Advertisement

Recognition and identification the position and location of tooth saw butt joint shape

  • Hairol Nizam Mohd Shah
  • Marizan Sulaiman
  • Ahmad Zaki Shukor
  • Zalina Kamis
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

This research presents a new approach vision-based to recognize and locate the tooth saw joint position in butt welding joint. The research came out because some joints are quite difficult to recognize the butt welding position and location especially in a corner side or which one belongs to the tooth saw shapes. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to synthesize a novel approach that is related to weld joint identification and detection, and then develop a new approach based on contour regions for recognition and identification of butt welding joint in robot welding. The methodology involved in identification and detection approach was implemented in two stages: (1) pre-processing and (2) segmentation. The butt welding joint for recognizing position from the starting, auxiliary 1, auxiliary 2, and ending of the joint shape was obtained from contour and region points. The recognized process was done in two stages: (1) a new approach based on the shape of weld joints and (2) weld joint representation in three approaches which are (1) middle point of each end of two lines, (2) maximum or minimum row of the lines depending on auxiliary points, and (3) intersection point between the two lines. The findings of the approach show that the largest image-matching error happened in approach (3); however, this approach has a smaller matching error compared to the actual position. The expected output is that a weld joint can allocate the position from the start, auxiliary 1 and auxiliary 2, and end points in x-y coordinates to instruct the welding robot to weld. This research will significantly increase the welding process of mass production from low to medium volume manufacturing either repair or maintenance work should be faster than welding parts manually.

Keywords

Weld joint representation Butt welding localization and identification Segmentation Image matching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

This study received financial assistance from the Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) and Center for Robotics and Industrial Automation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM).

References

  1. 1.
    Kong M, Shi FH, Chen SB, Lin T (2007) Recognition of the initial position of weld based on the corner identification for welding robot in global environment. Robotic weldng intelligence and automation, pp 249–255Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Micallef K, Fang G, Dinham M (2011) Automatic seam identification and path planning in robotic welding. Robotic welding intelligence and automation, pp 23–32Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pachidis TP, Lygouras JN (2007) Vision-based path generation method for a robot based arc welding system. J Intell Robot Syst 48(3):307–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen XZ, Chen SB (2010) The autonomous identification and guiding of start position for arc welding robot. Ind Robot 37(1):70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ye Z, Fang G, Chen S, Dinham M (2013) A robust algorithm for weld seam extraction based on prior knowledge of weld seam. Sensor 33(2):125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qin J, Ma GH, Liu P (2011) Image processing algorithm of weld seam based on crawling robot by binocular vision. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on industrial technologyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zou YR, Du D, Guo G (2010) Image matching for weld seam tracking based on nonlinear dimensionality reduction method Isomap. Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge DiscoveryGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daeinabi K, Teshnehlab M (2006) Seam tracking of intelligent arc welding robot. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Syst Theory & Scientific Computation, pp 161–166Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graaf MD, Aarts R, Jonker B, Meijer J (2010) Real-time seam tracking for robotic laser welding using trajectory-based control. J Control Eng Pract 18(8):944–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moradi AN, Dezfulli BMA, Alavi CSE (2013) Development a vision based seam tracking system for none destructive testing machines. Int J Comput Sci Netw Solut 1(4):45–56Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dinham M, Fang G (2013) Autonomous weld seam detection and localisation using eye-in-hand stereo vision for robotic arc welding. J Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(5):288–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sulaiman M, Shah MHN, Harun MH, Lim WT, Kazim MNFM (2013) A 3D gluing defect inspection system using shape-based matching application from two cameras. Int Rev Comput Softw 8(8):1997–2004Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sulaiman M, Shah MHN, Harun MH, Kazim MNFM (2014) Defect inspection system for shape-based matching using two cameras. J Theor Appl Inf Technol 61(2):288–297Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scharstien D, Szeliski R (2002) A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. Int J Comput Vis 47:37–42Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Le Brese C, Zou J, Uy B (2010) An improved ASIFT algorithm for matching repeated patterns. IEEE 17th International Conference on Image Processing, pp 2949–2952Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M Zuliani KCS, Manjunath BS (2005) The Multiransac algorithm and its application to detect planar homographies. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp 153–156Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hartley RI, Zisserman A (2003) Multiple view geometry in computer vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dinham M, Fang G (2014) Detection of fillet weld joints using an adaptive line growing algorithm for robotic arc welding. J Robot Comput Integr Manuf 30(3):229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen XB, Chen SB, Lin T (2007) Recognition of macroscopic seam for complex robotic welding environment. Robotic welding, intelligence and automation, pp 171–178Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Takarics B, Szemes PT, Nemeth G, Korondi P (2008) Welding trajectory reconstruction based on the intelligent space concept. Proceedings of the IEEE 2008 conference on human system interactions, pp 791–796Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dinham M, Fang G (2012) Weld seam detection using computer vision for robotic arc welding. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering, pp 679–774Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chang DY, Son DH, Lee JW, Lee DH, Kim TW, Lee KY, Kim J (2012) A new seam-tracking algorithm through characteristic point detection for a portable welding robot. J Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prakash A, Kim J (2015) Vision algorithm for seam tracking in automatic welding system. Int J Recent Adv Mech Eng 4(1)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shi F, Zhou L, Lin T, Chen S (2007) Efficient weld seam detection for robotic welding from a single image. Robotic Welding, Intelligence and Automation, pp 289–294Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shah MHN, Sulaiman M, Shukor AZ, Ab Rashid MZ (2017) Recognition of butt welding joints using background subtraction seam path approach for welding robot. Int J Mech Mechatron Eng (IJMME) 17(1):57–62Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shen HY, Lin T, Chen SB (2007) A study on vision based real time seam tracking in robotic arc welding. Robotic Welding, Intelligence and Automation, pp 311–318Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kiddee P, Fang ZJ, Tan M (2014) Visual recognition of the initial and end points of lap joint for welding robots. Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Information and AutomationGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shah MHN, Sulaiman M, Shukor AZ (2017) Autonomous detection and identification of weld seam path shape position. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(12):3739–3747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shah MHN, Sulaiman M, Shukor AZ, Kamis Z, Ab Rahman A (2018) Butt welding joints recognition and location identification by using local thresholding. J Robot Comput Integr Manuf 51:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shah MHN, Sulaiman M, Shukor AZ, Kamis Z (2017) An experiment of detection and localization in tooth saw shape for butt joint using KUKA welding robot. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(12):3739–3747CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hairol Nizam Mohd Shah
    • 1
  • Marizan Sulaiman
    • 1
  • Ahmad Zaki Shukor
    • 1
  • Zalina Kamis
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Robotics and Industrial Automation, Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia MelakaMalacca CityMalaysia

Personalised recommendations