The material removal process in grinding and lapping of brittle materials leads to different kinds of defects such as microcracks, fractures, scratches, and deformed areas which can exist under the finished surface in the layer called subsurface damage (SSD). In this work, experiments were carried out to study the impact of the ultrasonic assistance during grinding machining of the Zerodur® glass ceramic. The effect of the process parameters on the surface formation and the subsurface damage was investigated. The SSD depth was measured using the dimple method in combination with the use of the optical microscopy for the morphological study of the SSD, while the surface roughness was measured using the mechanical profilometer. The experimental results showed that the SSD depth generated within the ultrasonic assisted grinding is about 35 % less than that of the conventional grinding process. On the other hand, the surface quality obtained by the conventional grinding was superior to that of ultrasonic assisted grinding. To validate the experimental results, the SSD values measured by the dimple method are compared with the values obtained in both the experiments and other theoretical previous studies. It was concluded that machining of the Zerodur® glass ceramic with ultrasonic assistance is more suitable than that with the conventional grinding. This study provides valuable insights into the material removal mechanism and the dependence of surface and subsurface integrities on grinding mode with/without ultrasonic assistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Lindig O, Pannhorst W (1985) Thermal expansion and length stability of Zerodur® in dependence on temperature and time. Appl Opt 24:3330–3334
Birch KP, Wilton PT (1988) Thermal expansion data for Zerodur® from 247 to 373 K. Appl Opt 27:2813–2815
Döhring T., Jedamzik R., Thomas A., Hartmann P (2008) Forty years of ZERODUR® mirror substrates for astronomy—review and outlook. Proc of SPIE 7018:70183B-70181-70183B-70112
Shen J, Liu S, Yi K, He H, Shao J, Fan Z (2005) Subsurface damage in optical substrates. Optik 116:288–294
Lambropoulos J, Jacobs S, Gillman B, Yang F, Ruckman J (1997) Subsurface damage in microgrinding optical glasses. LLE Review 73:45–49
Kranenberg C, Jungling K (1994) Subsurface damage identification in optically transparent materials using a nondestructive method. Appl Opt 33:4248–4253
Wang Z, Wu Y, Dai Y, Li S (2008) Subsurface damage distribution in the lapping process. Appl Opt 47:1417–1426
Belkhir N, Bouzid D, Herold V (2009) Surface behavior during abrasive grain action in the glass lapping process. Appl Surf Sci 255:7951–7958
Belkhir N, Bouzid D, Lakhedari F, Aliouane T, Raedlein E (2011) Characterization of glass surface damaged by alumina abrasive grains. J Non-Cryst Solids 357:2882–2887
Suratwala T, Steele R, Feit MD, Wong L, Miller P, Menapace J, Davis P (2009) Effect of rogue particles on the sub-surface damage of fused silica during grinding/polishing. J Non-Cryst Solids 354:2023–2037
Agarwal S, Rao P (2008) Experimental investigation of surface/subsurface damage formation and material removal mechanisms in SiC grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:698–710
Camp D, Kozlowski M, Sheehan L, Nichols M, Dovik M, Raether R (1998) Subsurface damage and polishing compound affect the 355-nm laser damage threshold of fused silica surfaces, laser induced damage in optical materials. Proc of SPIE 3244:356–364
Prabhakar M, Ferreira D, Haselkorn PM (1992) An experimental investigation of material removal rates in rotary ultrasonic machining. North Am Manuf Res Inst SME 99:211–212
Uhlmann E, Spur G (1998) Surface formation in creep feed grinding of advanced ceramics with and without ultrasonic assistance. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 47:249–252
Qu W, Wang K, Miller M, Huang Y, Chandra A (2000) Using vibration-assisted grinding to reduce subsurface damage. Precis Eng 24:329–337
Bifano T, Dow T, Scattergood R (1991) Ductile-regime grinding: a new technology for machining brittle materials. J Eng Ind 113:184
Gao G, Zhao B, Xiang D, Kong Q (2009) Research on the surface characteristics in ultrasonic grinding nano-zirconia ceramics. J Mater Process Technol 209:32–37
Lv D, Tang Y, Wang H, Huang Y (2013) Experimental investigations on subsurface damage in rotary ultrasonic machining of glass Bk7. Mach Sci Technol 17:443–463
Amini S, Khosrojerdi MR, Nosouhi R, Behbahani S (2014) An experimental investigation on the machinability of Al2O3in vibration-assisted turning using PCD tool. Mater Manuf Process 29(3):331–336. doi:10.1080/10426914.2013.864411
Yang F (2005) Effect of subsurface damage on indentation behavior of ground ULE™ glass. J Non-Cryst Solids 351:3861–3865
Lv D, Huang Y, Wang H, Tang Y, Wu X (2013) Improvement effects of vibration on cutting force in rotary ultrasonic machining of BK7 glass. J Mater Process Technol 213:1548–1557
Yan J, Asami T, Harada H, Kuriyagawa T (2009) Fundamental investigation of subsurface damage in single crystalline silicon caused by diamond machining. Precis Eng 33:378–386
Li H, Yu T, Zhu L, Wang W (2016) Evaluation of grinding-induced subsurface damage in optical glass BK7. J Mater Process Technol 229:785–794
Lambropoulos J, Li Y, Funkenbusch P, Ruckman J (1999) Non-contact estimate of grinding-induced subsurface damage. Proc of SPIE 3782:41–50
About this article
Cite this article
Lakhdari, F., Bouzid, D., Belkhir, N. et al. Surface and subsurface damage in Zerodur® glass ceramic during ultrasonic assisted grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 1993–2000 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9551-y
- Subsurface damage
- Ultrasonic assisted grinding
- Conventional grinding
- Surface roughness