Improving deposition efficiency in cold spraying chromium coatings by powder annealing

  • Hwasung Yeom
  • Tyler Dabney
  • Greg Johnson
  • Benjamin Maier
  • Mia Lenling
  • Kumar SridharanEmail author


Annealing of attrition-milled, electrolytically produced chromium powder has been investigated to improve cold spray coating deposition efficiency of pure chromium on Zr-alloy substrate for light water reactors with the goal of enhancing high-temperature oxidation resistance. The annealing heat treatment at 800 °C for 5 h induced microstructural transitions in the powder such as the development of equiaxed grains and strain relaxation, both associated with a measured decrease in nano-hardness. Deposition efficiency of the annealed powder was about three times more than the as-received electrolytic Cr powder. In addition, the utilization of the annealed powder reduced substrate deformation effects. A qualitative explanation of the effects powder microstructure on the cold spray deposition process in terms of the resulting coating microstructures and deposition efficiencies has been introduced. Finally, high-temperature exposure tests indicated that oxidation resistance of these Cr coatings was comparable to that previously reported for those produced using gas-atomized Cr powder. This study suggests that annealing of electrolytic Cr powder is a practical and economically favorable pathway to produce oxidation-resistant cold spray Cr coatings. More generally, use of the widely available electrolytic and mechanically milled powder vastly opens scope of cold spray deposition process, where atomized powders may not be either available or challenging to produce.


Cold spray process Electrolytic Cr powder Powder annealing Deposition efficiency Oxidation resistance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors wish to acknowledge the support from Westinghouse Electric Company. The authors also thank Solar Atmospheres, Inc., Souderton, PA (Dr. Virginia Osterman) for performing the annealing of the chromium powders. This work is sponsored by the US Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, under grant number DE-NE0008222.


  1. 1.
    Almotairi A, Warkentin A, Farhat Z (2016) Mechanical damage of hard chromium coatings on 416 stainless steel. Eng Fail Anal 66:130–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim HG, Kim IH, Il JY et al (2015) Adhesion property and high-temperature oxidation behavior of Cr-coated Zircaloy-4 cladding tube prepared by 3D laser coating. J Nucl Mater 465:531–539. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang Y, Zhou W, Wen Q, Ruan X, Luo F, Bai G, Qing Y, Zhu D, Huang Z, Zhang Y, Liu T, Li R (2018) Behavior of plasma sprayed Cr coatings and FeCrAl coatings on Zr fuel cladding under loss-of-coolant accident conditions. Surf Coat Technol 344:141–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnal BB (2018) Atomic-scale interface structure of a Cr-coated Zircaloy-4 material. J Mater Sci 53:9879–9895. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park DJ, Kim HG, Il JY et al (2016) Behavior of an improved Zr fuel cladding with oxidation resistant coating under loss-of-coolant accident conditions. J Nucl Mater 482:75–82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maier B, Yeom H, Johnson G, Dabney T, Walters J, Romero J, Shah H, Xu P, Sridharan K (2018) Development of cold spray coatings for accident-tolerant fuel cladding in light water reactors. JOM 70:198–202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lahoda E, Xu P, Karoutas Z, et al (2018) Cold spray chromium coating for nuclear fuel rods. US Patent:US 2018 / 0025793 A1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Assadi H, Gärtner F, Stoltenhoff T, Kreye H (2003) Bonding mechanism in cold gas spraying. Acta Mater 51:4379–4394. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ajdelsztajn L, Jodoin B, Kim GE, Schoenung JM (2005) Cold spray deposition of nanocrystalline aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 36A:657–666. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cavaliere P (2018) Cold-spray coatings recent trends and future perspectives. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Romero JE, Byers WA, Wang G, et al (2017) Simulated severe accident testing for evaluation of accident tolerant fuel. 2017 Water react. Fuel Perform MeetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shah H, Romero J, Xu P et al (2017) Development of surface coatings for enhanced accident tolerant fuel. 2017 Water react. Fuel Perform MeetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee C, Kim J (2015) Microstructure of kinetic spray coatings: a review. J Therm Spray Technol 24:592–610. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sansoucy E, Marcoux P, Ajdelsztajn L, Jodoin B (2008) Properties of SiC-reinforced aluminum alloy coatings produced by the cold gas dynamic spraying process. Surf Coat Technol 202:3988–3996. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez R, Jodoin B (2017) Effect of particle morphology on cold spray deposition of chromium carbide-nickel chromium cermet powders. J Therm Spray Technol 26:1356–1380. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolfe DE, Eden TJ, Potter JK, Jaroh AP (2006) Investigation and characterization of Cr3C2-based wear-resistant coatings applied by the cold spray process. J Therm Spray Technol 15:400–412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Mangour B, Mongrain R, Irissou E, Yue S (2013) Improving the strength and corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel for biomedical applications using cold spray. Surf Coat Technol 216:297–307. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith WH, Seybolt AU (1956) Ductile chromium. J Electrochem Soc 103:347. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    (1990) Properties of pure metals: ASM handbook, Vol.2. ASM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sova A, Grigoriev S, Okunkova A, Smurov I (2013) Potential of cold gas dynamic spray as additive manufacturing technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:2269–2278. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yeom H, Maier BR, Johnson G, Sridharan K (2018) Cold spray coatings for accident tolerant Zr-alloy cladding in light water reactors. In: Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. American Nuclear Society, Philadelphia, PA USA, pp 1576–1579Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Allen RF (1999) Standard test methods for determining average grain size (F112).
  23. 23.
    Choi IC, Brandl C, Schwaiger R (2017) Thermally activated dislocation plasticity in body-centered cubic chromium studied by high-temperature nanoindentation. Acta Mater 140:107–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maier V, Hohenwarter A, Pippan R, Kiener D (2015) Thermally activated deformation processes in body-centered cubic Cr—how microstructure influences strain-rate sensitivity. Scr Mater 106:42–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    King PC, Zahiri SH, Jahedi M (2009) Microstructural refinement within a cold-sprayed copper particle. Metall Mater Trans A 40:2115–2123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luo XT, Li CX, Shang FL, Yang GJ, Wang YY, Li CJ (2014) High velocity impact induced microstructure evolution during deposition of cold spray coatings: a review. Surf Coat Technol 254:11–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Furukawa M, Horita Z, Nemoto M, Valiev RZ, Langdon TG (1996) Microhardness measurements and the hall-petch relationship in an Al-Mg alloy with submicrometer grain size. Acta Mater 44:4619–4629. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brittain CP, Armstrong RW, Smith GC (1985) Hall-petch dependence for ultrafine grain size electrodeposited chromium. Scr Metall 19:89–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yuuji K, Setsuo T (1995) Microstructural changes during annealing of work-hardened mechanically milled metallic powders (overview). Mater Trans JIM 36:289–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Al-Mangour B, Vo P, Mongrain R et al (2014) Effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of stainless steel 316L coatings produced by cold spray for biomedical applications. J Therm Spray Technol 23:641–652. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li CJ, Li WY, Wang YY (2005) Formation of metastable phases in cold-sprayed soft metallic deposit. Surf Coat Technol 198:469–473. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang P, Li SX, Zhang ZF (2011) General relationship between strength and hardness. Mater Sci Eng A 529:62–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen C, Xie Y, Huang R, Deng S, Ren Z, Liao H (2018) On the role of oxide film’s cleaning effect into the metallurgical bonding during cold spray. Mater Lett 210:199–202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Li WY, Zhang C, Wang HT, Guo XP, Liao HL, Li CJ, Coddet C (2007) Significant influences of metal reactivity and oxide films at particle surfaces on coating microstructure in cold spraying. Appl Surf Sci 253:3557–3562. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hwasung Yeom
    • 1
  • Tyler Dabney
    • 1
  • Greg Johnson
    • 2
  • Benjamin Maier
    • 2
  • Mia Lenling
    • 2
  • Kumar Sridharan
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Engineering PhysicsUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science & EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations