Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

An access detection and machine cycle tracking system for machine safety

  • 159 Accesses

  • 1 Citations


The high number of occupational accidents occurring every year in the industrial sector is still one of the main social policy action areas of governments worldwide. Both technical and human failures are often addressed as the main causes for accidents at work. However, the lack of full hazard prevention effectiveness from currently available Safeguarding Devices is another factor that should be considered, at least, from an engineering viewpoint. This paper presents a recently patented Access Detection and Machine Cycle Tracking System (ADMCTS) for industrial machinery with active safety purposes. Active safety paradigm has greatly succeeded in the automotive sector in the last years, dramatically improving road traffic accident prevention by means of active devices with real-time capabilities. Based on a dedicated Computer Vision System (CVS) for real-time video analysis of a monitored safety zone, the ADMCTS performs three main functions: access and presence detection of objects entering and/or remaining within the monitored zone, machine cycle tracking, and warning and alarm signal handling to ensure that machine functions are only allowed when workplace conditions are safe. Machine cycle tracking provides the ADMCTS with an adaptive risk assessment capability for optimal prevention. In order to provide a thoughtful description of its functionality, a state machine model of the ADMCTS is introduced, and a visual walk-through of this model, as applied on a generic cutting machine, is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Allen–Bradley (ed) (2013) GuardMaster SC300 Hand Detection Safety Sensor Catalogue. Rockwell Automation, Inc. http://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/pp/442l-pp001_-en-p.pdf

  2. 2.

    Allen-Bradley (ed) (2011) Safebook 4: Safety related control systems for machinery-–principles, standards and implementation, vol 4. Rockwell Automation, Inc., https://www.rockwellautomation.com/resources/downloads/rockwellautomation/che/pdf/Safetyrelatedcontrolsystems_machinery.pdf

  3. 3.

    ANSI (2010) ANSI B11.0 — Safety of Machinery — General Requirements and Risk Assessment

  4. 4.

    Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013) Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses. Tech. rep., United States Department of Labor, USDL–14–2183, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf

  5. 5.

    Caputo AC, Pelagagge PM, Salini P (2013) AHP–Based methodology for selecting safety devices of industrial machinery. Saf Sci 53:202–218

  6. 6.

    Douglas WH (2009) The Failure of Risk Management: Why It’s Broken and How to Fix It. Wiley

  7. 7.

    Elhabian SY, El-Shayed KM, Ahmed SH (2008) Moving object detection in spatial domain using background removal techniques - state of art. Recent Patents on Computer Science 1(1):32–54

  8. 8.

    European Comission (ed) (2009) Causes and circumstances of accidents at work in the European Union. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=2785&langId=en

  9. 9.

    Fernández-Muñoz JA, Moreno-Rabel MD (2013) System for active and immediate detection and prevention of risks in industrial machinery. WO Patent App. PCT/ES2012/070,891. http://www.google.im/patents/WO2013093163A1?cl=un

  10. 10.

    Giraud L (2009) Machine Safety Book: Prevention of mechanical hazards, vol RG 597. Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en securité du travail (IRSST) and Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (CSST), http://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/pubirsst/rg-597.pdf

  11. 11.

    Goernemann O, Stubenrauch HJ (2013) Electro-sensitive protective devices (ESPEs); Opto-electronic protective devices. Sick Inc, http://www.sick.com/group/DE/home/service/safemachinery/standards_and%_regulations/Documents/8016058_WP_ESPE_en_20130328_WEB.pdf

  12. 12.

    González RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  13. 13.

    Helal S, Mokhtari M, Abdulrazak B (2008) The engineering handbook of smart technology for aging, disability, and independence. Wiley, New York

  14. 14.

    Herrmann JW, Delalio DR (2001) Algorithms for sheet metal nesting. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 17 (2):100–107

  15. 15.

    Hoffman PJ, Hopewell ES, Janes B, Sharp KM (2013) Precision machining technology. Delmar, Albany

  16. 16.

    IEC (2007) IEC 61496-4: Safety of machinery—electro-sensitive protective equipment—particular requirements for equipment using vision based protective devices (VBPD)

  17. 17.

    IEC (2008) IEC 61496-3: Safety of machinery—electro-sensitive protective equipment—Part 3: Particular requirements for active opto-electronic protective devices responsive to diffuse reflection (AOPDDR)

  18. 18.

    IEC (2012) IEC 61496-1: Safety of machinery—electro-sensitive protective equipment—Part 1: General requirements and tests

  19. 19.

    IEC (2013) IEC 61496-2: Safety of machinery—electro-sensitive protective equipment—Part 2: Particular requirements for equipment using active opto-electronic protective devices (AOPDs)

  20. 20.

    IEC (2014) IEC 61496-4-2: Safety of machinery—electro-sensitive protective equipment—particular requirements for equipment using vision based protective devices (VBPD)—additional requirements when using reference pattern techniques (VBPDPP)

  21. 21.

    IEC (2014) IEC 61496-4-3: Safety of machinery—electro-sensitive protective equipment—particular requirements for equipment using vision based protective devices (VBPD)—additional requirements when using reference stereo vision techniques (VBPDST)

  22. 22.

    ISO (2008) ISO 13857: Safety of machinery—safety distances to prevent hazard zones being reached by upper and lower limbs

  23. 23.

    ISO (2010) ISO 12100—safety of machinery—general principles for design—risk assessment and risk reduction

  24. 24.

    ISO (2010) ISO 13855: Safety of machinery—positioning of safeguards with respect to the approach speeds of parts of the human body

  25. 25.

    ISO (2013) ISO 13856-1: Safety of machinery—pressure-sensitive protective devices—Part 1: General principles for design and testing of pressure-sensitive mats and pressure-sensitive floors

  26. 26.

    JISHA (2014) Annual report. Tech. rep., Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association (JISHA), https://www.jisha.or.jp/international/pdf/JISHA_Annual_Report_2014.pdf

  27. 27.

    Jones WD (2001) Keeping cars from crashing. IEEE Spectr 38:40–45

  28. 28.

    Kelley D (1995) Automata and formal languages: an introduction. Prentice Hall

  29. 29.

    Koradecka D (ed) (2010) Handbook of occupational safety and health. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  30. 30.

    Lupin H, Marsot J (2006) Securité des machines et des equipements de travail: moyens de protection contre les risques mecaniques, vol ED 807. Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en securité du travail

  31. 31.

    Macdonald D (2004) Practical machinery safety. Newnes

  32. 32.

    Milanés V, Llorca DF, Villagrá J, Pérez J, Parra I, González C, Sotelo MA (2012) Vision-based active safety system for automatic stopping. Expert Systems with Applications 39(12):11, 234–11, 242

  33. 33.

    Nichani S, Silver W, Schatz DA (2004) Auto-setup of a video safety curtain system. US Patent 6,829, 371. http://www.google.com/patents/US6829371

  34. 34.

    Ridley J, Pearce D (2006) Safety with machinery. Routledge

  35. 35.

    Sansoni G, Trebeschi M, Docchio F (2009) State-of-the-art and applications of 3D imaging sensors in industry, cultural heritage, medicine, and criminal investigation. Sensors 9(1):568– 601

  36. 36.

    Sas K, Suárez A (2013) Priorities for occupational safety and health research in Europe: 2013–2020. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. doi:10.2802/25457

  37. 37.

    Schmidt B, Wang L (2014) Depth camera based collision avoidance via active robot control. J Manuf Syst 33(4):711– 718

  38. 38.

    Schuon S, Theobalt C, Davis J, Thrun S High-quality scanning using time-of-flight depth superresolution. IEEE computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–7

  39. 39.

    Sick Inc (ed) (2012) Guidelines for safe machinery: six steps to a safe machine. Sick Inc, https://mysick.com/saqqara/im0032606.pdf

  40. 40.

    Tan JTC, Arai T (2011) Triple stereo vision system for safety monitoring of human-robot collaboration in cellular manufacturing. IEEE/CIRP international symposium on assembly and manufacturing, pp 1–6

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to M. D. Moreno-Rabel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreno-Rabel, M.D., Fernández-Mu noz, J.A. An access detection and machine cycle tracking system for machine safety. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87, 77–101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8446-2

Download citation


  • Risk assessment
  • Machinery safety
  • Computer Vision System (CVS)
  • Access Detection and Machine Cycle Tracking System (ADMCTS)