Regional multi-pole growth is an important spatial form of regional economic organization pattern. We construct a model of regional multi-pole growth evolution to study its mechanism based on the assumption of heterogeneous space and inseparability of the economic subject. The study concludes that the evolution of regional multi-pole growth is affected by factors such as transportation costs, economies of scale, the crowding-out effect, and the factor endowments of superior location and inferior location. Based on the condition that the factor endowment of a location remains the same, with an increased economy of scale effect and a decline in the marginal production cost advantage, location will strengthen the agglomeration layout, which does not help form regional multi-pole growth patterns. With an increase of the crowding-out effect and a decline in the marginal production cost disadvantage, location will strengthen the dispersed layout, which fosters the formation of the regional multi-pole growth pattern. When transportation costs are high, a decline in such costs strengthens the links among locations, fostering the evolution of the regional spatial organization form to shift from dispersion to agglomeration. However, when transportation costs are somewhat reduced, their further reduction leads the regional spatial organization pattern into dispersion. Therefore, under certain conditions and with a decline in transportation costs, regional multi-pole growth weakens first and then strengthens.
R11 D01 O21
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41601111), National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 17AJL011), and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2015A030310523).
Baldwin RE, Okubo T (2006) Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: spatial selection and sorting. J Econ Geogr 6:323–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschma RA, Frenken K (2006) Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. J Econ Geogr 6:273–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschma R, Frenken K (2015) Evolutionary economic geography (No. 1518). Section of Economic Geography. Utrecht University, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
Brezzi M, Veneri P (2015) Assessing polycentric urban systems in the OECD: country, regional and metropolitan perspectives. Eur Plan Stud 23:1128–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christaller W (1966) Central places in southern Germany. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
d’Aspremont C, Ferreira RDS (2016) Oligopolistic vs. monopolistic competition: do inter-sectoral effects matter? Econ Theory 62:299–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Goei B, Burger MJ, Van Oort FG, Kitson M (2010) Functional polycentrism and urban network development in the Greater South East, United Kingdom: evidence from commuting patterns, 1981–2001. Reg Stud 44:1149–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vaus D, McAllister I (1987) Gender differences in religion: a test of the structural location theory. Am Sociol Rev 52:472–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pribadi DO, Putra AS, Rustiadi E (2015) Determining optimal location of new growth centers based on LGP–IRIO model to reduce regional disparity in Indonesia. Ann Reg Sci 54(1):89–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson PA (1954) The transfer problem and transport costs, II: analysis of effects of trade impediments. Econ J 64:264–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor PJ, Evans DM, Hoyler M, Derudder B, Pain K (2009) The UK space economy as practised by advanced producer service firms: identifying two distinctive polycentric city-regional processes in contemporary Britain. Int J Urban Reg Res 33:700–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables AJ (1996) Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries. Int Econ Rev 37:341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables AJ (2011) Productivity in cities: self-selection and sorting. J Econ Geogr 11:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon R (1966) International investment and International trade in the product cycle. Q J Econ 80:190–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber A (1962) Theory of the location of industries. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar