Observed edge radius behavior during MD nanomachining of silicon at a high uncut chip thickness

  • Lukman N. AbdulkadirEmail author
  • Khaled Abou-El-Hossein


During ultraprecision turning of optical silicon, size effect determined by the ratio of undeformed chip thickness to tool cutting edge radius remains an important determinant of both compressive and shear stresses in the workpiece around the cutting edge (cutting zone). Plastic deformation which is a factor of both stresses is considered crucial to achieving appropriate and effective result. Invariably, since plastic deformation is required to ensure chip formation/removal in ductile mode, this ratio therefore does not only determine surface damage but also determine tool longevity. Although it has been established that nanoscale ductile mode cutting of optical silicon requires small undeformed chip thickness as compared cutting edge radius, it is however still important to study the characteristic behavior of workpiece and tool and the attained surface when turning is done at edge radius less than undeformed chip thickness. The high ratio resulting from high uncut chip thickness to edge radius as studied with molecular dynamics (MD) showed the superiority of low edge radius as compared the higher edge during nanometric silicon turning. Aside from both tool wear and kinetic friction which were evidently higher with the smaller edge radius, all other studied parameters appeared better with the smaller edge radius as compared the bigger edge when turning was done at uncut chip thickness higher and equal to the edge radius. Also, tool rake wear was observed to be prominent than flank wear in all the tested tools, even though it was highly pronounced with the 5 Å edged radius tool.


Molecular dynamics Undeformed chip thickness Ultraprecision turning Tool edge radius Phase transformation Coordination number Cutting force Thrust force Wear 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This is to acknowledge the intervention of Research Capacity Development of Nelson Mandela University (RCD) for the providing necessary fund to enable the completion of this research (RCD NMU No. s215102134). Our sincere appreciation also goes to Prof. Khaled Habou-El-Hossien for the guidance and support in carrying out this study. Worthy of mentioning is the South African Center for High Performance Computing for the use of both Material Studio software and cluster. We are particularly grateful to Dr. Krishna K. Govender for his tireless attention when called upon.


  1. 1.
    Komanduri R, Chandrasekaran N, Raff L (1998) Effect of tool geometry in nanometric cutting: a molecular dynamics simulation approach. Wear 219(1):84–97Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Komanduri R, Chandrasekaran N, Raff L (2001) MD simulation of exit failure in nanometric cutting. Mater Sci Eng A 311(1–2):1–12Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdulkadir LN, Abou-El-Hossein K, Jumare AI, Liman MM, Olaniyan TA, Odedeyi PB (2018) Review of molecular dynamics/experimental study of diamond-silicon behavior in nanoscale machining. Int J Adv Manuf TechnolGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nalbant M, Altin A, Gokkaya H (2007) The effect of cutting speed and cutting tool geometry on machinability properties of nickel-base Inconel 718 super alloys. Mater Des 28(4):1334–1338Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hughes J, Sharman A, Ridgway K (2006) The effect of cutting tool material and edge geometry on tool life and workpiece surface integrity. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 220(2):93–107Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abdulkadir LN, Abou-El-Hossein K, Jumare AI, Odedeyi PB, Liman MM, Olaniyan TA (2018) Ultra-precision diamond turning of optical silicon—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:173–208Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jumare AI, Abou-El-Hossein K, Abdulkadir L (2017) Review of ultra-high precision diamond turning of silicon for infrared optics. PONTE Int Sci Res J 73(11):58–123Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cai MB, Li XP, Rahman M (2007) Study of the mechanism of nanoscale ductile mode cutting of silicon using molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Mach Tool Manu 47(1):75–80Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cai MB, Li XP, Rahman M, Tay AAO (2007) Crack initiation in relation to the tool edge radius and cutting conditions in nanoscale cutting of silicon. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(3–4):562–569Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arif M, Xinquan Z, Rahman M, Kumar S (2013) A predictive model of the critical undeformed chip thickness for ductile–brittle transition in nano-machining of brittle materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 64:114–122Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blake PN, Scattergood RO (1990) Ductile-regime machining of germanium and silicon. J Am Ceram Soc 73(4):949–957Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Puttick KE, Rudman MR, Smith KJ, Franks A, Lindsey K (1870) Single-point diamond machining of glasses. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 1989(426):19–30Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marsh ER, Sommer EJ, Deakyne TRS, Kim GA, Simonson JA (2010) Detection of orientation-dependent, single-crystal diamond tool edge wear using cutting force sensors, while spin-turning silicon. Precis Eng J Int Soc Precis Eng Nanotechnol 34(2):253–258Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Obata K (2016) Single-crystal diamond cutting tool for ultra-precision processing. Sei Tech Rev 82:83Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mabrouki T, Courbon C, Zhang Y, Rech J, Nélias D, Asad M et al (2016) Some insights on the modelling of chip formation and its morphology during metal cutting operations. C R Mec 344(4):335–354Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jain L, Bajpai R, Basu R, Misra DS, Samajdar I (2017) Delamination/rupture of polycrystalline diamond film: defining role of shear anisotropy. Cryst Growth Des 17(4):1514–1523Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mimbo C (2008) Study of nanoscale ductile mode cutting of silicon using molecular dynamics simulation, PhD Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cai MB, Li XP, Rahman M (2007) Study of the temperature and stress in nanoscale ductile mode cutting of silicon using molecular dynamics simulation. J Mater Process Technol 192-193:607–612Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arefin S, Li X, Cai M, Rahman M, Liu K, Tay A (2007) The effect of the cutting edge radius on a machined surface in the nanoscale ductile mode cutting of silicon wafer. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221(2):213–220Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Han X, Lin B, Yu S, Wang S (2002) Investigation of tool geometry in nanometric cutting by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mater Process Technol 129(1):105–108Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang P, Zhao H, Zhang L, Shi C, Huang H (2014) A study on material removal caused by phase transformation of monocrystalline silicon during nanocutting process via molecular dynamics simulation. J Comput Theor Nanosci 11(1):291–296Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yan J, Yoshino M, Kuriagawa T, Shirakashi T, Syoji K, Komanduri R (2001) On the ductile machining of silicon for micro electro-mechanical systems (MEMS), opto-electronic and optical applications. Mater Sci Eng A 297(1–2):230–234Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blackley W, Scattergood RO (1991) Ductile-regime machining model for diamond turning of brittle materials. Precis Eng 13(2):95–103Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117(1):1–19zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chavoshi SZ, Luo X (2016) An atomistic simulation investigation on chip related phenomena in nanometric cutting of single crystal silicon at elevated temperatures. Comput Mater Sci 113:1–10Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chavoshi SZ, Luo X (2016) Atomic-scale characterization of occurring phenomena during hot nanometric cutting of single crystal 3C–SiC. RSC Adv 6(75):71409–71424Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirel P (2015) Atomsk: a tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files. Comput Phys Commun 197:212–219Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Module F (2011) Material Studio 6.0. Accelrys Inc., San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33–38Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stukowski A (2009) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO—the Open Visualization Tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18(1):015012MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Erhart P, Albe K (2005) Analytical potential for atomistic simulations of silicon, carbon, and silicon carbide. Phys Rev B 71(3):035211Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Promyoo R, El-Mounayri H, Yang X (2008) Molecular dynamics simulation of nanometric machining under realistic cutting conditions.In Proceedings of ASME International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Engineering. p 235–243Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dai H, Li S, Chen G (2018) Comparison of subsurface damages on mono-crystalline silicon between traditional nanoscale machining and laser-assisted nanoscale machining via molecular dynamics simulation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 414:61–67Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dai H, Chen G, Li S, Fang Q, Hu B (2017) Influence of laser nanostructured diamond tools on the cutting behavior of silicon by molecular dynamics simulation. RSC Adv 7(25):15596–15612Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dai H, Chen G, Zhou C, Fang Q, Fei X (2017) A numerical study of ultraprecision machining of monocrystalline silicon with laser nano-structured diamond tools by atomistic simulation. Appl Surf Sci 393:405–416Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang ZG, Fang FZ, Hu XT, Sun CK (2009) Molecular dynamics study on various nanometric cutting boundary conditions. J Vac Sci Technol B: Microelectron Nanometer Struct 27(3):1355Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhu B, Zhao D, Zhao H, Guan J, Hou P, Wang S et al (2017) A study on the surface quality and brittle–ductile transition during the elliptical vibration-assisted nanocutting process on monocrystalline silicon via molecular dynamic simulations. RSC Adv 7(7):4179–4189Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhu B, Zhao H, Zhao D, Zhang P, Yang Y, Han L et al (2016) Effects of vibration frequency on vibration-assisted nano-scratch process of mono-crystalline copper via molecular dynamics simulation. AIP Adv 6(3):035015Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang Z, Chen P, Qin F (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation on subsurface damage layer during nano grinding process of silicon wafer. In: Electronic Packaging Technology (ICEPT), 2017 18th International Conference on 2017. p 487–490Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dai H, Chen G (2017) A molecular dynamics investigation into the mechanisms of material removal and subsurface damage of nanoscale high speed laser-assisted machining. Mol Simul 43(1):42–51MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Goel S, Luo XC, Agrawal A, Reuben RL (Jan 2015) Diamond machining of silicon: a review of advances in molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Mach Tool Manu 88:131–164Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Goel S, Stukowski A, Kovalchenko A, Cross G (2016) Self-healing of cracks during ductile regime machining of silicon: insights from molecular dynamics simulation. In: euspen’s 16th International Conference & Exhibition, University of Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Goel S, Kovalchenko A, Stukowski A, Cross G (2016) Influence of microstructure on the cutting behaviour of silicon. Acta Mater 105:464–478Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kumagai T, Izumi S, Hara S, Sakai S (2007) Development of bond-order potentials that can reproduce the elastic constants and melting point of silicon for classical molecular dynamics simulation. Comput Mater Sci 39(2):457–464Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ohira T, Inamuro T, Adachi T (1994) Molecular dynamics simulation of amorphous silicon with Tersoff potential. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 34(1):565–570Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang Y, Shi J (2013) Effects of water molecules on tribological behavior and property measurements in nano-indentation processes-a numerical analysis. Nanoscale Res Lett 8(1):389Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Moura CS, Amaral L (2005) Molecular dynamics simulation of silicon nanostructures. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 228(1–4):37–40Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kim WK, Kim BH (2017) A molecular dynamics study on atomistic mechanisms of nano-scale cutting process of sapphire. J Mech Sci Technol 31(9):4353–4362Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Singh K, Vaishya RO, Singh H, Mishra V, Ramagopal S (2013) Investigation of tool life & surface roughness during single point diamond turning of silicon. Int J Sci Res 2(6):265–267Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yan J, Zhao H, Kuriyagawa T (2009) Effects of tool edge radius on ductile machining of silicon: an investigation by FEM. Semicond Sci Technol 24(7):075018Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Luo X, Goel S, Reuben RL (2012) A quantitative assessment of nanometric machinability of major polytypes of single crystal silicon carbide. J Eur Ceram Soc 32(12):3423–3434Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zykova-Timan T, Ceresoli D, Tosatti E (2007) Peak effect versus skating in high-temperature nanofriction. Nat Mater 6(3):230Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chen Y, Fang F, Zhang X, Hu X (2010) Molecular dynamics investigation of cutting force in nanometric cutting of monocrystalline silicon. Am J Nanotechnol 1(2):62–67Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chavoshi SZ, Goel S, Luo X (2016) Influence of temperature on the anisotropic cutting behaviour of single crystal silicon: a molecular dynamics simulation investigation. J Manuf Process 23:201–210Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rigatti AMY, de Assis CLF, Coelho RT, Jasinevicius RG, Rodrigues AR 2013 Computational method for calculation of the specific cutting energy. In: International Congress of Mechanical Engineering. p 2710–2715Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lucca D, Seo Y, Rhorer R (1994) Energy dissipation and tool-workpiece contact in ultra-precision machining. Tribol Trans 37(3):651–655Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wu X, Li L, He N, Yao C, Zhao M (2016) Influence of the cutting edge radius and the material grain size on the cutting force in micro cutting. Precis Eng 45:359–364Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dai H, Chen G, Fang Q, Yin J (2016) The effect of tool geometry on subsurface damage and material removal in nanometric cutting single-crystal silicon by a molecular dynamics simulation. Appl Phys A 122(9):804Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cheong W, Zhang L (2000) Molecular dynamics simulation of phase transformations in silicon monocrystals due to nano-indentation. Nanotechnology 11(3):173Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jang J-i, Lance M, Wen S, Tsui TY, Pharr G (2005) Indentation-induced phase transformations in silicon: influences of load, rate and indenter angle on the transformation behavior. Acta Mater 53(6):1759–1770Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhang L, Zhao H, Ma Z, Huang H, Shi C, Zhang W (2012) A study on phase transformation of monocrystalline silicon due to ultra-precision polishing by molecular dynamics simulation. AIP Adv 2(4):899Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fang FZ, Wu H, Zhou W, Hu XT (2007) A study on mechanism of nano-cutting single crystal silicon. J Mater Process Technol 184(1–3):407–410Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cross GL (2011) Silicon nanoparticles: isolation leads to change. Nat Nanotechnol 6(8):467–468Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sun J, Fang L, Han J, Han Y, Chen H, Sun K (2014) Phase transformations of mono-crystal silicon induced by two-body and three-body abrasion in nanoscale. Comput Mater Sci 82:140–150Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gilman JJ (1995) Mechanism of shear-induced metallization. Czechoslov J Phys 45(11):913–919Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wu Y, Huang H, Zou J, Zhang L, Dell J (2010) Nanoscratch-induced phase transformation of monocrystalline Si. Scr Mater 63(8):847–850Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wyen C-F, Wegener K (2010) Influence of cutting edge radius on cutting forces in machining titanium. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 59(1):93–96Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zong W, Cao Z, He C, Sun T (2015) Critical undeformed chip thickness of brittle materials in single point diamond turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(5–8):975–984Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wang J, Zhang X, Fang F (2016) Molecular dynamics study on nanometric cutting of ion implanted silicon. Comput Mater Sci 117:240–250Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kim KW, Lee WY, Sin HC (1999) A finite-element analysis of machining with the tool edge considered. J Mater Process Technol 86(1):45–55Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yang N, Zong W, Wu D, Li Z, Sun T (2017) A study of the ultra-precision truing method for flank face of round nose diamond cutting tool. J Manuf Process 30:124–132Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Li X, He T, Rahman M (2005) Tool wear characteristics and their effects on nanoscale ductile mode cutting of silicon wafer. Wear 259(7–12):1207–1214Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Goel S (2013) An atomistic investigation on the nanometric cutting mechanism of hard, brittle materials, Doctoral dissertation, Heriot-Watt UniversityGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Beyers R (1984) Thermodynamic considerations in refractory metal-silicon-oxygen systems. J Appl Phys 56(1):147–152Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Goel S, Luo X, Reuben RL, Rashid WB (2011) Atomistic aspects of ductile responses of cubic silicon carbide during nanometric cutting. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:589Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Precision Engineering LaboratoryNelson Mandela UniversityPort ElizabethSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations