Research on material removal model and processing parameters of cluster magnetorheological finishing with dynamic magnetic fields
- 36 Downloads
Based on fluid mechanics and Preston equation, the influences of various technological parameters (including rotational speeds of workpieces, magnetic poles, and polishing disk and the machining gap) on polishing pressure on workpiece surfaces were investigated. On this basis, a material removal rate (MRR) model of cluster magnetorheological finishing (CMRF) with dynamic magnetic fields was established. Moreover, three pieces of single-crystal silicon substrates were subjected to synchronous polishing on the CMRF devices with dynamic magnetic fields in order to analyze the influence of different technological parameters on the MRR. It is showed that the theoretical simulation results favorably agree with the experimental results. The single-crystal silicon substrates with the initial surface roughness (Ra) of 0.48 μm were polished for 5 h on the optimal technological conditions: the machining gap and the eccentricity of magnetic poles are 0.9 mm and 6 mm, respectively; the workpieces are oscillated in Y direction for 40 mm at the oscillation speed of 600 mm/min; the rotational speeds of the polishing disk, magnetic poles, and workpieces are 50 r/min, 90 r/min, and 350 r/min, respectively. In this way, the super-smooth uniform surfaces with the roughness of Ra 2.4 nm were acquired.
KeywordsDynamic magnetic field Cluster magnetorheological finishing Plane polishing Material removal rate model Polishing pressure Single-crystal silicon substrate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. Xiaowei Zhang, a visiting fellow of Nagoya University in the final language editing of this paper.
This study received funding from the Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Project (No. 2016A010102014) and the Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation Project (No. 2015A030311044).
- 4.Sato T, Wu Y, Lin W et al (2009) Study on magnetic compound fluid (MCF) polishing process using fluctuating magnetic field(flow behaviour and applications of complex fluids characterized by non-Newtonian viscosity or functionality). Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng B 75:1007–1012. https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaib.75.753_1007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Yan Q, Yan J, Lu J (2010) Ultra smooth planarization polishing technique based on the cluster magnetorheological effect. Adv Mater Res 135:18–23. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.135.18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Shorey A, Gregg L, Romanofsky H (1999) Study of material removal during magnetorheological finishing. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 3782. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.369176
- 18.Zhang F, Zhang X, Yu J, Wang Q, Guo P (2000) Foundation of mathematics model of magnetorheological finishing. Opt Technol 26:190–192. https://doi.org/10.13741/j.cnki.11-1879/o4.2000.02.032 Google Scholar
- 20.Pan J, Yan Q, Gao W, Yu P. (2018) A self-sharpening polishing device with magnetorheological flexible polishing pad formed by dynamic magnetic field and polishing method thereof. Patent, US20180021910A1Google Scholar
- 21.Sato T, Wu Y, Lin W, Shimada K (2009) Study of three-dimensional polishing using magnetic compound fluid (MCF). Adv Mater Res 76-78:288–293. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.76-78.288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Xiang W, Ling F (2013) Review of coupled research for mechanical dynamics and fluid mechanics of reciprocating compressor. Appl Mech Mater 327:227–232. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.327.227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar