Advertisement

Geography of productivity: evidence from China’s manufacturing industries

  • Shengjun Zhu
  • Canfei He
  • Xinming Xia
Original Paper
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Empirical evidence has confirmed that the locational agglomeration of firms is associated with productivity benefits. Several competing explanations have been proposed for this association: agglomeration externalities effect, sorting effect and selection effect. This work builds on these studies and seeks to make four contributions by using a firm-level dataset on China’s manufacturing industries over the 1999–2007 period. First, it points out that this stand of literature pays insufficient attention to the possibility of adverse sorting. Second, agglomeration externalities have been decomposed to two constituting parts: inter- and intra-industry, which play different roles in the process of sorting and agglomeration. Third, this paper also points out the need to pay attention to firm heterogeneity, in terms of market orientation and ownership type. Finally, the complex role of government policies has been also examined. Econometric results support our hypotheses.

JEL Classification

C12 O11 O53 R11 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Nos. 41425001, 41701115, 41731278].

References

  1. Aghion P, Cai J, Dewatripont M, Du L, Harrison A, Legros P (2015) Industrial policy and competition. Am Econ J Macroecon 7(4):1–32Google Scholar
  2. Alcácer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Manage Sci 53(5):760–776Google Scholar
  3. Alcácer J, Chung W (2014) Location strategies for agglomeration economies. Strateg Manag J 35(12):1749–1761Google Scholar
  4. Andersson M, Lööf H (2011) Agglomeration and productivity: evidence from firm-level data. Ann Reg Sci 46(3):601–620Google Scholar
  5. Antonelli C, Scellato G (2015) Firms size and directed technological change. Small Bus Econ 44(1):207–218Google Scholar
  6. Arimoto Y, Nakajima K, Okazaki T (2009) Agglomeration or selection? The case of the Japanese silk-reeling industry, 1909–1916. RIETI Discussion Paper No. 10-E-003Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin RE, Okubo T (2006) Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: spatial selection and sorting. J Econ Geogr 6(3):323–346Google Scholar
  8. Behrens K, Duranton G, Robert-Nicoud F (2014) Productive cities: sorting, selection, and agglomeration. J Polit Econ 122(3):507–553Google Scholar
  9. Belderbos R, Carree M (2002) The location of Japanese investments in China: agglomeration effects, keiretsu, and firm heterogeneity. J Jpn Int Econ 16(2):194–211Google Scholar
  10. Belderbos R, Fukao K, Ikeuchi K, Fukao K, Kim YG, Kwon HU (2015) Agglomeration and adverse selection: evidence from multi-plant firms. NISTEP Discussion Paper No. 115Google Scholar
  11. Bernard AB, Bradford Jensen J (1999) Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? J Int Econ 47(1):1–25Google Scholar
  12. Castells-Quintana D, Royuela V (2014) Agglomeration, inequality and economic growth. Ann Reg Sci 52(2):343–366Google Scholar
  13. Ciccone A, Hall RE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 86(1):54–70Google Scholar
  14. Combes P-P, Duranton G, Gobillon L, Puga D, Roux S (2012) The productivity advantages of large cities: distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection. Econometrica 80(6):2543–2594Google Scholar
  15. Duranton G, Puga D (2004) Chapter 48—Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Jacques-François T (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2063–2117Google Scholar
  16. Ellison G, Glaeser EL, Kerr WR (2010) What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. Am Econ Rev 100(3):1195–1213Google Scholar
  17. Fan JPH, Gillan SL, Yu X (2013) Innovation or imitation?: the role of intellectual property rights protections. J Multinatl Financ Manag 23(3):208–234Google Scholar
  18. Florida RL, Kenney M (1988) Venture capital, high technology and regional development. Reg Stud 22(1):33–48Google Scholar
  19. Forslid R, Okubo T (2014) Spatial sorting with heterogeneous firms and heterogeneous sectors. Reg Sci Urban Econ 46:42–56Google Scholar
  20. Gaubert C (2017) Firm sorting and agglomeration. Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Glaeser EL, Kerr WR (2009) Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: how much of the spatial distribution can we explain? J Econ Manag Strateg 18(3):623–663Google Scholar
  22. Greenstone M, Hornbeck R, Moretti E (2010) Identifying agglomeration spillovers: evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. J Polit Econ 118(3):536–598Google Scholar
  23. Hasan S, Faggian A, Klaiber HA, Sheldon I (2018) Agglomeration economies or selection? An analysis of Taiwanese science parks. Int Reg Sci Rev 41(3):335–363Google Scholar
  24. He C, Wei YHD, Xie X (2008) Globalization, institutional change, and industrial location: economic transition and industrial concentration in China. Reg Stud 42(7):923–945Google Scholar
  25. He C, Zhou Y, Zhu S (2017) Firm dynamics, institutional context, and regional inequality of productivity in China. Geogr Rev 107(2):296–316Google Scholar
  26. Henderson JV (1986) Efficiency of resource usage and city size. J Urban Econ 19(1):47–70Google Scholar
  27. Hidalgo CA, Klinger B, Barabási A-L, Hausmann R (2007) The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317(5837):482–487Google Scholar
  28. Hudson R (2007) Regions and regional uneven development forever? Some reflective comments upon theory and practice. Reg Stud 41(9):1149–1160Google Scholar
  29. Isard W (1960) Methods of regional analysis: an introduction to regional science. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Kanbur R, Zhang X (2005) Fifty years of regional inequality in China: a journey through central planning, reform, and openness. Rev Dev Econ 9(1):87–106Google Scholar
  32. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499Google Scholar
  33. Lo Turco A, Maggioni D (2016) On firms’ product space evolution: the role of firm and local product relatedness. J Econ Geogr 16(5):975–1006Google Scholar
  34. Lööf H, Nabavi P (2015) Knowledge spillovers, productivity and patent. Ann Reg Sci 55(1):249–263Google Scholar
  35. Marshall A (1920 [1890]) Principles of economics, 8th edn. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin P, Rogers CA (1995) Industrial location and public infrastructure. J Int Econ 39(3):335–351Google Scholar
  37. Maskell P, Malmberg A (1999) The competitiveness of firms and regions: ‘ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning. Eur Urban Reg Stud 6(1):9–25Google Scholar
  38. Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725Google Scholar
  39. Melitz MJ, Giancarlo IPO (2008) Market size, trade, and productivity. Rev Econ Stud 75(1):295–316Google Scholar
  40. Myles Shaver J, Flyer F (2000) Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strateg Manag J 21(12):1175–1193Google Scholar
  41. Neffke F, Henning M, Boschma R (2011) How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Econ Geogr 87(3):237–265Google Scholar
  42. Olley GS, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297Google Scholar
  43. Ottaviano GIP (2012) Agglomeration, trade and selection. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42(6):987–997Google Scholar
  44. Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy 13(6):343–373Google Scholar
  45. Pessoa A (2014) Agglomeration and regional growth policy: externalities versus comparative advantages. Ann Reg Sci 53(1):1–27Google Scholar
  46. Pike A, Tomaney J (2009) The state and uneven development: the governance of economic development in England in the post-devolution Uk. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 2(1):13–34Google Scholar
  47. Puga D (2010) The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies*. J Reg Sci 50(1):203–219Google Scholar
  48. Rey SJ, Janikas MV (2005) Regional convergence, inequality, and space. J Econ Geogr 5(2):155–176Google Scholar
  49. Rice P, Venables AJ, Patacchini E (2006) Spatial determinants of productivity: analysis for the Regions of Great Britain. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36(6):727–752Google Scholar
  50. Saito H, Gopinath M (2009) Plants’ Self-selection, agglomeration economies and regional productivity in Chile. J Econ Geogr 9(4):539–558Google Scholar
  51. Shorrocks A, Wan G (2005) Spatial decomposition of inequality. J Econ Geogr 5(1):59–81Google Scholar
  52. Sutherland D, Yao S (2011) Income inequality in China over 30 years of reforms. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 4(1):91–105Google Scholar
  53. Venables AJ (2011) Productivity in cities: self-selection and sorting. J Econ Geogr 11(2):241–251Google Scholar
  54. Wan G, Lu M, Chen Z (2007) Globalization and regional income inequality: empirical evidence from within China. Rev Income Wealth 53(1):35–59Google Scholar
  55. Zhu S, Fu X (2013) Drivers of export upgrading. World Dev 51:221–233Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Urban and Environmental SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations