Advertisement

Energy efficiency evaluation of metal laser direct deposition based on process characteristics and empirical modeling

  • Wen Liu
  • Haiying WeiEmail author
  • Chu Huang
  • Fengbo Yuan
  • Yi Zhang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

Metal laser direct deposition (MLDD) is a typical process in additive manufacturing (AM), which permits the build of complex and fully dense metallic parts by using laser to melt the metal powder layer by layer. However, the process is characterized by high energy consumption and low energy efficiency. This paper established an empirical model to characterize the relationship between process parameters and energy efficiency for MLDD based on the essence of thermodynamics physical energy conversion. Additionally, a recognition method of cross-sectional profile of the deposited layer was achieved by adding tungsten carbide (WC) powder, which greatly improved the measurement reliability. Taguchi experiment and regression identification method were applied, and the relative error of the model was less than 10%. The results show that laser power has significant influence on the process energy efficiency of MLDD. The energy efficiency of single-track multi-layer stacking (SMS) process and multi-track single-layer lapping (MSL) process increased by 5.7% and 50.3%, respectively, under the optimal process parameter condition. The proposed model can be used effectively for the energy efficiency evaluation and offer the potential for improving the sustainability of MLDD.

Keywords

Energy efficiency Metal laser direct deposition (MLDD) Cross-sectional profile Taguchi experiment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

This research investigation was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51605156) and Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen (Grant No. JCYJ20160530192452107). Their financial contributions are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Priarone PC, Ingarao G (2017) Towards criteria for sustainable process selection: on the modelling of pure subtractive versus additive/subtractive integrated manufacturing approaches. J Clean Prod 144:57–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jia S, Tang R, Lv J, Yuan Q, Peng T (2016) Energy consumption modeling of machining transient states based on finite state machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5–8):2305–2320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8952-2 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ford S, Despeisse M (2016) Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J Clean Prod 137:1573–1587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang R, Riddle M, Graziano D, Warren J, Das S, Nimbalkar S, Cresko J, Masanet E (2016) Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: the case of lightweight aircraft components. J Clean Prod 135:1559–1570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang X, Li W, Cui W, Liou F (2018) Modeling of worn surface geometry for engine blade repair using laser-aided direct metal deposition process. Manuf Lett 15:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2017.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herzog D, Seyda V, Wycisk E, Emmelmann C (2016) Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater 117:371–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leal R, Barreiros FM, Alves L, Romeiro F, Vasco JC, Santos M, Marto C (2017) Additive manufacturing tooling for the automotive industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5–8):1671–1676.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0239-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shi T, Lu B, Shen T, Zhang R, Shi S, Fu G (2018) Closed-loop control of variable width deposition in laser metal deposition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(9–12):4167–4178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1895-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thompson SM, Bian L, Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part I: Transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics. Addit Manuf 8:36–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heigel JC, Michaleris P, Reutzel EW (2015) Thermo-mechanical model development and validation of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V. Addit Manuf 5:9–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Campanelli SL, Angelastro A, Signorile CG, Casalino G (2016) Investigation on direct laser powder deposition of 18 Ni (300) marage steel using mathematical model and experimental characterisation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(1–4):885–895.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9135-x Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ning F, Cong W (2016) Microstructures and mechanical properties of Fe-Cr stainless steel parts fabricated by ultrasonic vibration-assisted laser engineered net shaping process. Mater Lett 179:61–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.05.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Angelastro A, Campanelli SL, Casalino G (2017) Statistical analysis and optimization of direct metal laser deposition of 227-F Colmonoy nickel alloy. Opt Laser Technol 94:138–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guo P, Zou B, Huang C, Gao H (2017) Study on microstructure, mechanical properties and machinability of efficiently additive manufactured AISI 316L stainless steel by high-power direct laser deposition. J Mater Process Technol 240:12–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park JS, Park JH, Lee MG, Sung JH, Cha KJ, Kim DH (2016) Effect of energy input on the characteristic of AISI H13 and D2 tool steels deposited by a directed energy deposition process. Metall Mater Trans A 47(5):2529–2535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3427-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A, Bian L, Thompson SM (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part II: Mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control. Addit Manuf 8:12–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun G, Zhou R, Lu J, Mazumder J (2015) Evaluation of defect density, microstructure, residual stress, elastic modulus, hardness and strength of laser-deposited AISI 4340 steel. Acta Mater 84:172–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yoon HS, Lee JY, Kim HS, Kim MS, Kim ES, Shin YJ, Chu WS, Ahn SH (2014) A comparison of energy consumption in bulk forming, subtractive, and additive processes: review and case study. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Gt 1(3):261–279.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-014-0033-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Unocic RR, Dupont JN (2004) Process efficiency measurements in the laser engineered net shaping process. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 35(1):143–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-004-0104-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gedda H, Powell J, Wahlström G, Li WB, Engström H, Magnusson C (2002) Energy redistribution during CO2 laser cladding. J Laser Appl 14(2):78–82.  https://doi.org/10.2351/1.1471565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang D, Hu Q, Zheng Y, Xie Y, Zeng X (2016) Study on deposition rate and laser energy efficiency of laser-induction hybrid cladding. Opt Laser Technol 77:16–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Z, Ning F, Cong W, Jiang Q, Li T, Zhang H, Zhou Y (2016) Energy consumption and saving analysis for laser engineered net shaping of metal powders. Energies 9(10):763.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en9100763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clemon L, Sudradjat A, Jaquez M, Krishna A, Rammah M, Dornfeld D (2013) Precision and energy usage for additive manufacturing. In: ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE2013). American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2013-65688
  24. 24.
    Mognol P, Lepicart D, Perry N (2006) Rapid prototyping energy and environment in the spotlight. Rapid Prototyp J 12(1):26–34.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610637246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Garg A, Lam JSL, Savalani MM (2016) A new variant of genetic programming in formulation of laser energy consumption model of 3d printing process. Handbook of Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing, pp 31–50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0549-7_3
  26. 26.
    Kellens K, Yasa E, Renaldi R, Dewulf W, Kruth JP, Duflou J (2011) Energy and resource efficiency of SLS/SLM processes. Proceedings of the 23rd Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 2011: 1–16Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Papadakis L, Chantzis D, Salonitis K (2017) On the energy efficiency of pre-heating methods in SLM/SLS processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(1–4):1325–1338.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1287-9 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baumers M, Tuck C, Wildman R, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Energy inputs to additive manufacturing does capacity utilization matter. Proceedings of the 23rd Solide Freeform Fabrication Symposium 2011: 30-40. 29Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baumers M (2012) Economic aspects of additive manufacturing: benefits, costs and energy consumption. Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Faludi J, Bayley C, Bhogal S, Iribarne M (2015) Comparing environmental impacts of additive manufacturing vs traditional machining via life-cycle assessment. Rapid Prototyp J 21(1):14–33.  https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-07-2013-0067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Serres N, Tidu D, Sankare S, Hlawka F (2011) Environmental comparison of MESO-CLAD® process and conventional machining implementing life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 19(9–10):1117–1124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Morrow WR, Qi H, Kim I, Mazumder J, Skerlos SJ (2007) Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing. J Clean Prod 15(10):932–943.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Paris H, Mokhtarian H, Coatanéa E, Museau M, Ituarte IF (2016) Comparative environmental impacts of additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65(1):29–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Le VT, Paris H (2018) A life cycle assessment-based approach for evaluating the influence of total build height and batch size on the environmental performance of electron beam melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(1–14):275–288.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2264-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Duflou JR, Sutherland JW, Dornfeld D, Herrmann C, Jeswiet J, Kara S, Hauschild M, Kellens K (2012) Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: a processes and systems approach. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):587–609.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fysikopoulos A, Pastras G, Alexopoulos T, Chryssolouris G (2014) On a generalized approach to manufacturing energy efficiency. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(9–12):1437–1452.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5818-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yan W, Zhang H, Z-g J, Hon KKB (2017) Multi-objective optimization of arc welding parameters: the trade-offs between energy and thermal efficiency. J Clean Prod 140:1842–1849.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Partes K, Pearsall TP, Seefeld T, Sepold G, Vollertsen F (2005) Increased efficiency in laser cladding by optimization of beam intensity and travel speed. Proc SPIE 6157:61570O.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.661138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang HY, Zuo DW, Chen YJ, Ma H (2009) Effects of processing parameters on energy efficiency of squash presetting laser cladding. Mater Sci Forum 628-629:679–684.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.628-629.679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vinod AR, Srinivasa CK, Keshavamurthy R, Shashikumar PV (2016) A novel technique for reducing lead-time and energy consumption in fabrication of Inconel-625 parts by laser-based metal deposition process. Rapid Prototyp J 22(2):269–280.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2013-0070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle BodyHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory for Intelligent Laser Manufacturing of Hunan ProvinceHunan UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations