Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Determination of mechanical properties of anisotropic thin-walled tubes under three-dimensional stress state

Abstract

Tube hydro-bulging test is a specialized method to obtain the mechanical properties of tubes when they are deformed under bi-axial stress states. However, the normal stress cannot be ignored in double-sided tube hydroforming process. In order to investigate the mechanical properties of anisotropic thin-walled tubes under three-dimensional stress state, an analytical model for stress component calculation for fixed-end tube under internal and external pressures was proposed. Furthermore, the equivalent stress and the equivalent strain were derived using the Hill 1948 yield criterion through plastic increment theory. A thin-walled AA5052-O aluminum alloy tubes were bulged under different external pressures using a dedicated testing apparatus for double-sided tube hydro-bulging tests. Then, hardening curves considering anisotropy were obtained for each external pressure condition, respectively. It is shown that the strain hardening exponent of AA5052 tube shows a slight increase with the increasing external pressure, and the external pressure of 85 MPa has little or no effects on the hardening behavior of tubes. Moreover, the anisotropy has a little effect on the strain hardening exponent, but has an obvious influence on the strength coefficient of the AA5052 tube. Therefore, for the measurement of the AA5052 tube’s mechanical properties under three-dimensional stress state, the effect of external pressure can be ignored but the anisotropy of tubes must be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Yu Z, Kong Q, Ma C, Lin Z (2014) Theoretical and experimental study on formability of laser seamed tube hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 75(1):305–315

  2. 2.

    Khalfallah A (2014) Experimental and numerical assessment of mechanical properties of welded tubes for hydroforming. Mater Des 56:782–790

  3. 3.

    ISO 6892–1 (2009) Metallic materials—Tensile testing—Part 1: method of test at room temperature. ISO European Standards

  4. 4.

    Wang H, Bouchard R, Eagleson R, Martin P, Tyson W (2002) Ring hoop tension test (RHTT): a test for transverse tensile properties of tubular materials. J Test Eval 30:382–391

  5. 5.

    Saboori M, Champliaud H, Gholipour J, Gakwaya A, Savoie J, Wanjara P (2014) Evaluating the flow stress of aerospace alloys for tube hydroforming process by free expansion testing. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 72(9):1275–1286

  6. 6.

    Jiang L, Jonas JJ, Boyle K, Martin P (2008) Deformation behavior of two Mg alloys during ring hoop tension testing. Mater Sci Eng A 492:68–73

  7. 7.

    He ZB, Yuan SJ, Zha WW, Liang YC (2008) Force and deformation analysis of tube ring specimen during hoop tension test. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett) 44:423–427

  8. 8.

    Sokolowski T, Gerke K, Ahmetoglu M, Altan T (2000) Evaluation of tube formability and material characteristics: hydraulic bulge testing of tube. J Mater Process Technol 98:34–40

  9. 9.

    Hwang YM, Lin YK (2007) Evaluation of flow stresses of tubular materials considering anisotropic effects by hydraulic bulge tests. J Eng Mater Technol 129(3):414–421

  10. 10.

    Hwang YM, Wang CW (2009) Flow stress evaluation of zinc copper and carbon steel tubes by hydraulic bulge tests considering their anisotropy. J Mater Process Technol 209:4423–4428

  11. 11.

    Hwang YM, Lin YK, Altan T (2007) Evaluation of tubular materials by a hydraulic bulge test. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 47(2):343–331

  12. 12.

    Bortot P, Ceretti E, Giardini C (2008) The determination of flow stress of tubular material for hydroforming applications. J Mater Process Technol 203:381–388

  13. 13.

    Liu J, Liu X, Yang L, Liang H (2013) Determination of flow stress of thin-walled tube based on digital speckle correlation method for hydroforming applications. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 69(1):439–450

  14. 14.

    Kuwabara T, Yoshida K, Narihara K, Takahashi S (2005) Anisotropic plastic deformation of extruded aluminum alloy tube under axial forces and internal pressure. Int J Plast 21:101–117

  15. 15.

    Kuwabara T, Sugawara F (2012) Multiaxial tube expansion test method for measurement of sheet metal deformation behaviour under biaxial tension for a large strain range. Int J Plast 45:103–118

  16. 16.

    Strano M, Altan T (2004) An inverse energy approach to determine the flow stress of tubular materials for hydroforming applications. J Mater Process Technol 146(1):92–96

  17. 17.

    He ZB, Yuan SJ, Lin YL, Wang XS, Hu WL (2014) Analytical model for tube hydro- bulging tests, Part I: models for stress components and bulging zone profile. Inter J Mech Sci 87:297–306

  18. 18.

    He ZB, Yuan SJ, Lin YL, Wang XS, Hu WL (2014) Analytical model for tube hydro- bulging tests, Part II: linear model for pole thickness and its application. Inter J Mech Sci 87:307–315

  19. 19.

    Fuchs FJ (1966) Hydrostatic pressure: its role in metal forming. Mech Eng 88:34–40

  20. 20.

    Smith LM, Ganeshmurthy S, Alladi K (2003) Double-sided high-pressure tubular hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 142(3):599–608

  21. 21.

    Jain N, WanG J, Alexander R (2004) Finite element analysis of dual hydroforming processes. J Mater Process Technol 145(1):59–65

  22. 22.

    Jain N (2003) Modeling and analysis of dual hydroforming process. Dissertation, Texas A&M University

  23. 23.

    Jain N, Wang J (2005) Plastic instability in dual-pressure tube-hydroforming process. Inter J Mech Sci 47(12):1827–1837

  24. 24.

    Guven U (2009) Effect of the external pressure on the plastic instability of thin-walled tubes. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 223:1361–1365

  25. 25.

    Smith LM, Averill RC, Lucas JP, Stoughton TB, Matin PH (2003) Influence of transverse normal stress on sheet metal formability. Int J Plasticity 19(10):1567–1583

  26. 26.

    Fatemi A, Dariani BM (2015) Forming limit prediction of anisotropic material subjected to normal and through thickness shear stresses using a modified M–K model. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 80(9):1497–1509

  27. 27.

    Allwood JM, Shouler DR (2009) Generalised forming limit diagrams showing increased forming limits with non-planar stress states. Int J Plasticity 25(7):1207–1230

  28. 28.

    Cui XL, Wang XS, Yuan SJ (2014) Deformation analysis of double-sided tube hydroforming in square-section die. J Mater Process Technol 214(7):1341–1351

  29. 29.

    Cui XL, Wang XS, Yuan SJ (2014) Experimental verification to the influence of normal stress on the formability of thin-walled 5A02 aluminum alloy tubes. Inter J Mech Sci 88(11):232–243

  30. 30.

    Yuan SJ, Cui XL, Wang XS (2015) Investigation into wrinkling behavior of thin-walled 5A02 aluminum alloy tubes under internal and external pressure, Inter. J Mech Sci 92C:245–258

  31. 31.

    Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc Roy Soc London 193:281–297

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to S. J. Yuan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, X.L., Yuan, S.J. Determination of mechanical properties of anisotropic thin-walled tubes under three-dimensional stress state. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87, 1917–1927 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8526-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anisotropic thin-walled tubes
  • Mechanical properties
  • Tube hydro-bulging tests
  • Three-dimensional stress state
  • External pressure