Advertisement

Tool wear characterization in high-speed milling of titanium metal matrix composites

  • Saeid Kamalizadeh
  • Seyed Ali NiknamEmail author
  • Alireza Asgari
  • Marek Balazinski
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Titanium metal matrix composites (Ti-MMCs) have been successfully incorporated into a vast number of products within various industrial sectors. Despite excellent mechanical and physical features, due to the presence of hard and abrasive ceramic particles in metal matrices of Ti-MMCs, various issues have been emerged regarding machining and machinability of Ti-MMCs. Among critical machinability attributes, tool/insert wear and surface quality, in principle average surface roughness, Ra, are the principal critical attributes. This study plans to present an experimental analysis of wear characterization of polycrystalline diamond (PCD) and carbide inserts during high-speed milling of Ti-MMCs. The main wear modes observed were adhesion, abrasion, and diffusion. Oxidation was also observed at under those cutting conditions with elevated temperature. Regardless of the insert used, edge chipping was also observed in milling tests under various levels of cutting. It was observed that cutting speed and depth of cut are the major cutting parameters affecting wear rate in carbide X500 and PCD inserts. Meanwhile, surface roughness Ra was not affected by the cutting parameters used when using PCD insert. Promising tool wear rates also were recorded under low levels of cutting speed and high levels of feed rate when using carbide insert X500.

Keywords

Tool wear Ti-MMC Insert PCD Carbide Milling Hard-to-cut materials 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

This study received financial support from the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies (FQRNT) and NSERC Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology (CANRIMT).

References

  1. 1.
    Nicholls CJ, Boswell B, Davies IJ, Islam MN (2017) Review of machining metal matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(9–12):2429–2441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klocke F, Krieg T (1999) Coated tools for metal cutting–features and applications. CIRP Ann 48(2):515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burnett P, Rickerby D (1987) Assessment of coating hardness. Surf Eng 3(1):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Musil J (2000) Hard and superhard nanocomposite coatings. Surf Coat Technol 125(1–3):322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asgari A (2015) Cutting conditions optimisation of titanium metal matrix composites in turning and face milling. École Polytechnique de MontréalGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu D, Zhang X, Ding H (2013) Tool wear characteristics in machining of nickel-based superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 64:60–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konig W (1978) Applied research on the machinability of titanium and its alloys. In: Proc. AGARD Conf. Advanced Fabrication Processes, Florence, p 1979Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davim JP (2012) Tribology in manufacturing technology. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jin L, Riahi A, Farokhzadeh K, Edrisy A (2014) Investigation on interfacial adhesion of Ti–6Al–4V/nitride coatings. Surf Coat Technol 260:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joshi S (2012) Machining metal matrix composites using diamond tools. In: Machining Technology for Composite Materials. Elsevier, pp 426–459Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muthukrishnan N, Murugan M, Rao KP (2008) Machinability issues in turning of Al-SiC (10p) metal matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(3–4):211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Said M, Yusoff M, Che Hassan C, Selamat MA, Shukur J, Ghani JA (2014) Tool wear in machining AlSi/AlN metal matrix composite 10 wt% reinforcement using uncoated cutting tool. Appl Mech Mater 465:973–977 Trans Tech PublGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaitonde V, Karnik S, Davim JP (2012) Computational methods and optimization in machining of metal matrix composites. In: Machining of metal matrix composites. Springer, pp 143–162Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pramanik A, Zhang L, Arsecularatne J (2008) Machining of metal matrix composites: effect of ceramic particles on residual stress, surface roughness and chip formation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(15):1613–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Srivastava P, Dubey S (2015) Experimental investigations to study tool wear during turning of alumina reinforced aluminium composite. Special Issue on Advancement in Mechanical Engineering, p 107Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bansal P, Upadhyay L (2013) Experimental investigations to study tool wear during turning of alumina reinforced aluminium composite. Procedia Eng 51:818–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Preetham R, Morris J, Rajasekaran K (2014) Optimization of machining hybrid metal matrix composites using desirability analysis. Adv Mater Res 875:1412–1420 Trans Tech PublCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kishore DSC, Rao KP, Mahamani A (2014) Investigation of cutting force, surface roughness and flank wear in turning of in-situ Al6061-TiC metal matrix composite. Procedia Mater Sci 6:1040–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seeman M, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R, Velayudham A (2010) Study on tool wear and surface roughness in machining of particulate aluminum metal matrix composite-response surface methodology approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(5–8):613–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    da Silva RB, Machado ÁR, Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Sales WF (2013) Tool life and wear mechanisms in high speed machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy with PCD tools under various coolant pressures. J Mater Process Technol 213(8):1459–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boswell B, Islam MN, Davies IJ, Pramanik A (2017) Effect of machining parameters on the surface finish of a metal matrix composite under dry cutting conditions. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231(6):913–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaarmuhilan K, Karthika S, Muthukrishnan N (2012) Performance evaluation of PCD 1300 and 1500 grade inserts on turning A356 alloy with 20% reinforcement of SiC particles. Appl Mech Mater 110:1855–1861 Trans Tech PublGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bejjani R, Balazinski M, Attia H, Plamondon P, L’Éspérance G (2016) Chip formation and microstructure evolution in the adiabatic shear band when machining titanium metal matrix composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 109:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abernethy R, Benedict R, Dowdell R (1985) ASME measurement uncertainty. J Fluids Eng 107(2):161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aramesh M, Attia HM, Kishawy HA, Balazinski M (2017) Observation of a unique wear morphology of cBN inserts during machining of titanium metal matrix composites (Ti-MMCs); leading to new insights into their machinability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1–4):519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kamali Zadeh S (2016) Initial tool wear mechanisms in turning of titanium metal matrix composites. École Polytechnique de MontréalGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li A, Zhao J, Zhou Y, Chen X, Wang D (2012) Experimental investigation on chip morphologies in high-speed dry milling of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9–12):933–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Poulachon G, Moisan AL (2000) Hard turning: chip formation mechanisms and metallurgical aspects. J Manuf Sci Eng 122(3):406–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang Q, Wu Y, Liu D, Chen L, Lou D, Zhai Z, Liu Z (2016) Characteristics of serrated chip formation in high-speed machining of metallic materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(5–8):1201–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ekinovic S, Dolinsek S, Jawahir I (2004) Some observations of the chip formation process and the white layer formation in high speed milling of hardened steel. Mach Sci Technol 8(2):327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhu Z, Sun J, Li J, Huang P (2016) Investigation on the influence of tool wear upon chip morphology in end milling titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):1477–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saeid Kamalizadeh
    • 1
  • Seyed Ali Niknam
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alireza Asgari
    • 1
  • Marek Balazinski
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentPolytechnique MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Sustainable Manufacturing Systems Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations