Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Determination of the yield loci of four sheet materials (AA6111-T4, AC600, DX54D+Z, and H220BD+Z) by using uniaxial tensile and hydraulic bulge tests

  • 171 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

In sheet metal forming simulation, a flow curve and a yield criterion are vital requirements for obtaining reliable numerical results. It is more appropriate to determine a flow curve by using biaxial stress condition tests, such as the hydraulic bulge test, than a uniaxial test because hardening proceeds higher strains before necking occurs. In a uniaxial test, higher strains are extrapolated, which might lead to incorrect results. The bulge test, coupled with the digital image correlation (DIC) system, is used to obtain stress–strain data. In the absence of the DIC system, analytical methods are used to estimate hardening. Typically, such models incorporate a correction factor to achieve correlation to experimental data. An example is the Chakrabarty and Alexander method, which uses a correction factor based on the n value. Here, the Chakrabarty and Alexander approach was modified using a correction factor based on normal anisotropy. When compared with DIC data, the modified model was found to be able to better predict the hardening curves for the materials examined in this study. Because a biaxial flow curve is required to compute the biaxial yield stress, which is an essential input to advanced yield functions, the effects of the various approaches used to determine the biaxial stress–strain data on the shape of the BBC2005 yield loci were also investigated. The proposed method can accurately predict the magnitude of the biaxial yield stress, when compared with DIC data, for all materials investigated in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Banabic D (2010) Sheet metal forming processes. Springer, Switzerland

  2. 2.

    Banabic D, Barlat F, Cazacu O, Kuwabara T (2010) Advances in anisotropy and formability. Int J Mater Form 3:165–189

  3. 3.

    Sigvant M, Mattiasson K, Vegter H, Thilderkvist P (2009) A viscous pressure bulge test for the determination of a plastic hardening curve and equibiaxial material data. Int J Mater Form 2:235–242

  4. 4.

    Gutscher G, Wu H-C, Ngaile G, Altan T (2004) Determination of flow stress for sheet metal forming using the viscous pressure bulge (VPB) test. J Mater Process Technol 146:1–7

  5. 5.

    Bruschi S, Altan T, Banabic D, Bariani PF, Brosius A, Cao J, Ghiotti A, Khraisheh M, Merklein M, Tekkaya AE (2014) Testing and modelling of material behaviour and formability in sheet metal forming. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63:727–749

  6. 6.

    Vegter H, Ten Horn CHLJ, An Y, Atzema EH, Atzema EH, Pijlman HH, Van Den Boogaard AH, Huetink H (2003) Characterisation and modelling of the plastic material behaviour and its application in sheet metal forming simulation. In: Onate E, Owen DRJ (eds) 7th international conference on computational plasticity, COMPLAS VII, Barcelona, pp 1–20

  7. 7.

    Mulder J, Vegter H, Aretz H, Keller S, Van Den Boogaard AH (2015) Accurate determination of flow curves using the bulge test with optical measuring systems. J Mater Process Technol 226:169–187

  8. 8.

    Campos H, Santos AD, Martins B, Ito K, Mori N, Barlat F (2014) Hydraulic bulge test for stress-strain curve determination and damage calibration for Ito-Goya model. In: 11th world congress on computational mechanics (WCCM XI), Barcelona

  9. 9.

    Altan T, Palaniswamy H, Bortot P, Heidl W, Bechtold A (2006) Determination of sheet material properties using biaxial bulge tests. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on accuracy in forming technology, Stadthalle Chemnitz, pp 79–92

  10. 10.

    Aretz H, Barlat F (2013) New convex yield functions for orthotropic metal plasticity. Int J Non-Linear Mech 51:97–111

  11. 11.

    Koç M, Billur E, Cora ÖN (2011) An experimental study on the comparative assessment of hydraulic bulge test analysis methods. Mater Des 32:272–281

  12. 12.

    Mattiasson K, Sigvant M (2008) An evaluation of some recent yield criteria for industrial simulations of sheet forming processes. Int J Mech Sci 50:774–787

  13. 13.

    Lazarescu L, Comsa DS, Banabic D (2011) Analytical and experimental evaluation of the stress-strain curves of sheet metals by hydraulic bulge tests. Key Eng Mater 473:352–359

  14. 14.

    Lăzărescu L, Nicodim I, Ciobanu I, Comşa DS, Banabic D (2013) Determination of material parameters of sheet metals using the hydraulic bulge test. Acta Metall Slovaca 19:4–12

  15. 15.

    Billur E, Koç M (2008) Comparative study on hydraulic bulge testing and analysis methods. In: International manufacturing science and engineering conference, American society of mechanical engineers, USA, pp 59–65

  16. 16.

    Hill R (1950) A theory of the plastic bulging of a metal diaphragm by lateral pressure. London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 41:1133–1142

  17. 17.

    Panknin W (1959) The hydraulic bulge test and the determination of the flow stress curves. University of Stuttgart, Germany

  18. 18.

    Chakrabarty J, Alexander JM (1970) Hydrostatic bulging of circular diaphragms. J Strain Anal Eng Des 5:155–161

  19. 19.

    Kruglov A, Enikeev F, Lutfullin R (2002) Superplastic forming of a spherical shell out a welded envelope. Mater Sci Eng A 323:416–426

  20. 20.

    Lazarescu L, Comsa D-S, Nicodim I, Ciobanu I, Bananic D (2012) Investigation of bulge radius variation and its effect on the flow stress in the hydraulic bulge test. In: 14th internatinal conference of metal forming, Krakow, pp 395–398

  21. 21.

    Reis LC, Oliveira MC, Santos AD, Fernandes JV (2016) On the determination of the work hardening curve using the bulge test. Int J Mech Sci 105:158–181

  22. 22.

    Laurent H, Grèze R, Manach PY, Thuillier S (2009) Influence of constitutive model in springback prediction using the split-ring test. Int J Mech Sci 51:233–245

  23. 23.

    Banabic D, Sester M (2012) Influence of material models on the accuracy of the sheet forming simulation. Mater Manuf Process 27:273–277

  24. 24.

    Mattiasson K (2005) On the influence of the yield locus shape in the simulation of sheet stretch forming. In: AIP conference proceedings, pp 395–400

  25. 25.

    Beier T, Gerlach J, Kessler L, Linnepe M (2010) A discussion of benefits and challenges by using multiparameter yield locus models in FEM-simulation. In: Int. Deep Draw. Res. Gr., pp 679–686

  26. 26.

    Banabic D, Balan T, Comsa DS (2000) A new yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane stress conditions. In: The seventh confer-ence TPR2000, Cluj Napoca, pp 17–224

  27. 27.

    Banabic D, Kuwabara T, Balan T, Comsa DS, Julean D (2003) Non-quadratic yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane-stress conditions. Int J Mech Sci 45:797–811

  28. 28.

    Banabic D, Aretz H, Comsa DS, Paraianu L (2005) An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets. Int J Plast 21:493–512

  29. 29.

    Banabic D, Comsa DS, Sester M, Selig M, Kubli W, Mattiasson K, Sigvant M (2008) Influence of constitutive equations on the accuracy of prediction in sheet metal forming simulation. In: Numisheet, Interlaken, Switzerland, pp 39–42

  30. 30.

    Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Pourboghrat F, Choi SH, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory. Int J Plast 19:1297–1319

  31. 31.

    Barlat F, Yoon JW, Cazacu O (2007) On linear transformations of stress tensors for the description of plastic anisotropy. Int J Plast 23:876–896

  32. 32.

    Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 193:281–297

  33. 33.

    Atkinson M (1997) Accurate determination of biaxial stress—strain relationships from hydraulic bulging tests of sheet metals. Int J Mech Sci 39:761–769

  34. 34.

    Marciniak Z, Duncan J, Hu S (2002) Mechanics of sheet metal forming. Butterworth-Heinemann, London

  35. 35.

    Ross EW, Prager W (1954) On the theory of the bulge test. Q Appl Math 12:86–91

  36. 36.

    Wagoner RH, Chenot J-L (1996) Fundamentals of metal forming. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Dunfermline

  37. 37.

    Lee M-G, Kim D, Kim C, Wenner ML, Wagoner RH, Chung K (2005) Spring-back evaluation of automotive sheets based on isotropic-kinematic hardening laws and non-quadratic anisotropic yield functions, part II: characterization of material properties. Int J Plast 21:883–914

  38. 38.

    Voce E (1955) A practical strain-hardening function. Metallurgia 51:219–226

  39. 39.

    Hollomon JH (1945) Tensile deformation. Trans Metall Soc AIME 162:268–290

  40. 40.

    Chen K, Scales M, Kyriakides S (2018) Material hardening of a high ductility aluminum alloy from a bulge test. Int J of Mech Sci 138-139:476–488

  41. 41.

    Alharthi, H. (2016). Accurate descriptions of the ansiotropic plastic yielding behaviour of various metallic sheets (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to acknowledge the Saudi government and Umm Al-Qura University for funding his PhD studies.

Author information

Correspondence to Hamzah Alharthi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alharthi, H., Hazra, S., Alghamdi, A. et al. Determination of the yield loci of four sheet materials (AA6111-T4, AC600, DX54D+Z, and H220BD+Z) by using uniaxial tensile and hydraulic bulge tests. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98, 1307–1319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2339-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Biaxial flow curve
  • Yield criterion
  • Bulge test
  • Normal anisotropy