutting efficiency of five-axis plunge milling by simulation and tool path regeneration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(5–8):965–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balogun VA, Edem IF, Mativenga PT (2016) E-smart toolpath machining strategy for process planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(5–8):1499–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Avram OI, Xirouchakis P (2011) Evaluating the use phase energy requirements of a machine tool system. J Clean Prod 19(6–7):699–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aggarwal A, Singh H, Kumar P, Singh M (2008) Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi’s technique e a comparative analysis. J Mater Process Technol 200:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Draganescu F, Gheorghe M, Doicin CV (2003) Models of machine tool efficiency and specific consumed energy. J Mater Process Technol 141:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kobayashi T (2009) Progress of NTN’s bearing technology in the past quarter century and its future perspective. J JSPE 75(1):130–131Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nakamura S, Miyaguchi K (2009) Technical development of precision bearing and ball screw. J JSPE 75(1):121–122Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thepsonthi T, Özel T (2014) An integrated toolpath and process parameter optimization for high-performance micro-milling process of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(1–4):57–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davim JP, Mata F (2008) Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) diamond coated tools performance in machining of PEEK composites. Mater Des 29:1568–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liow JL (2009) Mechanical micromachining: a sustainable micro-device manufacturing approach. J Clean Prod 17(7):662–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li W, Kara S (2011) An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of manufacturing processes: a case of turning. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manuf 225(9):1636–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mativenga PT, Rajemi MF (2011) Calculation of optimum cutting parameters based on minimum energy footprint. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Su GS, Liu ZQ (2011) The analysis of saw-tooth chip formation in high speed machining through material micro-hardness measurement. Adv Mater Res 188:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Popov A, Dugin A (2014) Study of reasons of increased active force using coolant with uncut chip thickness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:1555–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu J, Liu ZQ (2010) Modeling of flow stress in orthogonal micro-cutting process based on strain gradient plasticity theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shi ZY, Liu ZQ (2010) The actual geometry of the cutting tool involved in machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shaw MC (1984) Metal cutting principles. Oxford Science Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luan X, Zhang S, Cai G (2016) Optimal cutting parameters to reduce power consumption in face milling of a cast iron alloy for environmental sustainability. Sustainable design and manufacturing 2016. SDM 2016. In: Smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol 52. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Astakhov VP, Shvets SV (2001) A novel approach to operating force evaluation in high strain rate metal-deforming technological processes. J Mater Process Technol 117(1–2):226–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chhabildas LC, Thornhill TF, Reinhart WD (2001) Fracture resistant properties of AerMet steels. Int J Impact Eng 26:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ji GL, Li FG, Li QH (2010) Prediction of the hot deformation behavior for Aermet100 steel using an artificial neural network[J]. Comput Mater Sci 48:626–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Özel T, Ulutan D (2014) Effects of machining parameters and tool geometry on serrated chip formation, specific forces and energies in orthogonal cutting of nickel-based super alloy Inconel 100. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manuf 228(7):673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang T, Liu ZQ, Xu CH (2015) Theoretical modeling and experimental validation of specific cutting force for micro end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(5):1433–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang B, Liu ZQ, Song QH, Wan Y, Shi ZY (2016) Proper selection of cutting parameters and cutting tool angle to lower the specific cutting energy during high speed machining of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy. J Clean Prod 39:292–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture (Shandong University), Ministry of EducationJinanChina

Personalised recommendations