Application of compressed air in the online monitoring of surface roughness and grinding wheel wear when grinding Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy

  • Shaohui YinEmail author
  • DuyTrinh Nguyen
  • FengJun Chen
  • Qingchun Tang
  • Le Anh Duc


This work aimed to improve the surface quality and precision in machining process and speed up intelligent production. Hence, this work proposed a grinding process from a control perspective which provides a cognitive decision-making process. From this viewpoint, a new approach to measure the amount of grinding wheel wear and predict the surface roughness was designed by the authors on the basis of the compressed air measuring head and hybrid algorithms between fuzzy neural networks (i.e., ANFIS)—Gaussian regression function (i.e., GPR) and Taguchi empirical analysis. A series of experiments was conducted under different processing conditions. Results showed that the proposed method can measure the abrasive wear and predict the surface roughness accurately during Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy grinding. The proposed model can predict surface roughness values with an error rate of 0.31% and a confidence interval of 98%. This study laid the foundation for monitoring the grinding wheel wear and the surface roughness in real-life industrial environments.


Monitoring Grinding Grinding wheel wear Surface roughness Ti-6Al-4V alloy ANFIS-GPR hybrid algorithm 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51175167), and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Hunan Province (No. 2016TP1008).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Sun FJ, Qu SG, Pan YX, Li XQ, Li FL (2015) Effects of cutting parameters on dry machining Ti-6Al-4V alloy with ultra-hard tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(1–4):351–360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gariani S, Shyha I, Inam F, Huo D (2017) Experimental analysis of system parameters for minimum cutting fluid consumption when machining Ti-6Al-4V using a novel supply system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(5–8):2795–2809. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yi S, Li G, Ding S, Mo J (2017) Performance and mechanisms of graphene oxide suspended cutting fluid in the drilling of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process 29:182–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ezugwu EO, Batista Da Silva R, Falco Sales W, Rocha Machado A (2017) Overview of the machining of titanium alloys. In: Encyclopedia of sustainable technologies, pp 487–506. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koseki S, Inoue K, Sekiya K, Morito S, Ohba T, Usuki H (2017) Wear mechanisms of PVD-coated cutting tools during continuous turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Precis Eng 47:434–444. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Revankar GD, Shetty R, Rao SS, Gaitonde VN (2017) Wear resistance enhancement of titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) by ball burnishing process. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 6(1):13–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kacalak W, Lipiński D, Bałasz B, Rypina Ł, Tandecka K, Szafraniec F (2017) Performance evaluation of the grinding wheel with aggregates of grains in grinding of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1–4):301–314. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang J, Shimada K, Mizutani M, Kuriyagawa T (2018) Tool wear mechanism and its relation to material removal in ultrasonic machining. Wear 394-395:96–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wirtz C, Dehmer A, Trauth D, Mattfeld P, Klocke F (2018) Analysis of the grinding wheel wear in dependency of the cemented carbide specification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:747–754. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ding W, Dai C, Yu T, Xu J, Fu Y (2017) Grinding performance of textured monolayer CBN wheels: undeformed chip thickness nonuniformity modeling and ground surface topography prediction. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 122:66–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiang D, Zhou Z, Liu Z, Yao Y, Guo Z (2017) Abrasive wear of a single CBN grain in ultrasonic-assisted high-speed grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(1–4):67–75. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Novoselov Y, Bratan S, Bogutsky V (2016) Analysis of relation between grinding wheel wear and abrasive grains Wear. Procedia Engineering 150:809–814. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wegener K, Bleicher F, Krajnik P, Hoffmeister H-W, Brecher C (2017) Recent developments in grinding machines. CIRP Ann 66(2):779–802. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahrens M, Damm J, Dagen M, Denkena B, Ortmaier T (2017) Estimation of dynamic grinding wheel wear in plunge grinding. Procedia CIRP 58:422–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Darafon A, Warkentin A, Bauer R (2013) Characterization of grinding wheel topography using a white chromatic sensor. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 70:22–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taheri K, Gadow R (2017) Industrial compressed air system analysis: exergy and thermoeconomic analysis. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 18:10–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhuiyan MSH, Choudhury IA (2014) Review of sensor applications in tool condition monitoring in machining.539–569. doi:
  18. 18.
    Zhang G, Sun H (2017) Enabling a cutting tool iPSS based on tool condition monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9–12):3265–3274. Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D’Addona DM, Matarazzo D, Teti R, de Aguiar PR, Bianchi EC, Fornaro A (2017) Prediction of dressing in grinding operation via neural networks. Procedia CIRP 62:305–310. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Venkata Rao K, Murthy BSN, Mohan Rao N (2014) Prediction of cutting tool wear, surface roughness and vibration of work piece in boring of AISI 316 steel with artificial neural network. Measurement 51:63–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rizal M, Ghani JA, Nuawi MZ, Haron CHC (2013) Online tool wear prediction system in the turning process using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput 13(4):1960–1968. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quiza R, Figueira L, Paulo Davim J (2007) Comparing statistical models and artificial neural networks on predicting the tool wear in hard machining D2 AISI steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(7–8):641–648. Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen D-D, Lin YC, Zhou Y, Chen M-S, Wen D-X (2017) Dislocation substructures evolution and an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system model for constitutive behavior of a Ni-based superalloy during hot deformation. J Alloys Compd 708:938–946. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuo RJ, PHC (1999) Multi-sensor integration for on-line tool wear estimation through radial basis function networks and fuzzy neural network. Neural Networks 12(12):355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Gajate RH, R.d. Toro, P. Vega, A. Bustillo (2010) Tool wear monitoring using neuro-fuzzy techniques: a comparative study in a turning process. J Intell Manuf 1 (14).
  26. 26.
    Alonso FJ, Salgado DR (2008) Analysis of the structure of vibration signals for tool wear detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(3):735–748. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kong DD, Chen YJ, Li N, Tan SL (2017) Tool wear monitoring based on kernel principal component analysis and v-support vector regression. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:175–190.
  28. 28.
    D. Wu CJ JT, R.X. Gao, S. Kumara. (2017) A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: tool wear prediction using random forests. Manuf 139(7):071018−071024.
  29. 29.
    Hasselmo ME, Mozer MC, Touretzky DS (1996) Gaussian Processes for Regression. MIT Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang B, Chen T (2015) Gaussian process regression with multiple response variables. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 142:159–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chauhan R, Singh T, Kumar N, Patnaik A, Thakur NS (2017) Experimental investigation and optimization of impinging jet solar thermal collector by Taguchi method. Appl Therm Eng 116:100–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kong X, Yang L, Zhang H, Chi G, Wang Y (2016) Optimization of surface roughness in laser-assisted machining of metal matrix composites using Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(1–4):529–542. Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shrivastava PK, Pandey AK (2018) Geometrical quality evaluation in laser cutting of Inconel-718 sheet by using Taguchi based regression analysis and particle swarm optimization. Infrared Phys Technol 89:369–380. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gholami MH, Azizi MR (2014) Constrained grinding optimization for time, cost, and surface roughness using NSGA-II. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(5–8):981–988. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Malkin S (2008) In: Edition S (ed) Grinding technology - theory and applications of machining with abrasives. Industrial press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Alexandre FA, Lopes WN, Lofrano Dotto FR, Ferreira FI, Aguiar PR, Bianchi EC, Lopes JC (2018) Tool condition monitoring of aluminum oxide grinding wheel using AE and fuzzy model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.
  37. 37.
    Young H-T, Chen D-J (2005) Online dressing of profile grinding wheels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27(9–10):883–888. Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wager JG (1967) Surface effects in pneumatic gauging. International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research 7(1):1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Koshy P, Grandy D, Klocke F (2011) Pneumatic non-contact topography characterization of finish-ground surfaces using multivariate projection methods. Precis Eng 35(2):282–288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tönshoff HK II (2001) Sensors in manufacturing, vol 1. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ivanyshyn Yaman O, Kress R (2017) Nonlinear integral equations for Bernoulli’s free boundary value problem in three dimensions. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 74(11):2784–2791. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Järveläinen M, Kaleva A, Kaitajärvi A, Laakso J, Kanerva U, Levänen E (2016) Compression curve analysis and compressive strength measurement of brittle granule beds in lieu of individual granule measurements. Particuology 29:60–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Li X, Zhou R, Yao W, Fan X (2017) Flow characteristic of highly underexpanded jets from various nozzle geometries. Appl Therm Eng 125:240–253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nehler T (2018) Linking energy efficiency measures in industrial compressed air systems with non-energy benefits—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 89:72–87. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guo H, Xu Y, Chen H, Zhou X (2016) Thermodynamic characteristics of a novel supercritical compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manag 115:167–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Grandy D, Koshy P, Klocke F (2009) Pneumatic non-contact roughness assessment of moving surfaces. CIRP Ann 58(1):515–518. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Balaji M, Murthy BSN, Rao NM (2016) Optimization of cutting parameters in drilling of AISI 304 stainless steel using Taguchi and ANOVA. Procedia Technology 25:1106–1113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rathee P, Kamboj A, Sidhu S (2016) Optimization and development of Nisoldipine nano-bioenhancers by novel orthogonal array (L27 array). Int J Biol Macromol 86:556–561. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaohui Yin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • DuyTrinh Nguyen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • FengJun Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qingchun Tang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Le Anh Duc
    • 5
  1. 1.National Engineering Research Centre for High Efficiency GrindingHunan UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Centre for Intelligent Laser ManufacturingHunan UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of Mechanical and Vehicle EngineeringHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  4. 4.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringHanoi University of IndustryHanoiVietnam
  5. 5.Faculty of Information TechnologyHanoi University of IndustryHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations