Advertisement

Changes of cutting performance under different workpiece removal volume during normal speed and high speed milling of compacted graphite iron

  • Rui Su
  • Chuanzhen HuangEmail author
  • Longhua Xu
  • Bin Zou
  • Hanlian Liu
  • Yue Liu
  • Chengwu Li
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Compacted graphite iron (CGI) possesses good mechanical properties and thermal properties in comparison to gray cast iron (GCI) and spherical graphite spheroidal cast iron (SGI). However, the machinability of CGI is poor, and the cutting tool wear is very fast during the machining of CGI, which can lead to the changes of the cutting force and the machined surface integrity. The present study investigates the influence of workpiece material removal volume (Q) on the cutting tool wear, cutting force, machined surface roughness, and morphology under normal (V = 134 m/min) and high cutting speed process (V = 800 m/min). The result shows that Q had a more obvious effect on the value of cutting forces when the cutting speed was 800/min, while the effect was slight when the cutting speed was 134 m/min. However, the effect of Q on the direction of the resultant cutting force was small, and the direction of the resultant cutting force was more likely to be affected by the increase of cutting speed. The effect of Q on the machined surface roughness Ra and Rz was different between normal and high cutting speed process. Dark and bright areas can be found on the machined surfaces obtained under the normal speed cutting process, and the ratio of dark area to total area P can be used as a parameter to measure the machined surface quality. The flank wear of the cutting tool used for normal speed cutting process can be divided into brighter cemented carbide region and darker coating wear region due to the low wear rate, while only the brighter cemented carbide wear region was found on the tool used for high cutting speed process. Cracks could be found on the cutting tool used for both normal cutting speed process and high cutting speed process. However, the crack propagation appeared faster under high cutting speed process, chipping was formed near the crack. The depth and width of the crater wear under normal cutting speed process were larger than that under high cutting speed process.

Keywords

Compacted graphite iron Cutting force Surface roughness Surface morphology Crater wear Crack 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

This work is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51675312 and 51675313).

References

  1. 1.
    Dawson S, SinterCast (2009) Compacted graphite iron-a material solution for modern diesel engine cylinder blocks and heads. China Foundry 6(3):241–246Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Silva MBD, Naves VTG, Melo JDBD, Andrade CLFD, Guesser WL (2011) Analysis of wear of cemented carbide cutting tools during milling operation of gray iron and compacted graphite iron. Wear 271(9):2426–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abele E, Sahm A, Schulz H (2002) Wear mechanism when machining compacted graphite iron. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 51(1):53–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gabaldo S, Diniz AE, Andrade CLF, Guesser WL (2010) Performance of carbide and ceramic tools in the milling of compact graphite iron - CGI. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 32(5):511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dawson S, Hollinger I, Robbins M, Daeth J, Reuter U, Schulz H (2001) The effect of metallurgical variables on the machinability of compacted graphite iron. In: Emerging casting processes and materials for the automotive industry (Part A&B). Detroit, MI, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo Y, Stalbaum T, Mann J, Yeung H, Chandrasekar S (2013) Modulation-assisted high speed machining of compacted graphite iron (CGI). J Manuf Process 15(4):426–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skvarenina S, Shin YC (2006) Laser-assisted machining of compacted graphite iron. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(1):7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suhaimi MA, Park KH, Yang GD, Sharif S, Kim DW (2018) Effect of cryogenic high-speed milling of compacted graphite iron using indirect spray system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen M, Jiang L, Guo G, An Q (2011) Experimental and FEM study of coated and uncoated tools used for dry milling of compacted graphite cast iron. Trans Tianjin Univ 17(4):235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu ZQ, Ai X, Zhang H, Wang ZT, Wan Y (2002) Wear patterns and mechanisms of cutting tools in high speed face milling. J Mater Process Technol 129(1):222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Altintas Y, Ber AA (2012) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and cnc design. Ind Robot 31(1):B84Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Huang CZ, Song WG (2003) The effect of tool flank wear on the orthogonal cutting process and its practical implications. J Mater Process Technol 142(2):338–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2016) Cutting force modeling considering tool wear effect during turning of hardened aisi 4340 alloy steel using multi-layer ticn/al 2 o 3 /tin-coated carbide tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):1749–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tang ZT, Liu ZQ, Pan YZ, Wan Y, Ai X (2009) The influence of tool flank wear on residual stresses induced by milling aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol 209(9):4502–4508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang H, Chen Z, Zhou ZT (2015) Influence of cutting speed and tool wear on the surface integrity of the titanium alloy ti-1023 during milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5–8):1113–1126Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liang X, Liu Z (2017) Experimental investigations on effects of tool flank wear on surface integrity during orthogonal dry cutting of ti-6al-4v. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):1617–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levy EK, Tsai CL, Groover MP (1976) Analytical investigation of the effect of tool wear on the temperature variations in a metal cutting tool. J Eng Ind 98(1):251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cui D, Zhang D, Wu B, Luo M (2017) An investigation of tool temperature in end milling considering the flank wear effect. Int J Mech Sci 131–132:613–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liang SY, Kwon YK, Chiou RY (2004) Modelling the effect of flank wear on machining thrust stability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23(11–12):857–864Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    González H, Calleja A, Pereira O, Ortega N, Lacalle LNLD, Barton M (2018) Super abrasive machining of integral rotary components using grinding flank tools. Metals 8(1):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Su R, Huang CZ, Zou B, Liu GL, Liu ZQ, Liu Y, Li CW (2018) Study on cutting burr and tool failure during high-speed milling of compacted graphite iron by the coated carbide tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 9:1–11Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohammed WM, Ng E, Elbestawi MA (2012) Modeling the effect of compacted graphite iron microstructure on cutting forces and tool wear. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 5(2):87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rui Su
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chuanzhen Huang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Longhua Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bin Zou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hanlian Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yue Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chengwu Li
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Jet Engineering Technologies (CaJET), School of Mechanical EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of High-efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education, Ministry of EducationShandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Jinan Power Co. Ltd. of China National Heavy Duty Truck Group Co., Ltd.JinanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations