Investigation on the effect of mandrels on hollow shafts in cross-wedge rolling

  • Xu Huang
  • Baoyu WangEmail author
  • Yanhong Mu
  • Jinxia Shen
  • Junling Li
  • Jing Zhou


Cross-wedge rolling (CWR) hollow shafts with mandrels can control the hole contour and reduce internal defects so that the working conditions for the shafts can be met. The diameter of the mandrel plays an important role in this forming process. In this study, numerical simulations and experimental trials were conducted as part of a detailed investigation on the mechanism of a mandrel and its influence on the forming quality of CWR hollow shafts. The contact areas between the mandrel and workpiece, the rolling forces of the mandrel, stress-strain fields, metal flows and temperatures were analysed in detail. The gaps on the surface of dies designed to prevent torsion failure of the rolled piece lead to noticeable steps on the surface of the rolled piece, as the relative diameter of the mandrel is too large. The diameter and non-circularity of the outer and inner surface increase with the increase of the relative diameter of the mandrel. The results can provide theoretical guidance for the production application of cross-wedge rolling hollow shafts with mandrels.


Cross-wedge rolling Hollow shafts Mechanism of mandrel Forming quality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Funding information

This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. FRF-BD-17-003A). This work is also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51875036, Grant No.51705018).


  1. 1.
    Hu ZH, Zhang KS, Wang BY, Shu XD, Yang CP (2004) Forming technology and simulation of cross wedge rolling parts. Metall Ind Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmoeckel D, Speck FD (1995) Axial-radial forming of tubular components. CIRP Annals Manuf Tech 44(1):235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen J, Chandrashekhara K, Lekakh SN, Richards VL (2012) Study of void closure in hot radial forging process using 3d nonlinear finite element analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 62(9–12):1001–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li D, Yang H, Guo LG, Zeng WD, Zhang J (2015) Study on exit temperature evolution during extrusion for large-scale thick-walled inconel 625 pipe by FE simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 76(5–8):1421–1435Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbara R, Lorenzo D, Luca T (2016) Multi-goal optimization of industrial extrusion dies by means of meta-models. Int J Adv Manuf Tech:1–13Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pater Z, Gontarz A, Tomczak J, Bulzak T (2015) Producing hollow drive shafts by rotary compression. Arch Civ Mech Eng 15(4):917–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tomczak J, Pater Z, Bulzak T (2016) The influence of hollow billet thickness in rotary compression. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 82(5–8):1281–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang KS, Wang BY, Liu JP, Hu ZH (2000) Research on wall thickness of hollow workpiece rolled by cross wedge rolling. Forg Stam Technol 23(2):34–36Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang KS, Liu JP, Wang BY, Hu ZH (2001) Analysis on stable rolling condition of hollow workpiece rolled by cross wedge rolling. J Univ Sci Technol Beijing 23(2):155–157Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang JL, Xu CG, Ren GS (2000) The numerical simulation on hollow part’s precise sizing process with cross-wedge rolling. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Science) 1:248–252Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bartnicki J, Pater Z (2005) Numerical simulation of three-rolls cross-wedge rolling of hollowed shaft. J Mater Process Tech 164(20):1154–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bartnicki J, Pater Z (2004) The aspects of stability in cross-wedge rolling processes of hollowed shafts. J Mater Process Tech 155-156(1):1867–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pater Z, Bartnicki J (2006) Wedge-rolls rolling of hollowed parts. J Ach Mater Manu Eng 18(1–2):407–410Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Urankar S, Lovell M, Morrow C, Li Q, Kawada K (2006) Establishment of failure conditions for the cross-wedge rolling of hollow shafts. J Mater Process Tech 177(1–3):545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Urankar S, Lovell M, Morrow C, Li Q, Kawada K (2006) Development of a critical friction model for cross wedge rolling hollow shafts. J Mater Process Tech 177(1–3):539–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peng WF, Zheng SH, Chiu Y, Shu XD, Zhan LH (2016) Multi-wedge cross wedge rolling process of 42CrMo4 large and long hollow shaft. Rare Metal Mater Eng 45(4):836–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ji HC, Liu JP, Wang BY, Lin JG, Tang XF (2016) The process parameters effect of ovality in cross wedge rolling for hollow valve without mandril. MATEC Web Conf 80:13003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ji HC, Liu JP, Wang BY, Tang XF, Huo YM, Zhou J, Hu ZH (2016) Constitutive relationship of 4Cr9Si2 and technological parameters on the inner bore of cross wedge rolling for preform hollow valves. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 86(9–12):1–13Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ji HC, Liu JP, Wang BY, Zheng ZH, Huang JH, Hu ZH (2015) Cross-wedge rolling of a 4Cr9Si2 hollow valve: explorative experiment and finite element simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 77(1–4):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    YangYM CFW, Chen JC, Zhao J (2013) Study on load of hollow motor shaft by 4-roll cross wedge rolling. App Mech Mater 288:267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Landgrebe D, Steger J, Böhmichen U, Bergmann M (2018) Modified cross-wedge rolling for creating hollow shafts. Procedia Manuf 21:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Neugebauer R, Kolbe M, Glass R (2001) New warm forming processes to produce hollow shafts. J Mater Process Tech 119(1):277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neugebauer R, Glass R, Kolbe M, Hoffmann M (2002) Optimisation of processing routes for cross rolling and spin extrusion. J Mater Process Tech 125(36):856–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neugebauer R, Glass R, Hoffmann M (2005) Spin extrusion-a new partial forming technology based on 7 nc-axes machining. CIRP Annals-Manuf Tech 54(1):241–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jiang Y, Wang BY, Hu ZH, Lin JG (2011) Numerical simulation for thick-walled hollow axle during cross wedge rolling. Adv Mater Research 337:270–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peng WF, Zhang JH, Huang GX, Liu WP, Shu XD, Zhu J (2016) Stress distributions during the cross-wedge rolling of composite 42CrMo/Q235 laminated shafts. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 83(1–4):145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu ZJ, Peng WF, Shu XD (2017) Influence of rolling temperature on interface properties of the cross wedge rolling of 42CrMo/Q235 laminated shaft. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 91(1–4):517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ji HC, Liu JP, Wang BY, Fu XB, Xiao WC, Hu ZH (2017) A new method for manufacturing hollow valves via cross wedge rolling and forging: numerical analysis and experiment validation. J Mater Process Tech 240:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang CP, Hu ZH (2016) Research on the ovality of hollow shafts in cross wedge rolling with mandrel. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 83(1–4):67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yang CP, Ma JW, Hu ZH (2017) Analysis and design of cross wedge rolling hollow axle sleeve with mandrel. J Mater Process Tech 239:346–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fu XB, Wang BY, Zhu XX, Tang XF, Ji HC (2016) Numerical and experimental investigations on large-diameter gear rolling with local induction heating process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 91(1–4):1–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xu Huang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Baoyu Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yanhong Mu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jinxia Shen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Junling Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jing Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Metal Lightweight Forming and ManufacturingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations