Advertisement

Modeling of surface topography based on cutting vibration in ball-end milling of thin-walled parts

  • Zhenhua WangEmail author
  • Boxiang Wang
  • Juntang Yuan
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Because of the low rigidity of thin-walled parts, the cutting vibration is commonly encountered and has a vital influence on machined surface quality. Theoretical simulation of surface topography is one of the main methods to evaluate and control surface quality in practice. In this paper, a simulation model of surface topography is developed based on cutting edge motion model that incorporates the dynamics of thin-walled parts milling system. The theoretical model used to describe the trajectory of cutting edge takes tool vibration and workpiece vibration into account. Then, the influence of system vibration on surface topography is investigated. Particularly, a new method is proposed in this paper to predict the texture interval, texture distribution, and residual height for different milling areas by identifying the dynamic characteristics of thin-walled parts. In addition, the validity of surface topography model is conducted by experiment. The results show that the simulated topography is consistent with the experimental topography, and the model is proved to be able to predict roughness accurately.

Keywords

Surface topography Thin-walled parts Ball-end milling Vibration Roughness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51775280 and No. 51675285), and the National Science and Technology Major Project (2013ZX04002-011).

References

  1. 1.
    Li ZL, Tuysuz O, Zhu LM, Altintas Y (2018) Surface form error prediction in five-axis flank milling of thin-walled parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 128:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denkena B, Boess V, Nespor D, Floeter F, Rust F (2015) Engine blade regeneration: a literature review on common technologies in terms of machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(5–8):917–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang Z, Li HG, Liu XB, Zhang WY, Meng G (2018) Chatter mitigation for the milling of thin-walled workpiece. Int J Mech Sci 138:262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butt MA, Yang YQ, Pei XZ, Liu Q (2018) Five-axis milling vibration attenuation of freeform thin-walled part by eddy current damping. Precis Eng 51:682–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu C (2008) Study on prediction of surface quality in machining process. J Mater Process Technol 205(1–3):439–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2003) Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(8):833–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quinsat Y, Lavernhe S, Lartigue C (2011) Characterization of 3D surface topography in 5-axis milling. Wear 271(3–4):590–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peng ZX, Jiao L, Yan P, Yuan MX, Gao SF, Yi J, Wang XB (2018) Simulation and experimental study on 3D surface topography in micro-ball-end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5–8):1943–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J, Dominguez-Fernandez A (2012) Surface topography in ball-end milling processes as a function of feed per tooth and radial depth of cut. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 53(1):151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao K, Hockauf R, Liu ZB, Zhao WX, Wang XB, Wang DQ (2018) Kinematic and stochastic surface topography of workpiece made of Al7075 in flank milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5–8):2735–2745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lazoglu I (2003) Sculpture surface machining: a generalized model of ball-end milling force system. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(5):453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang Q, Zhang S, Shi WH (2018) Modeling of surface topography based on relationship between feed per tooth and radial depth of cut in ball-end milling of AISI H13 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9–12):4199–4209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang ZH, Yuan JT, Yin ZB, Hu XQ (2016) Surface topography and roughness of high-speed milled AlMn1Cu. Chin J Mech Eng 29(6):1200–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang C, Guo S, Zhang HY, Zhou LS (2013) Modeling and predicting for surface topography considering tool wear in milling process. J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9–12):2849–2860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Omar OEEK, El-Wardany T, Ng E, Elbestawi MA (2007) An improved cutting force and surface topography prediction model in end milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(7–8):1263–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li B, Cao YL, Chen WH, Pan J (2017) Geometry simulation and evaluation of the surface topography in five-axis ball-end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):1651–1667Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hao YS, Liu Y (2017) Analysis of milling surface roughness prediction for thin-walled parts with curved surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):2289–2297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    González H, Calleja A, Pereira O, Ortega N, de Lacalle LNL, Barton M (2018) Super abrasive machining of integral rotary components using grinding flank tools. Metals 8(1):833–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peigne G, Paris H, Brissaud D, Gouskov A (2004) Impact of the cutting dynamics of small radial immersion milling operations on machined surface roughness. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(11):1133–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Surmann T, Enk D (2007) Simulation of milling tool vibration trajectories along changing engagement conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(9):1442–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Surmann T, Biermann D (2008) The effect of tool vibrations on the flank surface created by peripheral milling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):375–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiang H, Long XH, Meng G (2008) Study of the correlation between surface generation and cutting vibrations in peripheral milling. J Mater Process Technol 208(1–3):229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liang XG, Yao ZG (2013) Dynamic-based simulation for machined surface topography in 5-axis ball-end milling. J Mech Eng 49(6):171–178MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liang XG, Yao ZG (2013) Study on milling stability with varying time delay in 5-axis ball-end finishing. Shanghai Jiao Tong University 2013:109–119Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arizmendi M, Campa FJ, Fernandez J, de Lacalle LNL, Gil A, Bilbao E, Veiga F, Lamikiz A (2009) Model for surface topography prediction in peripheral milling considering tool vibration. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):93–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Arizmendi M, Fernandez J, de Lacalle LNL, Lamikiz A, Gil A, Sanchez JA, Campa FJ, Veiga F (2008) Model development for the prediction of surface topography generated by ball-end mills taking into account the tool parallel axis offset. Experimental validation. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee KY, Kang MC, Jeong YH, Lee DW, Kim JS (2001) Simulation of surface roughness and profile in high-speed end milling. J Mater Process Technol 113(1–3):410–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peng FY, Wu J, Fang ZL, Yuan S, Yan R, Bai QS (2013) Modeling and controlling of surface micro-topography feature in micro-ball-end milling. J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9–12):2657–2670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peng FY, Fang ZL, Wu J (2012) Three-dimensional surface topography simulation of ultraprecision milling based on point cloud. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Nature Science 40(8):1–6Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Altintas Y, Lee P (1998) Mechanics and dynamics of ball end milling. J Manuf Sci Eng 120(4):684–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Engin S, Altintas Y (2001) Mechanics and dynamics of general milling cutters. Part I: helical end mills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(15):2195–2212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gradisek J, Kalveram M, Weinert K (2004) Mechanistic identification of specific force coefficients for a general end mill. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(4):401–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qu S, Zhao JB, Wang TR (2016) Three-dimensional stability prediction and chatter analysis in milling of thin-walled plate. J Adv Manuf Technol 86(5–8):2291–2300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center of High-End Equipment Manufacturing Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information TechnologyNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations