Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

“Supermarket warehouses”: stocking policies optimization in an assembly-to-order environment

Abstract

In modern assembly-to-order systems, sub-assemblies warehouse locations, dimensions, and supply are critical decisional variables. Persona et al. (Int J Prod Econ 110(1–2):147–159, 2007) affirm the structural diversity between assembly parts can largely influence the stocking policies. On the other hand, Zhang et al. (2007) and Hsu et al. (Nav Res Logist 54(5):510–523, 2007) substantiate that the problem gets more complex when it comes to choosing the correct physical locations for common assembly parts. The study at hand concentrates on components warehouse centralization/decentralization choices in an assembly-to-order (ATO) environment, which typically supplies the assembly systems with components’ kits through decentralized warehouses called “Supermarkets”. Specifically, this paper applies an innovative step-by-step procedure to support materials management decision-making policies in order to define when, how, and where it is convenient to install a supermarket warehouse, considering the typical aspect of an ATO environment: number, type, position of the assembly systems, demand rate and commonality degree of components used, internal transportation equipment and transportation costs, load unit capacity, space cost for stocking, space availability in the plant, inventory costs, and safety stock dimension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Akçay Y, Xu SH (2004) Joint inventory replenishment and component allocation optimization in an assemble-to-order system. Manag Sci 50(1):99–116

  2. 2.

    Azzi A, Battini D, Faccio M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2009) Quantificare l’Indice Annuo dei Costi di Giacenza: Modello di Calcolo e Analisi Comparativa di Casi Studio, Prooceding ANIMP 2007. 36°Convegno Nazionale Ingegneria E Impiantistica Italiana Rome, 11–12 June 2009. http://www.animp.it/news.aspx?sezione=Convegni

  3. 3.

    Battini D, Faccio M, Ferrari E, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2007) Design configuration for a mixed-model assembly system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:188–200

  4. 4.

    Battini D, Faccio M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2008) Balancing–sequencing procedure for a mixed model assembly system in case of finite buffer capacity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(3–4):345–359

  5. 5.

    Bollapragada R, Rao US, Zhang J (2004) Managing inventory and supply performance in assembly systems with random supply capacity and demand. Manag Sci 50(12):1729–1743

  6. 6.

    Choi W, Lee Y (2004) A dynamic part-feeding system for an automotive assembly line. Comput Ind Eng 43(1):123–134

  7. 7.

    Chu H, Wang J, Jin Y, Suo H (2006) Decentralized inventory control in a two-component assembly system. Int J Prod Econ 102:255–264

  8. 8.

    Das C, Tyagi R (1999) Effect of correlated demands on safety stock centralization: patterns of correlation versus degree of centralization. Int J Bus Logist 20(1):205–213

  9. 9.

    De Boeck L, Vandaele N (2008) Coordination and synchronization of material flows in supply chains: an analytical approach, International. J Prod Econ 116(1):199–207

  10. 10.

    De Souza MC, De Carvalho CRV, Brizon WB (2008) Packing items to feed assembly lines. Eur J Oper Res 184(2):480–489

  11. 11.

    Drake PR, Lee DM (2009) Component prioritisation for strategic purchasing and the case study of a South Korean elevator manufacturer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:883–895

  12. 12.

    Eppen GD (1979) Effects on centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Manag Sci 51(1):498–501

  13. 13.

    Evers PT, Frederick BJ (1993) The portfolio effect and multiple consolidation points: a critical assessment of the square root law. J Bus Logist 14(2):109–125

  14. 14.

    Hillier MS (2000) Component commonality in multiple-period, assemble-to-order systems. IIE Transactions 32(8):755–766

  15. 15.

    Hillier MS (2002) The costs and benefits of commonality in assemble-to-order systems with a (Q, r)-policy for component replenishment. Eur J Oper Res 141(1):570–586

  16. 16.

    Hsu VN, Lee CY, So KC (2007) Managing components for assemble-to-order products with lead-time-dependent pricing: the full-shipment model. Nav Res Logist 54(5):510–523

  17. 17.

    Yeh WC (2005) A hybrid heuristic algorithm for the multistage supply chain network problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:675–685

  18. 18.

    Li SG, Kuo X (2008) The inventory management system for automobile spare parts in a central warehouse. Expert Systems Appl 34(1):1144–1153

  19. 19.

    Lim SJ, Jeong SJ, Kim KS, Park MW (2006) A simulation approach for production–distribution planning with consideration given to replenishment policies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:593–603

  20. 20.

    Liu SC, Lin CC (2005) A heuristic method for the combined location routing and inventory problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:372–381

  21. 21.

    Manzini R, Gamberi M, Persona A, Regattieri A (2004) A framework for designing a flexible cellular assembly system. Int J Prod Res 17(42):3505–3528

  22. 22.

    Manzini R, Persona A, Regattieri A (2006) Framework for designing and controlling a multicellular flexible manufacturing system. IJSOM 1(2):1–21

  23. 23.

    Matta A, Dallery Y, Di Mascolo M (2005) Analysis of assembly systems controlled with kanbans. Eur J Oper Res 166(1):310–336

  24. 24.

    Mohebbi E, Choobineh F (2005) The impact of component commonality in an assemble-to-order environment under supply and demand uncertainty. Omega, IJMS 33(1):472–482

  25. 25.

    Nonas LS (2009) Finding and identifying optimal inventory levels for systems with common components. Eur J Oper Res 193(1):98–119

  26. 26.

    Persona A, Battini D, Manzini R, Pareschi A (2007) Optimal safety stock levels of subassemblies and manufacturing components. Int J Prod Econ 110(1–2):147–159

  27. 27.

    Ronen D (1990) Inventory centralization/decentralization—the ‘square root law’ revisited again. J Bus Logist 11:129–138

  28. 28.

    Saygin C (2007) Adaptive inventory management using RFID data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1045–1051

  29. 29.

    Stulman A (1987) Benefits of centralized stocking for the multi-centre newsboy problem with first come, first served allocation. J Oper Res Soc 38(9):827–832

  30. 30.

    Thangam A, Uthayakumar R (2009) A two-level distribution inventory system with stochastic. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:1208–1220

  31. 31.

    Ting PS, Hou KL, Chung KJ (2009) An accurate and reliable solution algorithm for the (Q, r) inventory system with a fixed shortage cost. Math Comput Model 49(1):128–135

  32. 32.

    Zhang X, Ou J, Gilbert SM (2007) Coordination of stocking decisions in an assemble to order environment. Retrieved July, 10, 2007, from Kellogg Website: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Maurizio Faccio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Battini, D., Faccio, M., Persona, A. et al. “Supermarket warehouses”: stocking policies optimization in an assembly-to-order environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50, 775–788 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2555-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Stocking policies
  • Assembly to order
  • Centralization/decentralization
  • Warehouse
  • Supermarket