Organizational design based on simulation modeling
- 114 Downloads
Usage of advanced simulation technology—object-oriented and agent-based (OAA) approach for modeling of organizational structure and its functioning;
Usage of modified organizational matrixes (tables) and usable “message objects” to overcome communication system modeling complexity;
Usage of simulation for obtaining quantitative values of the system performance.
The use of the methodology creates possibilities to examine and evaluate organizational changes and opportunities.
Results of the investigation based on the methodology in the real system are presented in a case study.
KeywordsOrganization Structure Design Modeling Object-oriented Simulation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Champy J, Hammer M (2001) Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 2.Mumford E, Hendricks R (1997) Re-engineering rhetoric and reality: the rise and fall of a management fashion, ESRC Business Process Resource Center. URL:http://bprc.warwick.ac.yu/rc-repb-6.html
- 5.Harringhton HJ (1991) Business process improvement, the breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 6.Park RJ (1998) Value engineering: a plan for invention. St. Lucie Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Womack JP, Jones DT (1996) Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Smith KB (1989) Combat information flow. Mil Rev:41–54Google Scholar
- 10.Killbrew R (1998) Learning from war games: a status report, parameters. US Army War College Quarterly:122–135Google Scholar
- 11.Sterman, J (1998) Introduction to system dynamics: modelling for organizational learning. MIT Google Scholar
- 12.Vukicevic S (1995) Warehouses. Preving, Belgrade (in Serbian) Google Scholar
- 14.Pitcher P (1993) Balancing personality types at the top. Business Quarterly, Western Business School, London, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 15.Venter C (1998) Planning for transformation: continuity in change, the SA Army in transition, monograph no. 26, edited by Jakkier ClilliersGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lammers LL (2003) Plan of the day (POD)—a process to manage daily activities, CSI Services, Inc., an Emerson Process Management Company, www.Reliability.web.com
- 17.Adizes I (1990) Organizational life cycle. Politika 1990 (in Serbian) Google Scholar
- 18.Naim MM, Lewis JC (2007) Benchmarking of aftermarket supply chains. Production Planning & Control 6(3):258–269Google Scholar
- 19.Svee H, Saebo JH, Vatn J (1998) Estimating the potential benefit of introducing RCM on railway infrastructure. Safety and Reliability, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
- 20.Repenning PN, Sterman JD (1997) Getting quality, the old-fashioned way: self-confirming attributions in the dynamic of process improvement, paper prepared for National Research CouncilGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kreutzer DP, Wiley V (1997) Making it happen: the implementation challenge, MITGoogle Scholar
- 22.Forester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York-LondonGoogle Scholar
- 24.Larman C (1998) Applying UML and patterns. PTR, Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
- 30.IDEF1, IDEF2, IDEF3 - manualGoogle Scholar
- 31.WITNESS- manualGoogle Scholar
- 32.Stanojevic P, Miskovic V, Bukvic V et al. (2000) Yugoslav military forces logistics organization, Project reportGoogle Scholar