Multi-response parametric optimization of squeeze casting process for fabricating Al 6061-SiC composite
- 16 Downloads
The current study aims to investigate the effects of process parameters on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of Al 6061-SiC composite fabricated via squeeze casting. Seventeen experiments in total have been conducted according to Box-Behnken experimental design which contained three process parameters (squeeze pressure, melt temperature, and SiC wt.%) while recording the responses including ultimate tensile strength, hardness, and percentage elongation. ANOVA (analysis of variance) was employed to evaluate the significance and prediction capability of mathematical models developed through regression analysis. The results indicate that squeeze pressure, melt temperature, and SiC wt.% significantly affect the responses whereas ductility is drastically reduced at higher concentrations of SiC reinforcement. SEM micrographs of failed test specimen have been found to be indicative of ductile fracture at higher levels of squeeze pressure and melt temperature. The multi-objective optimization problem has been transformed to an equivalent single-objective problem using grey relation analysis. The desirability analysis revealed optimum setting of process parameters which was confirmed to have improved the ultimate tensile strength by 1.61%, hardness by 1.56%, and percentage elongation by 11.11% as compared to the initial setting.
KeywordsSqueeze casting Aluminum matrix composite Al 6061 SiC RSM ANOVA GRA
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Sadagopan P, Natarajan HK, Kumar P (2018) Study of silicon carbide-reinforced aluminum matrix composite brake rotor for motorcycle application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1–4):1461–1475Google Scholar
- 5.Gupta S, Giri A, Adhikari S, Srivastava V (2018) Development and characterization of in-situ aluminum–titanium carbide composites prepared by pneumatic powder injection route. In: TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition. SpringerGoogle Scholar
- 30.Ali MA, Jahanzaib M, Wasim A, Hussain S, Anjum NA (2018) Evaluating the effects of as-casted and aged overcasting of Al-Al joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1–4):1377–1392Google Scholar
- 33.Soundararajan R, Ramesh A, Sivasankaran S, Vignesh M (2017) Modeling and analysis of mechanical properties of aluminium alloy (A413) reinforced with boron carbide (B4C) processed through squeeze casting process using artificial neural network model and statistical technique. Materials Today: Proceedings 4(2):2008–2030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Testing, A.A.S.f. and Materials (2009) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM internationalGoogle Scholar
- 43.Chang C-L, Tsai C-H, Chen L (2003) Applying grey relational analysis to the decathlon evaluation model. Int J Comput Internet Manage 11(3):54–62Google Scholar
- 44.Pradhan M (2013) Optimization of MRR, TWR and surface roughness of EDMed D2 Steel using an integrated approach of RSM, GRA and Entropy measutement method. in Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability (ICEETS), 2013 International Conference. IEEEGoogle Scholar
- 48.Moćko W and Kowalewski ZL (2011) Mechanical properties of A359/SiCp metal matrix composites at wide range of strain rates. in Applied Mechanics and Materials. Trans Tech PublGoogle Scholar
- 51.Gurusamy P, Prabu SB (2013) Effect of the squeeze pressure on the mechanical properties of the squeeze cast Al/SiCp metal matrix composite. Int J Microstruct Mater Prop 8(4–5):299–312Google Scholar
- 52.Bangaru M, Murugan TA, Arunachalam R (2015) Development of metal matrix nanocomposites of AA6061–SiCp using ultrasonic cavitations in squeeze casting process. In: ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical EngineersGoogle Scholar