Advertisement

A unified index for proactive shop floor control

  • Minakshi KumariEmail author
  • Makarand S. Kulkarni
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Unpredictability of performance under the influence of various uncertainties makes decision-making a complex task on the shop floor. A measure which can indicate the expected shop floor scenario over a projected timeline can be an effective hands-on tool for a shop floor decision maker. The current work proposes three measures, namely complexity, penalty, and desirability of a shop floor situation and aggregates them into a single unified index (UI). Given an indicative list of uncertainties and the prevailing shop floor situation, a periodic simulation approach is presented to observe the changes in the UI. The extent of change in the UI, both in terms of magnitude and direction, is used to identify those significant environmental variables which need intervention. Developing a proactive control measure from the perspective of a decision maker on the shop floor, demonstration of CRITIC (Criteria Importance through Intercriteria Correlation)-based automated decision-making mechanism in a manufacturing setup and a simulation approach to aid the decision-making process are the highlights of the current work. The results reported are with reference to a high-pressure die casting unit.

Keywords

CRITIC (Criteria Importance through Intercriteria Correlation) Manufacturing complexity Multi-criteria decision-making Simulation Unified index 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Varela MLR, Ribeiro RA (2014) In: Zadeh LA, Abbasov AM, Yager RR, Shahbazova SN, Reformat MZ (eds) Distributed manufacturing scheduling based on a dynamic multi-criteria decision model BT - recent developments and new directions in soft computing. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 81–93Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method. Comput Oper Res 22(7):763–770zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mardani A, Jusoh A, Nor KMD, Khalifah Z, Zakwan N, Valipour A (2015) Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ Res Istraživanja 28(1):516–571Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Kildienė S (2014) State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20(1):165–179Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Velasquez M, Hester PT (2013) An analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Int J Oper Res 10(2):56–66MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Toloie-Eshlaghy A, Homayonfar M (2011) MCDM methodologies and applications: a literature review from 1999 to 2009. Res J Int Stud 21:86–137Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ertugrul Karsak E, Sebnem Ahiska S (2008) Improved common weight MCDM model for technology selection. Int J Prod Res 46(24):6933–6944Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deng H, Yeh C-H, Willis RJ (2000) Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput Oper Res 27(10):963–973zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yeh C-H, Willis RJ, Deng H, Pan H (1999) Task oriented weighting in multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 119(1):130–146zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu SJ, Zhu X, Wang H, Koren Y (2008) CIRP annals - manufacturing technology product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57:45–48Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang Y-M, Luo Y (2010) Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision-making. Math Comput Model 51(1):1–12MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Choo EU, Schoner B, Wedley WC (1999) Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision-making. Comput Ind Eng 37(3):527–541Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan FTS, Prakash A (2012) Maintenance policy selection in manufacturing firms using the fuzzy MCDM approach. Int J Prod Res 50(23):7044–7056Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gurumurthy A, Kodali R (2008) A multi-criteria decision-making model for the justification of lean manufacturing systems. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 3(2):100–118Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Toni AF, Nardini A, Nonino F, Zanutto, G (2005) Complexity measures in manufacturing systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems, Paris, France, 14–18 November 2005Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fredendall LD, Gabriel TJ (2003) Manufacturing complexity: a quantitative measure. In: Proc. POMS Conference, p. 2Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Calinescu A, Efstathiou J, Schirn J, Bermejo J (1998) Applying and assessing two methods for measuring complexity in manufacturing. J Oper Res Soc 49(7):723–733zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuzgunkaya O, Elmaraghy HA (2006) Assessing the structural complexity of manufacturing systems configurations. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 18:145–171zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Efthymiou K, Pagoropoulos A, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2014) Manufacturing systems complexity: an assessment of manufacturing performance indicators unpredictability. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 7(4):324–334Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Efthymiou K, Pagoropoulos A, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2012) Manufacturing Systems Complexity Review : Challenges and Outlook. Procedia CIRP 3:644–649Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elmaraghy W, Elmaraghy H, Tomiyama T, Monostori L (2012) Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):793–814Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mourtzis D, Vlachou K, Fotia S (2017) Quantification of Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Complexity based on Information Theory. IESM Conference, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2017Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papakostas N, Efthymiou K, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2009) Modelling the complexity of manufacturing systems using nonlinear dynamics approaches. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58:437–440Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frizelle G, Woodcock E (1995) Measuring complexity as an aid to developing operational strategy. Int J Oper Prod Manag 15(5):26–39Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu Y, Frizelle G, Efstathiou J (2007) A study on the cost of operational complexity in customer–supplier systems. Int J Prod Econ 106(1):217–229Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deshmukh AV, Talavage JJ, Barash MM (1998) Complexity in manufacturing systems , part 1 : analysis of static complexity. In: IIE Trans, vol 30, pp 645–655Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Deshmukh AV, Talavage JJ, Barash MM (1992) Characteristics of part mix complexity measure for manufacturing systems. In: Systems, man and cybernetics. IEEE International Conference pp. 1384–1389Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumari M, Kulkarni MS (2016) A complexity based look-ahead mechanism for shop-floor decision-making. Procedia CIRP 41:63–68Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    van der Zee DJ (2006) Modeling decision-making and control in manufacturing simulation. Int J Prod Econ 100(1):155–167Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thiede S, Seow Y, Andersson J, Johansson B (2013) Environmental aspects in manufacturing system modelling and simulation—state of the art and research perspectives. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 6(1):78–87Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mařík V, Strasser T, Zoitl A (eds) (2009) Holonic and multi-agent systems for manufacturing, vol 5696. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mourtzis D, Doukas M, Bernidaki D (2014) Simulation in manufacturing: review and challenges. Procedia CIRP 25:213–229Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jahangirian M, Eldabi T, Naseer A, Stergioulas LK, Young T (2010) Simulation in manufacturing and business: a review. Eur J Oper Res 203(1):1–13Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Negahban A, Smith JS (2014) Simulation for manufacturing system design and operation: literature review and analysis. J Manuf Syst 33(2):241–261Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moon YB (2017) Simulation modelling for sustainability: a review of the literature. Int J Sustain Eng 10(1):2–19Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bandinelli R, Rapaccini M, Tucci M, Visintin F (2006) Using simulation for supply chain analysis: reviewing and proposing distributed simulation frameworks. Prod Plan Control 17(2):167–175Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weigert G, Horn S, Werner S (2006) Optimization of manufacturing processes by distributed simulation. Int J Prod Res 44(18–19):3677–3692zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smart J, Calinescu A, Huatuco LH (2013) Extending the information-theoretic measures of the dynamic complexity of manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 51(2):362–379Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations