Advertisement

Mediation analysis of multiple constructs in the relationship between manufacturing and technology and environmental constructs in structural equation model for sustainable manufacturing

  • Keshav ValaseEmail author
  • D. N. Raut
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Sustainable Manufacturing (SM) has been a buzzword for manufacturing industries in present state of intense competition but the research in this field needs to be enhanced towards developing an integrated and comprehensive approach for its adoption. The main objective of this study is to address this need by identifying and quantifying the mediating effects in complex causal structures of various domains by means of path modeling. A partial least square–structural equation modeling (PLS–SEM) is proposed and tested using survey data of Indian engineering manufacturing industries, collected using SurveyMonkey platform by sending emails to 999 organizations. Actual responses received were 87 with 15 incomplete responses giving finally 72 responses with no missing data. The p value for social to environmental domain of 0.640 did not show satisfactory performance at 1% confidence level and indicated a need to address the activities under social domain. For rest hypothesis, the results indicated satisfactory performance of the model, even for “manufacturing and technology” domain which is the endogenous variable. The results of mediation analysis showed a p value of 0.645 for the mediation effect of social domain which is not satisfactory, implying no mediation effect whereas economical domain has a partial mediation effect at 1% confidence level, in the relationship between exogenous construct and target endogenous construct. This research is expected to provide a systematic approach for the enhancement of SM practices in manufacturing firms for further improving decision-making towards controlling environmental impacts of their activities.

Keywords

Environmental Mediation Partial least square Structural equation modeling Sustainable Manufacturing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kibira D, Jain S, & Mclean C (2009) A system dynamics modeling framework for sustainable manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 27th annual system dynamics society conference.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bogue R (2014) Sustainable manufacturing: a critical discipline for the twenty-first century. Assem Autom 34(2):117–122.  https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-01-2014-012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawal SZM, Tahriri F, Jen YH, Case K, Tho NH, Zuhdi A, Mousavi M, Amindoust A, Sakundarini N (2015) Empirical evidence of AMT practices and sustainable environmental initiatives in malaysian automotive SMEs. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 16(6):1195–1203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0154-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mont O, Neuvonen A, Lähteenoja S (2014) Sustainable lifestyles 2050: stakeholder visions, emerging practices and future research. J Clean Prod 63:24–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaebernick H, Kara S, Sun M (2003) Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 19(6):461–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(03)00056-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosen MA, Kishawy HA (2012) Sustainable manufacturing and design: concepts, practices and needs. Sustainability 4(2):154–174.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su4020154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Despeisse M, Oates MR, Ball PD (2013) Sustainable manufacturing tactics and cross-functional factory modeling. J Clean Prod 42:31–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Banakar Z, Tahriri F (2010) Justification and classification of issues for the selection and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies, World Academy of Science. Eng Technol 4–05-24:283–290 http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:9RPF6sEsAXsJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhanot N, Rao PV, Deshmukh SG (2015) Enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing: results from a survey of researchers and industry professionals. Procedia CIRP 29:562–567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gunasekaran A, Spalanzani A (2012) Sustainability of manufacturing and services: investigations for research and applications. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):35–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amrina E, Yusof SM (2011) Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in automotive companies, In Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2011 IEEE International Conference (pp. 1093–1097). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6118084/
  12. 12.
    Jayal AD, Badurdeen F, Dillon OW, Jawahir IS (2010) Sustainable manufacturing: modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2(3):144–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng SC, Joung C, Li G (2010) Development overview of sustainable manufacturing metrics, In Proceedings of the 17th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Hefei, PRC. http://ws680.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=904931
  14. 14.
    Young P, Byrne G, Cotterell M (1997) Manufacturing and the environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13(7):488–493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01624609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark G, Kosoris J, Hong LN, Crul M (2009) Design for sustainability: current trends in sustainable product design and development. Sustainability 1(3):409–424.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su1030409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith L, Ball P (2012) Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modeling material, energy and waste flows. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):227–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tao F, Cheng J, Qi Q, Zhang M, Zhang H, Sui F (2018) Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9–12):3563–3576.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Despeisse M, Mbaye F, Ball PD, Levers A (2012) The emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices. Prod Plann Control 23(5):354–376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.555425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gandhi NS, Thanki SJ, Thakkar JJ (2018) Ranking of drivers for integrated lean-green manufacturing for Indian manufacturing SMEs. J Clean Prod 171:675–689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kibira D, Brundage MP, Feng S, Morris KC (2018) Procedure for selecting key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(1):011005.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bhanot N, Rao PV, Deshmukh SG (2017) An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing. J Clean Prod 142:4412–4439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chan FT, Li N, Chung SH, Saadat M (2017) Management of sustainable manufacturing systems-a review on mathematical problems. Int J Prod Res 55(4):1210–1225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1229067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu KJ, Tseng ML, Chiu AS, Lim MK (2017) Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility under uncertainty: a novel multi-criteria decision-making structure. Int J Prod Econ 190:96–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu KJ, Liao CJ, Tseng M, Chiu KKS (2016) Multi-attribute approach to sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty. Ind Manag Data Syst 116(4):777–800.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2015-0327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thanki SJ, Thakkar JJ (2016) Value–value load diagram: a graphical tool for lean–green performance assessment. Prod Plann Control 27(15):1280–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1220647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chun Y, Bidanda B (2013) Sustainable manufacturing and the role of the international journal of production research. Int J Prod Res 51(23–24):7448–7455.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.762135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vinodh S, Joy D (2012) Structural equation modeling of sustainable manufacturing practices. Clean Techn Environ Policy 14(1):79–84.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-011-0379-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garetti M, Taisch M (2012) Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges. Prod Plann Control 23(2–3):83–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.591619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zubir AFM, Habidin NF, Conding J, Jaya NASL, Hashim S (2012) The development of sustainable manufacturing practices and sustainable performance in Malaysian automotive industry. J Econ Sustain Dev 3(7):130–138 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nurul_Habidin/publication/260986002_The_Development_of_Sustainable_Manufacturing_Practices_and_Sustainable_Performance_in_Malaysian_Automotive_Industry/links/00b7d532e6494d1ebc000000.pdf Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li Y, Mathiyazhagan K (2018) Application of DEMATEL approach to identify the influential indicators towards sustainable supply chain adoption in the auto components manufacturing sector. J Clean Prod 172:2931–2941.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diana GC, Jabbour CJC, de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Kannan D (2017) Putting environmental technologies into the mainstream: adoption of environmental technologies by medium-sized manufacturing firms in Brazil. J Clean Prod 142:4011–4018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kang N, Zhao C, Li J, Horst JA (2016) A hierarchical structure of key performance indicators for operation management and continuous improvement in production systems. Int J Prod Res 54(21):6333–6350.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1136082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dewangan DK, Agrawal R, Sharma V (2015) Enablers for competitiveness of Indian manufacturing sector: an ISM-fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 189:416–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ghazilla RAR, Sakundarini N, Abdul-Rashid SH, Ayub NS, Olugu EU, Musa SN (2015) Drivers and barriers analysis for green manufacturing practices in Malaysian SMEs: a preliminary findings. Procedia CIRP 26:658–663.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Singh S, Olugu EU, Fallahpour A (2014) Fuzzy-based sustainable manufacturing assessment model for SMEs. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16(5):847–860.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0676-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rusinko C (2007) Green manufacturing: an evaluation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 54(3):445–454.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.900806 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ijomah WL, McMahon CA, Hammond GP, Newman ST (2007 October) Development of robust design-for-remanufacturing guidelines to further the aims of sustainable development. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4513–4536.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701450138 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shubham, Charan P, Murty LS (2018) Organizational adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in India: integrating institutional theory and corporate environmental responsibility. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 25(1):23–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1258373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Wamba SF, Papadopoulos T (2016) The impact of big data on world-class sustainable manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(1–4):631–645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7674-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Papadopoulos T, Childe SJ (2015) Green supply chain management enablers: mixed methods research. Sustainable Production and Consumption 4:72–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2015.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jovane F, Yoshikawa H, Alting L, Boër CR, Westkamper E, Williams D, Tseng M, Seliger G, Paci AM (2008) The incoming global technological and industrial revolution towards competitive sustainable manufacturing. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 57(2):641–659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Trianni A, Cagno E, Farné S (2016) Barriers, drivers and decision-making process for industrial energy efficiency: a broad study among manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. Appl Energy 162:1537–1551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mittal VK, Sangwan KS (2014) Prioritizing barriers to green manufacturing: environmental, social and economic perspectives. Procedia CIRP 17:559–564.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shi H, Peng SZ, Liu Y, Zhong P (2008) Barriers to the implementation of cleaner production in Chinese SMEs: government, industry and expert stakeholders’ perspectives. J Clean Prod 16(7):842–852.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gungor A, Gupta SM (1999) Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey. Comput Ind Eng 36(4):811–853.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00167-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shankar KM, Kannan D, Kumar PU (2017) Analyzing sustainable manufacturing practices–a case study in Indian context. J Clean Prod 164:1332–1343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jawahir IS, Dillon OW, Rouch KE, Joshi KJ, Venkatachalam A, Jaafar IH (2006) Total life-cycle considerations in product design for sustainability: a framework for comprehensive evaluation. In Proceedings of the 10th international research/expert conference, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 1–10). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Israd_Jaafar2/publication/285360999_Total_life-cycle_considerations_in_product_design_for_sustainability_A_framework_for_comprehensive_evaluation/links/5759237208aec913749f10e0.pdf
  48. 48.
    Sen P, Roy M, Pal P (2015) Exploring role of environmental proactivity in financial performance of manufacturing enterprises: a structural modelling approach. J Clean Prod 108:583–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Haapala KR, Zhao F, Camelio J, Sutherland JW, Skerlos SJ, Dornfeld DA, Jawahir IS, Clarens AF, Rickli JL (2013) A review of engineering research in sustainable manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 135(4):041013.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Walker PH, Seuring PS, Sarkis PJ, Klassen PR (2014) Sustainable operations management: recent trends and future directions. Int J Oper Prod Manag, 34(5).  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2013-0557
  51. 51.
    Chow WS, Chen Y (2012) Corporate sustainable development: testing a new scale based on the mainland Chinese context. J Bus Ethics 105(4):519–533.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0983-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Seliger G, Kim HJ, Kernbaum S, Zettl M (2008) Approaches to sustainable manufacturing. Int. J. Sustainable Manufacturing 1(1–2):58–77.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSM.2008.019227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Severo EA, de Guimarães JCF, Dorion ECH (2017) Cleaner production and environmental management as sustainable product innovation antecedents: a survey in Brazilian industries. J Clean Prod 142:87–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jenatabadi HS (2015) A tutorial for analyzing structural equation modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.03430. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1504/1504.03430.pdf
  55. 55.
    Suhr D (2006) The basics of structural equation modeling. Presented: Irvine, CA, SAS User Group of the Western Region of the United States (WUSS). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2e08/e8650acd8cf7ccef90331032f0c17fada062.pdf
  56. 56.
    de Carvalho J, Chima FO (2014) Applications of structural equation modeling in social sciences research. Am Int J Contemp Res Vol. 4 No. 1. http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_1_January_2014/2.pdf
  57. 57.
    Daire Hooper JC (2008) Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining modeling fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6(1):53–60. https://arrow.dit.ie/buschmanart/ Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hox JJ, Bechger TM (1998) An introduction to structural equation modelling. Family Science Review 11:354–373. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27706391_An_Introduction_to_Structural_Equation_Modeling Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Singh CD, Khamba JS (2016) Structural equation modelling for manufacturing competency and strategic success factors. In Int J Eng Res Afr (Vol. 19, pp. 138–155). Trans Tech Publications.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.19.138
  60. 60.
    Hussey DM, Eagan PD (2007) Using structural equation modeling to test environmental performance in small and medium-sized manufacturers: can SEM help SMEs? J Clean Prod 15(4):303–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Thirupathi RM, Vinodh S (2016) Application of interpretive structural modelling and structural equation modelling for analysis of sustainable manufacturing factors in Indian automotive component sector. Int J Prod Res 54:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1126372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mendes L, Machado J (2015) Employees’ skills, manufacturing flexibility and performance: a structural equation modelling applied to the automotive industry. Int J Prod Res 53(13):4087–4101.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.993772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Severo EA, de Guimarães JCF, Dorion ECH, Nodari CH (2015) Cleaner production, environmental sustainability and organizational performance: an empirical study in the Brazilian metal-mechanic industry. J Clean Prod 96:118–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Zeng SX, Meng XH, Yin HT, Tam CM, Sun L (2010) Impact of cleaner production on business performance. J Clean Prod 18(10):975–983.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hair FJ Jr, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser GV (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev 26(2):106–121.  https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Richter NF, Cepeda G, Roldán JL, Ringle CM (2015) European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Eur Manag J 33(1):1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40(3):879–891.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Aguinis H, Edwards JR, Bradley KJ (2017) Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organ Res Methods 20(4):665–685.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115627498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS (2007) Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 58:593–614.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nitzl C, Roldan JL, Cepeda G (2016) Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Ind Manag Data Syst 116(9):1849–1864.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Nitzl C (2016) The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: directions for future theory development. J Account Lit 37:19–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2016.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zhao X, Lynch JG Jr, Chen Q (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res 37(2):197–206.  https://doi.org/10.1086/651257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chi M, Zhao J, George JF (2015) Mediation and time-lag analyses of e-alignment and e-collaboration capabilities. Ind Manag Data Syst 115(6):1113–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2015-0016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Jiang Y, Zhao J (2014) Co-creating business value of information technology. Ind Manag Data Syst 114(1):53–69.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Methods 12(1):1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hong J, Zhang Y, Ding M (2018) Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. J Clean Prod 172:3508–3519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Mani V, Gunasekaran A, Delgado C (2018) Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: an emerging economy perspective. Int J Prod Econ 195:259–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Taylor KM, Vachon S (2017) Empirical research on sustainable supply chains: IJPR’s contribution and research avenues. Int J Prod Res 56:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402139 Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hami N, Muhamad MR, Ebrahim Z (2015) The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices and innovation performance on economic sustainability. Procedia CIRP 26:190–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Herrmann C, Schmidt C, Kurle D, Blume S, Thiede S (2014) Sustainability in manufacturing and factories of the future. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech. 1(4):283–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-014-0034-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Chen L, Olhager J, Tang O (2014) Manufacturing facility location and sustainability: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Prod Econ 149:154–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kumaraguru S, Rachuri S, Lechevalier D (2014) Faceted classification of manufacturing processes for sustainability performance evaluation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(9–12):1309–1320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6184-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Almeida CMVB, Agostinho F, Huisingh D, Giannetti BF (2017) Cleaner production towards a sustainable transition. J Clean Prod 142:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Shao J, Taisch M, Mier MO (2017) Influencing factors to facilitate sustainable consumption: from the experts’ viewpoints. J Clean Prod 142:203–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Joung CB, Carrell J, Sarkar P, Feng SC (2013) Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecol Indic 24:148–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Oliveira Neto GC, Leite RR, Shibao FY, Lucato WC (2016) Framework to overcome barriers in the implementation of cleaner production in small and medium-sized enterprises: multiple case studies in Brazil. J Clean Prod 142:50–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Shi L, Wu KJ, Tseng ML (2017) Improving corporate sustainable development by using an interdependent closed-loop hierarchical structure. Resour Conserv Recycl 119:24–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Habidin NF, Mohd Zubir AF, Mohd Fuzi N, Md Latip NA, Azman MNA (2017) Critical success factors of sustainable manufacturing practices in Malaysian automotive industry. Int J Sustain Eng 11:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2017.1293185 Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Seidel RHA, Shahbazpour M, Seidel MC (2007) Establishing sustainable manufacturing practices in SMEs. In 2nd International Conference on Sustainability Engineering and Science, Talking and Walking Sustainability http://www.smmeresearch.co.za/SMME%20Research%20General/Reports/Sustainable%20mfg%20practices%20in%20SMMES.pdf
  91. 91.
    Abdulrahman MD, Gunasekaran A, Subramanian N (2014) Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors. Int J Prod Econ 147:460–471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Cassettari L, Bendato I, Mosca M, Mosca R (2017) Energy resources intelligent management using on line real-time simulation: a decision support tool for sustainable manufacturing. Appl Energy 190:841–851.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hu AH, Hsu CW (2010) Critical factors for implementing green supply chain management practice: an empirical study of electrical and electronics industries in Taiwan. Manage Res Rev 33(6):586–608.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171011050208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Valase KG, Raut DN (2017) Reflective and formative constructs in the implementation of Sustainable Manufacturing with ‘SMEET’ framework, In Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), IEEE International Conference, 10–13 Dec. 2017 at Singapore. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290156
  95. 95.
    Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract 19(2):139–152.  https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Henseler J, Hubona GS, Pauline AR (2016) Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Ind Manag Data Syst 116(1):2–20.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Production Engineering Department, VJTIMumbai UniversityMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations