Advertisement

Numerical modeling on the formation process of keyhole-induced porosity for laser welding steel with T-joint

  • 775 Accesses

  • 28 Citations

Abstract

A mathematical model of laser welding steel with a T-joint was developed in this paper to investigate the formation process of keyhole-induced porosity, helping to understand the mechanism of porosity formation in laser welding steels with heavy section. Solidification model and adiabatic bubble model were coupled in this model, which could more approximately reflect the formation process of bubble and its evolution into porosity. The volume-of-fluid (VOF) method was taken to track free surfaces of keyhole and porosity. The numerical results showed that the unstable keyhole during the laser welding process induced the collapse of keyhole and then resulted in bubbles in the molten pool. These bubbles moved following with the fluid flow in the molten pool, where some bubbles could escape out of molten pool under the competition of flow and solidification speed. But some bubbles captured by a solidified wall during the migration process in the molten pool would evolve into porosities. It was also found that some bubbles formed adjacent to a fusion line were easier to be captured by a solidification surface, which could give explanation for some porosities occurring close to the fusion line. A good agreement of simulation and experimental results proved the reliability of this mathematical model, while the mechanism of porosity formation was better clarified with this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    Pantsar H, Salminen A, Jansson A, Kujanpää V (2004) Quality and costs analysis of laser welded all steel sandwich panels. J Laser Appl 16:66–73

  2. 2.

    Romanoff J, Remes H, Socha G, Jutila M, Varsta P (2007) The stiffness of laser stake welded T-joints in web-core sandwich structures. Thin-Walled Struct 45(4):453–462. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2007.03.008

  3. 3.

    Roland F, Manzon L, Kujala P, Brede M, Weitzenbock J (2004) Advanced joining techniques in European shipbuilding. J Ship Prod 20(3):200–210

  4. 4.

    Beretta S, Previtali B (2009) Estimate of maximum pore size in keyhole laser welding of carbon steel. Sci Technol Weld Join 14(2):106–116. doi:10.1179/136217108x372577

  5. 5.

    Martukanitz RP (2005) A critical review of laser beam welding. In: Schriempf JT (ed), San Jose, CA, 2005. Critical review: industrial lasers and applications. Proceedings of SPIE, vol 5706, SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2005, pp 11–24

  6. 6.

    Aalderinka BJ, Aarts R, de Lange DF, Meijer J (2007) Experimental observation of keyhole shapes in the laser welding of aluminum blanks. J Laser Appl 19(4):245–251. doi:10.2351/1.2795756

  7. 7.

    Farson DF, Ali A, Li XC (1999) Laser weld penetration monitoring with multiple emission signal measurements. J Laser Appl 11(2):47–53

  8. 8.

    Sanders PG, Leong KH, Keske JS, Kornecki G (1998) Real-time monitoring of laser beam welding using infrared weld emissions. J Laser Appl 10(5):205–211

  9. 9.

    Farson DF, Kim KR (1999) Generation of optical and acoustic emissions in laser weld plumes. J Appl Phys 85(3):1329–1336. doi:10.1063/1.369263

  10. 10.

    Matsunawa A, Kim JD, Seto N, Mizutani M, Katayama S (1998) Dynamics of keyhole and molten pool in laser welding. J Laser Appl 10(6):247–254

  11. 11.

    Fujinaga S, Takenaka H, Narikiyo T, Katayama S, Matsunawa A (2000) Direct observation of keyhole behaviour during pulse modulated high-power Nd:YAG laser irradiation. J Phys D Appl Phys 33(5):492–497. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/33/5/304

  12. 12.

    Matsunawa A (2001) Problems and solutions in deep penetration laser welding. Sci Technol Weld Join 6(6):351–354

  13. 13.

    Kawahito Y, Mizutani M, Katayama S (2009) High quality welding of stainless steel with 10 kW high power fibre laser. Sci Technol Weld Join 14(4):288–294. doi:10.1179/136217108x372531

  14. 14.

    Ki H, Mohanty PS, Mazumder J (2002) Modeling of laser keyhole welding: part I. Mathematical modeling, numerical methodology, role of recoil pressure, multiple reflections, and free surface evolution. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 33(6):1817–1830

  15. 15.

    Ye XH, Chen X (2002) Three-dimensional modelling of heat transfer and fluid flow in laser full-penetration welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 35(10):1049–1056. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/35/10/313

  16. 16.

    Rai R, Elmer JW, Palmer TA, Debroy T (2007) Heat transfer and fluid flow during keyhole mode laser welding of tantalum, Ti-6Al-4 V, 304 L stainless steel and vanadium. J Phys D Appl Phys 40(18):5753–5766. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/40/18/037

  17. 17.

    Pang S, Chen L, Zhou J, Yin Y, Chen T (2011) A three-dimensional sharp interface model for self-consistent keyhole and weld pool dynamics in deep penetration laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 44(2):1–15. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/44/2/025301

  18. 18.

    Kazemi K, Goldak JA (2009) Numerical simulation of laser full penetration welding. Comput Mater Sci 44(3):841–849. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.01.002

  19. 19.

    Jin X, Li L, Zhang Y (2002) A study on fresnel absorption and reflections in the keyhole in deep penetration laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 35(18):2304–2310

  20. 20.

    Jin X, Berger P, Graf T (2006) Multiple reflections and Fresnel absorption in an actual 3D keyhole during deep penetration laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 39(21):4703–4712

  21. 21.

    Jin X, Cheng Y, Zeng L, Zou Y, Zhang H (2012) Multiple reflections and fresnel absorption of Gaussian laser beam in an actual 3D keyhole during deep-penetration laser welding. Int J Optics 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/361818

  22. 22.

    Cho JH, Na SJ (2006) Implementation of real-time multiple reflection and Fresnel absorption of laser beam in keyhole. J Phys D Appl Phys 39(24):5372

  23. 23.

    Bedenko DV, Kovalev OB, Krivtsun IV (2010) Simulation of plasma dynamics in a keyhole during laser welding of metal with deep penetration. J Phys D Appl Phys 43(10):1–10. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/43/10/105501

  24. 24.

    Zhou J, Tsai H, Lehnhoff T (2006) Investigation of transport phenomena and defect formation in pulsed laser keyhole welding of zinc-coated steels. J Phys D Appl Phys 39(24):5338

  25. 25.

    Zhou J, Tsai HL (2007) Porosity formation and prevention in pulsed laser welding. J Heat Transf 129(8):1014–1024. doi:10.1115/1.2724846

  26. 26.

    Zhou J, Tsai HL (2007) Effects of electromagnetic force on melt flow and porosity prevention in pulsed laser keyhole welding. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50(11):2217–2235

  27. 27.

    Cho JH, Farson DF, Milewski JO, Hollis KJ (2009) Weld pool flows during initial stages of keyhole formation in laser welding. J Phys D: Appl Phys 42 (17). doi:10.1088/0022-3727/42/17/175502

  28. 28.

    Cho W-I, Na S-J, Thomy C, Vollertsen F (2012) Numerical simulation of molten pool dynamics in high power disk laser welding. J Mater Process Technol 212(1):262–275. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.09.011

  29. 29.

    Cho W-I, Na S-J, Cho M-H, Lee J-S (2010) Numerical study of alloying element distribution in CO2 laser–GMA hybrid welding. Comput Mater Sci 49(4):792–800. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.06.025

  30. 30.

    Zhao H, Niu W, Zhang B, Lei Y, Kodama M, Ishide T (2011) Modelling of keyhole dynamics and porosity formation considering the adaptive keyhole shape and three-phase coupling during deep-penetration laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 44(48):1–15. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/44/48/485302

  31. 31.

    Anderson JD (1995) Computational fluid dynamics, vol 206. McGraw-Hill, New York

  32. 32.

    Hirt CW, Nichols BD (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39(1):201–225

  33. 33.

    Jin X (2008) A three-dimensional model of multiple reflections for high-speed deep penetration laser welding based on an actual keyhole. Opt Lasers Eng 46(1):83–93. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2007.05.009

  34. 34.

    Kaplan A (1994) A model of deep penetration laser welding based on calculation of the keyhole profile. J Phys D Appl Phys 27(9):1805–1816

  35. 35.

    Meng C, Lu F-g, Cui H-c, Tang X-h (2013) Research on formation and stability of keyhole in stationary laser welding on aluminum MMCs reinforced with particles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol: 1–9

  36. 36.

    Liang G, Zhou G, Yuan S (2009) Study on hybrid heat source overlap welding of magnesium alloy AZ31B. Mater Sci Eng A 499(1):93–96

  37. 37.

    Semak V, Matsunawa A (1997) The role of recoil pressure in energy balance during laser materials processing. J Phys D Appl Phys 30(18):2541–2552. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/30/18/008

  38. 38.

    Gao Z, Wu Y, Huang J (2009) Analysis of weld pool dynamic during stationary laser–MIG hybrid welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(9):870–879. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1896-4

  39. 39.

    Semak VV, Bragg WD, Damkroger B, Kempka S (1999) Transient model for the keyhole during laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 32(15):L61–L64. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/32/15/103

  40. 40.

    Voller V, Prakash C (1987) A fixed grid numerical modelling methodology for convection-diffusion mushy region phase-change problems. Int J Heat Mass Transf 30(8):1709–1719

  41. 41.

    Yang J, Wang F (2009) 3D finite element temperature field modelling for direct laser fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(11):1060–1068

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Fenggui Lu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(MPG 1745 kb)

ESM 1

(MPG 1745 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, X., Lu, F., Cui, H. et al. Numerical modeling on the formation process of keyhole-induced porosity for laser welding steel with T-joint. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72, 241–254 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5609-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Laser welding
  • Steel with T-joint
  • Keyhole-induced porosity
  • Mathematical model
  • Mechanism of porosity formation