Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 463–477 | Cite as

Choosing cities: a behavioural economic approach

  • Marek Banczyk
  • Joanne Laban
  • Jason Potts
Special Issue Paper
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

How do people and firms choose to relocate to new cities? We argue that this difficult yet consequential choice is often poorly made, or not made at all, resulting in undermobility and consequent losses in individual utility and aggregate social welfare. We propose a behavioural economic theory of why this happens and the predictable directions in which failure occurs in terms of characteristic biases and heuristics in city choice (including status quo bias, loss aversion, endowment effect, availability heuristics, present bias, social norms, anchoring, elimination heuristics, sunk cost effects, and regret aversion). We examine how cities and their regional context might mitigate this problem by improving information as inputs into choice and by redesigning the choice architecture to embed effective choice heuristics into city search and match databases.

JEL Classification

D13 D70 D80 R1 

References

  1. Andersson ÅE, Andersson DE (2017) Time, space and capital. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anttiroiko AV (2016) City as a platform: the rise of participatory innovation platforms in Finnish cities. Sustainability 8(9):922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkes HR, Blumer C (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 35:124–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banczyk M, Potts J (2018) City as platform: toward a new economics of cities. In: SSRNGoogle Scholar
  5. Batty M (2008) The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319(5864):769–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batty M (2013) The new science of cities. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettencourt L, Lobo J, Helbing D, Kühnert C, West G (2007) Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(17):7301–7306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bettencourt L, Lobo J, Strumsky D, West G (2010) Urban scaling and its deviations: revealing the structure of wealth, innovation and crime across cities. PLoS ONE 5:e13541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bollier D (2016) The city as platform. The Aspen Institute. http://csreports.aspeninstitute.org/documents/CityAsPlatform.pdf. Accessed 9 Aug 2017
  10. Borjas G (1993) The intergenerational mobility of immigrants. J Labor Econ 11:113–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braudel F (1992) The perspective of the world: civilization and capitalism 1500–1800, vol 3. University of California Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  12. Brickman P, Coates D, Janoff-Bulman R (1978) Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? J Pers Soc Psychol 36(8):917–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Earl PE (1986) Lifestyle economics. Harvester Wheatsheaf, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  14. Earl PE (1990) Economics and psychology: a survey. Econ J 100:718–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Earl PE (2005) Economics and psychology in the twenty-first century. Camb J Econ 29(6):909–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Earl PE, Potts J (2004) The market for preferences. Camb J Econ 28(4):619–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Easterlin R (2003) Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. Econ J 111(473):465–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feser E (2003) What regions do rather than make: a proposed set of knowledge-based occupation clusters. Urban Stud 40(10):1937–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Florida R (2005) Cities and the creative class. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Florida R (2008) Who’s your city?. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Florida R, Gulden T, Mellander C (2008) The rise of the mega-region. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 1(3):459–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujita M, Thisse J (2013) Economics of agglomeration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geisinger A (2004) A group identity theory of social norms and its implications. Tulsa Law Rev 78:605–664Google Scholar
  24. Gigerenzer G, Goldstein D (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychol Rev 103(4):650–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glaeser E (2000) The new economics of urban and regional growth. Oxf Handb Econ Geogr 1:83–98Google Scholar
  26. Glaeser E (2007) The economic approach to cities. NBER working paper. http://www.nber.org/papers/w13696.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
  27. Glaeser E (2012) The triumph of the city. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Glaeser E, Scheinkman J, Shleifer A (1995) Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. J Monet Econ 36:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goldenfein J, Potts J, Rennie E (2018) Blockchains and the cryptocity. Inf Technol 59(6):285–293Google Scholar
  30. Greenwood M, Hunt G, Rickman D, Treyz G (1991) Migration, regional equilibrium, and the estimation of compensating differentials. Am Econ Rev 81:1382–1390Google Scholar
  31. Hall P (1998) Cities in civilization. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartley J, Potts J, MacDonald T (2012) Creative city index. Cult Sci 5(1):110Google Scholar
  33. Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D (2006) What you export matters. J Econ Growth 12(1):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahneman D, Thaler RH (2006) Utility maximization and experienced utility. J Econ Perspect 20(1):221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1982) The psychology of preference. Sci Am 246:160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kotkin J (2006) The city: a global history. Modern Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Kremer M (1993) The O-ring theory of economic development. Quart J Econ 108(3):551–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lubotsky D (2000) Chutes or ladders? a longitudinal analysis of immigrant earnings. Princeton University industrial relations section working paper no. 445, AugustGoogle Scholar
  42. Lucas R (2004) Life earnings and rural-urban migration. J Polit Econ 112(S1):29–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mortensen D, Pissarides C (1994) Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Rev Econ Stud 61(3):397–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mueser P, Graves P (1995) Examining the role of economic opportunity and amenities in explaining population redistribution. J Urban Econ 37:176–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phelps E (2013) Mass flourishing. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  47. Pirenne H (2014/1925) Medieval cities: their origin and the revival of trade. Princeton University Press, Princeton (Princeton Classics)Google Scholar
  48. Potts J (2003) Toward an evolutionary theory of homo economics: the concept of universal nomadism. In: Laurent J (ed) Evolutionary economics and human nature. Edward Elgar, Worcester, pp 195–216Google Scholar
  49. Rappaport J (2004) Why are population flows so persistent? J Urban Econ 56:554–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ren P (2011) Lifetime mobility in the United States. American Community Survey Briefs, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau, November 2011Google Scholar
  51. Rochet J, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosen S (1986) The theory of equalizing differences. Handb Labor Econ 1:641–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertain 1:7–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sassen S (1991) The global city. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  55. Schelling T (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Scott A (2002) Global city-regions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Simon H (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart J Econ 69:99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2008) Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin paradox. No. w14282. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2008Google Scholar
  59. Sunstein C, Thaler R (2008) Nudge. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Thaler R (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J Econ Behav Organ 1:39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thaler R (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econ Lett 8(3):201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychol Rev 79(4):281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973a) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn Psychol 5:207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973b) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Von Thuenen J (2009/1826) The Isolated state. Palgrave MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Williamson O (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia UniversityNew York CityUSA
  2. 2.CityglobeNew York CityUSA
  3. 3.School of Economics, Finance and MarketingRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations